Case law

Lemly v. United States

75 F. Supp. 248 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 5, 1948

Cook v. United States, 101 Ct.Cl. 782 ; Blackett v. United States, 81 Ct.Cl. 884 ; Rudd v. United States, 71 Ct.Cl. 432 ; Hoff *250 man v. United States, 66 Ct.Cl. 452 ; Gay v. … The case of Denby v.

James A. Beckham v. The United States

392 F.2d 619 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 19, 1968

Needless to say, this is not the law; the Navy Board, like other administrative bodies, is bound by its own regulations. See, Hamlin v. … In Grubin v.

Dzialo v. United States

677 F.2d 873 · United States Court of Claims · May 5, 1982

McAulay v. United States, 158 Ct. Cl. 359, 361 , 305 F.2d 836, 839 (1962), cert. denied, 373 U.S. 938 (1963); see Warner v. United States, 225 Ct. Cl. 717 (1980). … Friedman v. United States, 159 Ct. Cl. 1, 19, 24, 35 , 310 F.2d 381, 392, 396, 402 (1962), cert. denied sub nom. Lipp v. United States, 373 U.S. 932 (1963).

Sylvania Electric Products, Inc. v. United States

458 F.2d 994 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 14, 1972

This course would in my opinion encroach upon the Board’s functions as trier of the facts and judge of the credibility of witnesses (Williamsburg Drapery Co. v. United States, 177 Ct. … Fox Valley Engineering, Inc. v. United States, 151 Ct. Cl. 228, 238-40 (1960); Centre Mfg. Co. v. United States, 183 Ct. Cl. 115, 126-28 , 392 F. 2d 229, 230-37 (1968).

Tri-Wall Containers, Inc. v. United States

408 F.2d 748 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 14, 1969

Jungersen v. Baden, 69 F. Supp. *331 922, 928 , 72 USPQ 426, 431 (D.C. S.D. … Connecticut Valley Enterprises, Inc. v. United States, 172 Ct. Cl. 468 , 474, 348 F. 2d 949 , 953, 146 USPQ 404, 407 (1965); Dix-Seal Corp. v. Nero Haven Trap Rock Co., 236 F.

Timber Access Industries Co. v. United States

553 F.2d 1250 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 20, 1977

Anthony Grace & Sons, Inc. v. United States, supra 170 Ct.Cl. at 695 , 345 F.2d at 811-12 ; Wingate Construction Co. v. United States, 164 Ct.Cl. 131 (1964); Beacon Construction Co. v. … The Board, finding the appeal untimely, had *661 denied it. We agree with the Board’s result, although reaching the same conclusion, as a matter of law, by a different route. See Federal Electric Corp. v.

Olsberg Excavating Co. v. United States

31 Cont. Cas. Fed. 71,445 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 8, 1983

National Electric Coil v. United States, 227 Ct.Cl. 595, 597 (1981); Prime Construction Co. v. United States, 231 Ct.Cl. — (order, July 2, 1982); see also Skelly and Loy v. … Cosmic Construction Co. v. United States, supra. 8 An untimely “appeal” to an agency board of contract appeals is an absolute nullity, if indeed not a contradiction in terms.

Angrisani v. United States

172 Ct. Cl. 439 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 16, 1965

Deviny v. Campbell, 194 F. 2d 876, 878 (D.C. Cir.), cert. denied 344 U.S. 826 (1952). In Atkinson v. … This court, in Chisholm v.

Kirchhof v. United States

102 F. Supp. 770 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 5, 1952

Plaintiffs also placed some reliance on the case of Paretta Contracting Co. v. United States, 109 Ct.Cl. 324 . … Irwin & Leighton v. United States, 115 Ct.Cl. 18 .

Cooper v. United States

178 Ct. Cl. 277 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 20, 1967

In Furlong v. United States, 153 Ct. … Snell v. United States, 168 Ct.

