Case law

Dehne v. United States

23 Cl. Ct. 606 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 3, 1991

Mitchell v. United States, 930 F.2d 893, 896 (Fed.Cir.1991). “The fact that this court has jurisdiction to review actions of military correction boards is not disputable.” Armstrong v. … In Banks v.

McKechnie v. United States

648 F.2d 1300 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 25, 1981

The Board rejected the appeal as untimely. John C. McKechnie v. Department of the Navy, MSPB, Atlanta Field Office, Decision No. AT752B90246 (Aug. 3, 1979). … In McCormack v. United States, 204 Ct.

Monroe M. Tapper & Associates v. United States

514 F.2d 1003 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 19, 1975

In ICC v. … The Board’s failure or refusal to consider such evidence was arbitrary and capricious. He mby v. United States, 185 Ct. Cl. 140, 150 (1968).

Snell v. United States

168 Ct. Cl. 219 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 13, 1964

McEaddy v. United States, 152 Ct. Cl. 311, 313 (1961). See also Patten v. United States, 161 Ct. Cl. 131, 135 (1963); Gordon v. United States, 162 Ct. Cl. 740 (1963); Johnston v. … Nichols v. United States, 158 Ct. Cl. 412, 415 (1962); Hendrick v. United States, 150 Ct. Cl. 437, 445 (1960).

Adkins v. United States

228 Ct. Cl. 909 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 29, 1981

Deering v. United States, 223 Ct. Cl. 342, 351, n.3 , 620 F.2d 242 , 246 n.3 (en banc 1980); Plant v. United States, 222 Ct.Cl. 582 (1980); Frommhagen v. United States, 216 Ct. … Gentry, v. United States, 225 Ct.Cl. 654 (1980). Moreover, even at the correction board level there was prejudice to defendant.

The Jack Stone Company, Inc. v. The United States

344 F.2d 370 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 16, 1965

Kaiser Industries Corp. v. United States, Ct.Cl., 340 F.2d 322 , p. *375 329, decided Jan. 22, 1965; Pfotzer v. … Farwell Co. v. United States, 148 F.Supp. 947 , 137 Ct.Cl. 832 (1957); Henry Spen & Co. v. United States, 153 F.Supp. 407 , 139 Ct. Ct. 613 (1957); Octagon Process, Inc. v. United States, 141 Ct.Cl. 599, 604 (1958).

Gilmore v. United States

228 Ct. Cl. 829 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 31, 1981

Mulholland v. United States, 165 Ct. Cl. 231, 233 (1964); Braude v. United States, 218 Ct. Cl. 270, 273-74 , 585 F.2d 1049, 1051-52 (1978); Fitzgerald v. Seamans, 553 F.2d 220, 228 (D.C. Cir. 1977). … See, Fitzgerald v. Seamans, supra, 553 F.2d 220, 228 .

Garod Radio Corporation v. The United States

307 F.2d 945 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 3, 1962

Reinking Lumber Co. v. United States, Ct.Cl., 283 F.2d 527 , and Armstrong et al. v. United States, Ct.Cl., 287 F.2d 577 . … Bateson Company, Inc. v.

Duhon v. United States

461 F.2d 1278 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 16, 1972

board. 141 Ct. … The correction boards were created to remedy wrongs, not to confound them. Id. at 527 , 172 F. Supp. at 448 . In Betts v. United States, 145 Ct. Cl. 530 , 172 F.

Gerald W. Monett v. The United States

419 F.2d 434 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 12, 1969

But plaintiff maintains that his agreement must be construed in the light of three prior Board of Review decisions (United States v. Renner, CM 393739, January 10, 1957 (unpublished); United States v. … It is on this point that the three Board cases are distinguishable. United States v.

Furlong v. United States

153 Ct. Cl. 557 · United States Court of Claims · May 3, 1961

Cl. 275 ; Girault v. United States, 133 Ct. Cl. 135 ,; Prichard v. United States, 133 Ct. Cl. 212 ; Beamish v. United States, 130 Ct. Cl. 767 ; Holliday v. United States, 128 Ct. Cl. 647 ; Spencer v. … Holliday v. United States, supra; Wales v. United States, 132 Ct. Cl. 765 ; Johnson v. United States, supra.

Bromley Contracting Co. v. United States

34 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,415 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 8, 1987

In S.O.G. v. … Stipulations on questions of law most certainly do not bind a Board of Contract Appeals or any other judicial panel. Swift & Co. v.

McCollum v. United States

32 Cont. Cas. Fed. 73,013 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 4, 1984

A board’s findings of fact, however, are binding on the court unless shown to be arbitrary, capricious or not supported by substantial evidence. See Flexible Metal Hose Co. v. … Hedin Construction Co., Inc. v.

McKee v. United States

500 F.2d 525 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 19, 1974

Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389 (1971); Peters v. United States, 187 Ct. Cl. 63 , 408 F. 2d 719 (1969). … 'Since this is a proceeding for review of an agency appeals board decision, and such review can be made only on the basis of the board record, United States v.

Smith v. United States

67 Ct. Cl. 182 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 11, 1929

In the case of Curtis v. … United States v. Taylor, 104 U. S. 216 ; United States v. Cooper, 120 U. S. 124 ; Rock Island Railroad Co. v. United States, 254 U. S. 141, 143 .

Bromion, Incorporated v. The United States

411 F.2d 1020 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 20, 1969

In Dynamics Corporation of America v. … In Hol-Gar Manufacturing Corp. v. United States, 351 F.2d 972 , 169 Ct. Cl. 384 (1965) the court again concluded it was not bound by a Board determination.

P.J. Maffei Building Wrecking Corp. v. United States

31 Cont. Cas. Fed. 71,307 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 15, 1983

Typical of the cases relied upon are Foster Construction C.A. v. United States, supra, 193 Ct.Cl. 587 , 435 F.2d 873 (1970) and Fehlhaber Corp. v. … V 1981).

National Movers Co. Inc. v. The United States

386 F.2d 999 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 9, 1967

Thus, the factual findings of the Board are final and conclusive, unless shown to be arbitrary, capricious and unsupported by the evidence. Wunderlich Act, 41 U.S.C. § 321 ; United States v. … (Board Decision p. 7, para. 2.) This fact is significant in light of plaintiff’s burden in a breach of contract case to demonstrate its willingness and ability to perform. See, United States v. Penn Foundry & Mfg.

Henry E. Wile Company v. United States

169 F. Supp. 249 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 14, 1959

United States v. Joseph A. Holpuch Co., 328 U.S. 234 , 66 S.Ct. 1000 , 90 L.Ed. 1192 ; United States v. Blair, 321 U.S. 730 , 64 S.Ct. 820 , 88 L.Ed. 1039 ; United States v. … Callahan Walker Construction Co., 317 U.S. 56 , 63 S.Ct. 113 , 87 L.Ed. 49 ; Pyle v. United States, Ct.Cl., 163 F.Supp. 853 .

Delta Equipment & Construction Co. v. United States

104 F. Supp. 549 · United States Court of Claims · May 6, 1952

In reaching this conclusion we rely in part upon Weissbaum v. United States, 72 C. … Board of Commissioners, etc. v. Franklin, No. 39,793 (La.), appeal dismissed, 342 U. S. 844 (per curiam), rehearing den., 342 U. S. 889 .