Case law

Foster v. United States

3 Cl. Ct. 440 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 21, 1983

Deering v. United States, 223 Ct.Cl. 342, 349 , 620 F.2d 242, 245 (1980) (en banc) (citing Brundage v. … Harrison v.

BCM Corp. v. United States

31 Cont. Cas. Fed. 71,110 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 26, 1983

The Board’s opinion does not set forth the law or otherwise state the contracting officer’s duty to verify a bid. In addition to Framlau, the cases that the Board cited on the issue, Gresham & Co. v. … Aydin Corp. v.

Beamish v. United States

128 F. Supp. 158 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 8, 1955

after careful consideration of the proceedings of the board and plaintiff’s rebuttal statement, the findings of the board were approved by direction of the Secretary of the Army. … The facts in this case closely parallel those in the case of Holliday v. United States, 128 C.

Nelms v. United States

167 Ct. Cl. 423 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 17, 1964

She had a large brown envelope of papers and offered them to me to review, indicating she had performance ratings, letters from people she had worked for etc. … It stated, in part, that I had a large brown envelope of papers with me when I was employed, but that she was interested only in confirming eligibility for reinstatement.

Jo-Bar Manufacturing Corp. v. United States

535 F.2d 62 · United States Court of Claims · May 12, 1976

Eggers & Higgins v. United States, 185 Ct. Cl. 765, 785-86 , 403 F. 2d 225, 236 (1968) ; Turnbull, Inc. v. United States, supra. Plaintiff was an experienced government contractor. … Pelliccia v. United States, 208 Ct. Cl. 278 , 294—95, 525 F. 2d 1035, 1045 (1975); Hoel-Steffen Constr. Co. v. United States, 197 Ct. Cl. 561, 568-69 , 456 F. 2d 760, 765 (1972).

Seger v. United States

469 F.2d 292 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 10, 1972

Co. v. United States, 165 Ct. Cl. 382, 391 (1964). Aragona Constr. Co. v. United States, supra note 39; J. D. Hedin Constr. Co. v. United States, 171 Ct. Cl. 70, 105-06 , 347 F. 2d 235, 257-58 (1965). … Boyajian v. United States, 191 Ct. Cl. 233, 239 , 423 F. 2d 1231, 1235 (1970). See also River Constr. Corp. v. United States, 159 Ct. Cl. 254, 270 (1962) ; J. D. Hedin Constr. Co. v. United States, 171 Ct.

National Concrete & Foundation Co. v. United States

170 Ct. Cl. 470 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 16, 1965

Construction Co., Inc. v. United States, 157 Ct. … See River Construction Corporation v. United States, supra; also see T. C. Bateson Construction Co. v. United States, 149 Ct.

Cruz-Casado v. United States

553 F.2d 672 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 20, 1977

Service v. Dulles, 354 U.S. 363 (1957); Bray v. United States, 207 Ct. Cl. 60 , 515 F. 2d 1383 (1975). … Pascal v. United States, 211 Ct. Cl. 183 , 543 F. 2d 1284 (1976); Rasmussen v. United States, 211 Ct. Cl. 260 , 543 F. 2d 134 (1976); Henderson v. United States, 175 Ct.

Whittaker Corporation v. The United States

443 F.2d 1373 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 11, 1971

In the Board’s view, these made no difference. 27 . Cf. Ray D. Bolander Co. v. United States, 186 Ct.Cl. 398, 405, 415 (1968). 28 . … Since much of the Board record (including all oral testimony) antedates United States v.

American Construction Co. v. United States

107 F. Supp. 858 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 7, 1952

Until the Board had taken final action plaintiff as a matter of law could not have filed suit in this court. Richardson v. United States, 114 C. Cls. 695, 701 . … Stallman v. United States, supra. “It was certainly never intended that claimants should, either in person or by representatives, attend upon the [Board] and await [its] disposition of their claims.” United States v.

Bowman v. United States

142 Ct. Cl. 367 · United States Court of Claims · May 7, 1958

Cls. 135 ; Furlong v. United States, 138 C. Cls. 843 ; Wales v. United States, 132 C. Cls. 765 ; Prichard v. United States, 133 C. Cls. 212 . … Absent an allegation and proof of arbitrary action, plaintiff is bound by the approved decision of that board. Wales v. United States, supra; Gordon v. United States, 129 C. Cls. 270 ; Woodford v. United States, 138 C.

Tombigbee Constructors v. The United States

420 F.2d 1037 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 23, 1970

The holding is within the doctrine of Natus Corp. v. United States, 371 F.2d 450 , 178 Ct.Cl. 1 (1967) and Clark Grave Vault Co. v. United States, 371 F.2d 459 , 178 Ct.Cl. 52 (1967). … Koppers Co. v. United States, 405 F.2d 554, 558-559 , 186 Ct.Cl. 142, 150-151 (1968). To the extent that the conclusion of the Board was a matter of law (see Natus Corp. v. United States, supra; Clark Grave Vault Co. v.

Urban Plumbing & Heating Co., an Oregon Corporation v. The United States

408 F.2d 382 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 14, 1969

The Board found that no duress existed, citing Du Puy v. … The Board cites Commonwealth Engineering Co. of Ohio v.

Rawlins v. United States

686 F.2d 903 · United States Court of Claims · Aug 11, 1982

(Rawlins v. United States, 197 Ct. Cl. 972, 1016 (1972)). … See Engels v. United States, 230 Ct. Cl. 465 , 678 F. 2d 173 (1982); Riley v. United States, 221 Ct. Cl. 308 , 608 F.2d 441 (1979); Sanders v. United States, 219 Ct. Cl. 285 , 594 F.2d 804 (1979).

Hughes Aircraft Co.

215 Ct. Cl. 989 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 16, 1977

Defendant moved under it on July 15, 1977, for an order disqualifying Judge Browne. … "In Kesselhaut v. United States, 214 Ct.

Lincoln Services, Ltd. v. United States

678 F.2d 157 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 21, 1982

Burroughs Corp. v. United States, 223 Ct. Cl. 53, 63 , 617 F.2d 590, 598 (1980). Sperry Flight Systems v. United States, 212 Ct. Cl. 329, 339 , 548 F.2d 915, 921 (1977). United States ex rel. Accardi v. … Brooks v. Clifford, 409 F.2d 700, 706 , rehearing denied, 412 F.2d 1137 (4th Cir. 1969). United States v.

Liles Construction Co. v. United States

455 F.2d 527 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 18, 1972

Co. v. United States, 176 Ct. … Co. v. United States, 187 Ct.

J. A. Terteling & Sons, Inc. v. The United States

390 F.2d 926 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 16, 1968

In a recent case, United Contractors v. … See: National Concrete & Foundation Co. v.

Benevento v. United States

461 F.2d 1316 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 16, 1972

Daniels v. United States, supra; Ayres v. United States, supra; Abbott v. United States, 138 Ct. Cl. 459, 463 , 151 F. Supp. 929, 932 (1957). … V, 1965-69).

Cooper v. United States

203 Ct. Cl. 300 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 19, 1973

There is a strong presumption that the board and the Secretary faithfully discharged their duties and the burden is upon plaintiff to prove otherwise. Callan v. United States, 196 Ct. … Cl. 392 , 450 F. 2d 1121 *305 (1971); Biddle v. United States, 186 Ct. Cl. 87 (1968). Plaintiff sought to meet that burden by complaints of irregularities in the actions of the board.