Case law

Turnbull, Inc., Individually and Turnbull, Inc., and A. & H., Inc., Co-Venturers v. The United States

389 F.2d 1007 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 20, 1967

McGraw & Co. v. … Under United States v.

Marley v. United States

423 F.2d 324 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 20, 1970

General Builders Supply Co. v. United States, supra. The merits of the challenge to the Board’s decision are now to be considered. … Rumley v. United States, supra; Alabama Shirt & Trouser Co. v. United States, supra.

Foster v. United States

3 Cl. Ct. 440 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 21, 1983

Deering v. United States, 223 Ct.Cl. 342, 349 , 620 F.2d 242, 245 (1980) (en banc) (citing Brundage v. … Harrison v.

Murray v. United States

154 Ct. Cl. 185 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 7, 1961

(Citing Harmon v. Brucker, supra.) … Service v. Dulles, 354 U.S. 363 (1957); Watson v. United States, 142 Ct. Cl. 749 (1958).

Astro-Space Laboratories, Inc. v. United States

470 F.2d 1003 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 12, 1972

Findings of fact of a Board are, of course, final and binding in litigation properly before this court even as to the issue of breach of contract, over which the Board has no jurisdiction. United States v. … Plaintiff now objects to the reliance of the Board on these sources, citing Duhame v. United States, 127 Ct. Cl. 679, 683 , 119 F.

Seger v. United States

469 F.2d 292 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 10, 1972

Co. v. United States, 165 Ct. Cl. 382, 391 (1964). Aragona Constr. Co. v. United States, supra note 39; J. D. Hedin Constr. Co. v. United States, 171 Ct. Cl. 70, 105-06 , 347 F. 2d 235, 257-58 (1965). … Boyajian v. United States, 191 Ct. Cl. 233, 239 , 423 F. 2d 1231, 1235 (1970). See also River Constr. Corp. v. United States, 159 Ct. Cl. 254, 270 (1962) ; J. D. Hedin Constr. Co. v. United States, 171 Ct.

Blackmar v. United States

120 F. Supp. 408 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 6, 1954

Eberlein v. United States, 257 U.S. 82 , 42 S.Ct. 12 , 66 L.Ed. 140 ; Love v. United States, 98 F.Supp. 770 , 119 Ct.Cl. 486 ; Wittner v. United States, 76 F.Supp. 110 , 110 Ct.Cl. 231 ; Gadsden v. … Stringer v. United States, 90 F.Supp. 375 , 117 Ct.Cl. 30 ; Wittner v. United States, supra.

E.D.S. Federal Corp. v. United States

30 Cont. Cas. Fed. 70,659 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 3, 1983

See Dravo-Groves v. United States, Ct.Cl. No. 371-81C (order of July 16, 1982) and cases cited therein. … See Roubin & Janeiro, Inc. v. United States, 652 F.2d 70 , Ct.Cl. No. 396-80C, pp. 7-8 (order of Mar. 13, 1981).

Barker v. United States

140 F. Supp. 415 · United States Court of Claims · May 1, 1956

His right of action accrued only when the retiring board acts arbitrarily or otherwise unlawfully. Odell v. United States, 134 C. Cls. 634 . It was on this date (May 14, 1947) that plaintiff’s cause of action accrued. … Cuiffo v. United States, 131 C. Cls. 60 ; Girault v. United States, 133 C. Cls. 135 ; MacFarlane v. United States, 134 C. Cls. 755 . Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is denied.

Roscoe-Ajax Construction Co. v. United States

458 F.2d 55 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 14, 1972

However, this determination must in the first instance be made by the Board. United States v. Anthony Grace & Sons, Inc., 384 U.S. 424, 428-29 (1966). … Bostwick-Batterson Co. v. United States, 161 Ct.

Farnsworth & Chambers Co., Inc. v. The United States

346 F.2d 577 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 11, 1965

Co. v. … Shepherd v. United States, supra, 113 F.Supp. at 650, 125 Ct.Cl. at 729 . 9 . This argument is not mentioned by the Board.

Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Company v. The United States

374 F.2d 516 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 17, 1967

The Board is not delegated uncontrolled discretion and its failure to apply guidelines prescribed by authority in a regulation would be an error of law. Paul v. … See e. g., Warner & Swasey Co. v. War Contracts Price Adjustment Board, 91 U.S.App.D.C. 330 , 201 F.2d 201 (1952), cert. denied 345 U.S. 924 , 73 S.Ct. 782 , 97 L.Ed. 1355 ; Eastern Machinery Co. v.

Prince v. United States

119 F. Supp. 421 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 2, 1954

The Tax Court of the United States in Scarce v. Commissioner, 17 T.C. 830 , and in Elmer D. Pangburn, 13 T.C. 169 , seems to have taken a similar view. … See also Allen v. Spencer, D.C.Cir., 192 F.2d 477 .

Dye v. United States

166 Ct. Cl. 540 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 12, 1964

See, e.g., Robinson v. United States, 163 Ct. Cl. 235 (1963); Merriott v. United States, 163 Ct. Cl. 261 (1963); Teitelbaum v. … But, as the Court of Claims stated in Friedman v.

Lykes Bros. Steamship Co. v. United States

459 F.2d 1393 · United States Court of Claims · May 12, 1972

In Boeing Co. v. Renegotiation Board, 325 F. 2d 885 (9th Cir.1963), and Consolidated-Hammer Dry Plate and Film Co. v. … Co. v.

Barnum

529 F.2d 531 · United States Court of Claims · Aug 1, 1975

Doggett v. United States, ante at 478; Cooper v. United States, 203 Ct. Cl. 300 (1973); Abruzzo v. United States, 206 Ct. Cl. 731 , 513 F. 2d 608 (1975). … See Austin v. United States, 206 Ct. Cl. 719 , cert. denied, 423 U.S. 911 (1975); and Jankovic v. United States, 204 Ct. Cl. 807 (1974).

Gregory Lumber Co. v. United States

29 Cont. Cas. Fed. 82,132 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 8, 1982

See Tuttle/White Constructors, Inc. v. United States, 228 Ct. Cl. 364 , 359, 656 F.2d 644, 646-47 (1981). … Tuttle/White Constructors, Inc. v. United States, 228 Ct. Cl. 354 , 656 F.2d 644 (July 29, 1981), was quite different.

Robert A. Muldonian v. The United States

432 F.2d 443 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 16, 1970

Wales v. United States, 130 F.Supp. 900 , 132 Ct.Cl. 765 (1955), aff’d on rehearing, 145 Ct.Cl. 113 (1959); Sanford v. United States, 399 F.2d 693 (9th Cir. 1968); Stephens v. … Again, in Orloff v.

Liles Construction Co. v. United States

455 F.2d 527 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 18, 1972

Co. v. United States, 176 Ct. … Co. v. United States, 187 Ct.

Carlin v. United States

100 F. Supp. 451 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 2, 1951

This board recommended that plaintiff appear before a retiring board. … Lemly v. United States, 75 F.Supp. 248 , 109 Ct.Cl. 760, 763 ; Cook v. United States, 101 Ct.Cl. 782 ; Blackett v. United States, 81 Ct.Cl. 884 ; Rudd v. United States, 71 Ct.Cl. 432 .