Red Circle Corporation v. The United States

398 F.2d 836 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 17, 1968

Natus Corp. v. United States, 178 Ct.Cl. 1, 12 , 371 F.2d 450, 457 (1967). … Co. v. United States, Ct.Cl., 394 F.2d 834 , decided May 10, 1968; Clack v. United States, Ct.Cl., 395 F.2d 773 , decided May 10, 1968; Jefferson Constr. Co. v. United *842 States, Ct.

Tri-Wall Containers, Inc. v. The United States and St. Regis Paper Company, Intervenor-Defendant

408 F.2d 748 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 14, 1969

Connecticut Valley Enterprises, Inc. v. United States, 348 F.2d 949, 953 , 172 Ct.Cl. 468, 474 (1965) ; Dix-Seal Corp. v. New Haven Trap Rock Co., 236 F.Supp. 914, 917-920 (D.C.Conn.1964). … See Martin-Marietta Corporation v. United States, 373 F.2d 972 , 179 Ct.Cl. 70 (1967). Plaintiff’s petition should be dismissed.

Maxwell Dynamometer Co. v. United States

386 F.2d 855 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 9, 1967

Co. v. United States, 176 Ct. … Where an administrative board has failed to make a relevant finding of fact as to which the evidence is undisputed, this court has made such finding rather than referring the matter to the board. Kraus v.

Jenkins v. United States

228 Ct. Cl. 794 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 24, 1981

Ill 1979), of an adverse decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board ("Board”) upholding his discharge by the United States General Services Administration. … Coleman v. Department of the Navy, 227 Ct. Cl. 536 (1981).

Electric Boat Co. v. United States

66 Ct. Cl. 333 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 3, 1928

See also Savage Arms Corporation v. United States, 266 U. S. 217 ; Russell Motor Car Co. v. United States, 261 U. S. 514 ; United States v. Swift & Co., 270 U. S. 124 ; American Smelting & Refining Co. v. … Daughetee v. Ohio Oil Co., 263 Ill. 518 ; Anvil Mining Co. v. Humble, 153 U. S. 540 . The precept creating the Baxter Board contained specific directions as to subject matter of investigation and items of increase.

Chris Berg, Inc. v. United States

455 F.2d 1037 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 18, 1972

Corp. v. United States, supra. … Corp. v. United States, 192 Ct.

Duvall v. United States

647 F.2d 131 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 22, 1981

See Consolidated Edison Co. v. NLRB, 305 U.S. 197, 229-230 (1938). However, hearsay evidence can constitute substantial evidence, see Richardson v. … Slightly later yet comes Jacobowitz v.

Biddle v. United States

186 Ct. Cl. 87 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 13, 1968

See, e.g., Stephens v. United States, 174 Ct. Cl. 365, 370 , 358 F. 2d 951, 953 (1966) ; Oleson v. United States, 172 Ct. Cl. 9, 13 (1965) ; finding No. 12 infra. Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs Reservation v. … Dayley v. United States, 169 Ct. Cl. 306 , 308 (1965).

Norman v. United States

392 F.2d 255 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 15, 1968

See, e.g., Arizona v. California, 373 U.S. 546, 584-585 ; FCC v. RCA Communications, Inc. 346 U.S. 86 ; Lichter v. United States, 334 U.S. 742 ; Yakus v. United States, supra, 321 U.S. at 424; Bandini Petroleum Co. v. … Bell v. United States, 366 U.S. 393, 401 (1961) ; Cf. Leonard v. United States, 279 U.S. 40 (1929) ; United States v. McDonald, 128 U.S. 471 (1888) ; Byrd v. United States, 103 Ct. Cl. 285 (1945) ; Amchanitzky v.

Grumman Aerospace Corp. v. United States

579 F.2d 586 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 14, 1978

Renegotiation Board v. Grumman Aircraft Eng’r Corp., 421 U.S. 168 (1975). … Relying heavily upon certain language in Renegotiation Board v.