Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
6,266 results
4.14s
Gustine Land & Cattle Co. v. United States
174 Ct. Cl. 556 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 18, 1966
Attorneys for the United States Reclamation Bureau instructed the board as to the extent of such water rights. … In Slattery Company v.
Cited 15 timesPublished425 F.2d 738 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 17, 1970
Consequently, the court is correct in holding that United States v. … Brown * ... Litigation.Rene Bellinger law suit; Fairhaven damage claim. 15-6/6 _Property transfers resulting from divorce.. Arnold J. Zurcher, Jr.* Trainoe. 65-3/6 Courtland W. Troutman.* Traineo.
Cited 12 timesPublishedDominion Magnesium Ltd. v. United States
320 F.2d 388 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 12, 1963
Pidgeon became a member of the board of directors of plaintiff. Dr. … The settlement agreement also provides as follows: ARTICLE v Notwithstanding anything herein contained, this agreement shall not be construed as a license for continuing operation under any Letters Patent covering inventions
Cited 34 timesPublishedDavid Nassif Associates v. United States
557 F.2d 249 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 15, 1977
However, Nassif was eventually forced to remove the drugstore as a result of a court order in another case, L’Enfant Plaza North, Inc. v. … Under date of December 8, 1972, the GSA Board of Contract Appeals granted plaintiffs Motion to Dismiss. ULTIMATE FINDING 60. Plaintiff contractually obligated itself to provide a cafeteria in the Nassif Building.
Cited 56 timesPublished166 F. Supp. 602 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 8, 1958
See Fremon v. W. A. Sheaffer Pen Co., 209 F. 2d 627 (8th Cir.); National Bank v. Louisville Trust Co., 67 F. 2d 97, 102 (6th Cir.); Bonk v. Vozajian, 128 Cal. … See State v. McCombs, 156 Kan. 391 , 133 P. 2d 134 ; Whiteside v. Oasis Club, 162 Mo. App. 502 , 142 S. W. 752 ; State v. Hall, 25 N. D. 85 , 141 N. W. 124 . [Italics supplied.]
Cited 5 timesPublishedCentral National Life Insurance Co. of Omaha v. United States
574 F.2d 1067 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 19, 1978
Co. v. United States, supra note 3, 178 Ct. Cl. at 842 , 373 F.2d at 353 ; Penn Sec. Life Ins. Co. v. United States, supra note 18, 207 Ct. Cl. at 598 , 524 F.2d at 1156 ; Mutual Benefit Life Ins. Co. v. … Co. v. United States, 200 Ct.
Cited 7 timesPublished164 Ct. Cl. 612 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 14, 1964
See United States v. Causby, 328 U.S. 256, 263-64 (1946); Aaron v. United States, 160 Ct. Cl. 295, 300 , 311 F. 2d 798, 801 (1963). See, generally, cases cited in Jensen v. United States, 158 Ct. … The soil is a reddish brown, suitable for raising cotton and small grains. Cotton allotment is 36.6 acres.
Cited 28 timesPublishedMoore-McCormack Lines, Inc. v. United States
301 F.2d 342 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 4, 1962
Grace Line, Inc., v. United States, 155 Ct. … In Grace Line, Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedPennsylvania Electric Co. v. United States
133 Ct. Cl. 314 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 8, 1955
The situation was unlike that in Commissioner v. Jacobson, 336 U. S. 28 , and Marshall Drug Co. v. United *318 States, 118 C. … S. 1 , and Commissioner v. Jacobson, 336 U. S. 28 .
Cited 0 timesPublishedCommerce International Co. v. United States
167 Ct. Cl. 529 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 16, 1964
E.g., United States v. Howard P. Foley Co., 329 U.S. 64 (1946); United States v. Rice, 317 U.S. 61 (1942); Gilbane Building Co. v. United States, 166 Ct. Cl. 347 , 333 F. 2d 867 (1964); Barling v. United States, 126 Ct. … Lee & Co. v. United States, supra; Ralph Feffer & Sons v. United States, 166 Ct. Cl. 506, 514 (1964).
Cited 25 timesPublished144 Ct. Cl. 761 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 14, 1959
Barlcer, et al. v. United States, 117 C. … On March 25, 1954, a test claim on behalf of plaintiff Edward V.
Cited 0 timesPublishedServidone Construction Corp. v. United States
36 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,797 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 2, 1990
See Johns-Manville Corp. v. … While Bell v.
Cited 28 timesPublishedDulien Steel Products, Inc. v. United States
143 Ct. Cl. 484 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 16, 1958
There was no escape clause in the instant contract, as in Silverton v. United States, 118 C. Cls. 232 (1951), Schneiderman v. United States, 117 C. Cls. 715 (1950), or North and Judd Manufacturing Company v. … The Surplus Property Board estimated that some 4,000,000 different Items are on sale — enough to fill 50 mail order catalogs.
Cited 2 timesPublishedCalifornia Canners & Growers Ass'n v. United States
7 Cl. Ct. 69 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 14, 1984
In Wong v. … See, e.g., Brandt v. Hickel, 427 F.2d 53 (9th Cir.1970); Pickus v. United States Board of Parole, 507 F.2d 1107 (D.C.Cir.1974). . 21 U.S.C. § 371 (e) provides procedures for limited circumstances not relevant here. .
Cited 10 timesPublished29 Ct. Cl. 68 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 1, 1894
mentioned, but also with certificates containing the several particulars of the cargo, and— “the place whence the ship sailed, and whither she is bound, so that it may be known whether any forbidden or contraband goods be on board … certificate shall be made out by the officers of the place whence the ship set sail in the accustomed form; and if anyone shall think it fit or advisable to express in the said certificate the person to whom the goods on board
Cited 2 timesPublished461 F.2d 810 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 16, 1972
V, 1965-69), and state as follows: §5542. Overtime rates; computation. … V, 1965-69), and state as follows: § 1353a. Officers and employees; overtime services; extra compensation; length of working day.
Cited 7 timesPublishedTechnical Development Corp. v. United States
202 Ct. Cl. 237 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 20, 1973
The cases cited by the plaintiffs, Armstrong Cork Co. v. Lyons, 366 F. 2d 206 (8th Cir. 1966), and Freitag v. … V. G.
Cited 8 timesPublished153 Ct. Cl. 301 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 7, 1961
Fully accredited by the New York State Board of Regents, the school is offering an accelerated program of Regents and non-Regents subjects. … Service v. Dulles, 354 U.S. 363, 388 (1957); Vitarelli v. Seaton, 359 U.S. 535, 539 (1959); Watson v. United States, 142 Ct. Cl. 749, 756 (1958).
Cited 0 timesPublished393 F.2d 939 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 19, 1968
Heiner v. … McLain v.
Reversed on other grounds by United States v. Estate of Grace, 395 U.S. 316 (1969)Cited 8 timesPublished163 Ct. Cl. 167 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 15, 1963
. *212 Sec. 25.264 Bates of additional compensation payable v/nder section %5.%61. ***** (b) If any such department or other agency wishes to pay additional compensation under section 25.261 to an employee in a position meeting … (See applicable Treasury Decisions on Wage Board.) $ $ $ $ $ 1939.5 Overtime Duty $ ^ (4) General Policy Regarding Overtime WorJc.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna