Case law

Wason v. United States

179 Ct. Cl. 623 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 14, 1967

In the case of Lerner v. United States, 168 Ct. Cl. 247 (1964), and in Barnes v. United States, 163 Ct. … We pointed out in Friedman v. United States, 159 Ct.

Tri-Cor, Inc. v. United States

458 F.2d 112 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 14, 1972

United States v. … V.

Ray v. United States

453 F.2d 754 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 21, 1972

There can be and is no question that the correction of a record to show a retirement for disability, in order to secure tax exemption, is within Board jurisdiction. Prince v. United States, supra. … Another is Egan v. United States, 141 Ct. Cl. 1 , 158 F. Supp 377 (1958), and we do the same thing again in Bates v. United States, post, at 35, 453 F. 2d 1382 . In Hamrick v. United States, 120 Ct. Cl. 17 , 96 F.

Loral Electronics Corporation v. The United States

387 F.2d 975 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 15, 1967

The Board correctly stated that the trier must look to the facts and circumstances showing the parties’ intention at the time of the execution of the agreement. See, e. g. Benton v. … Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, 340 U.S. 474, 490 , 71 S.Ct. 456, 466 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951).

Blount Brothers Corporation v. The United States

424 F.2d 1074 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 17, 1970

Co. v. … The Board decision was signed by two members of the panel. Sternberger v. United States, 401 F.2d 1012 , 185 Ct.Cl. 528 (1968); Sundstrand Turbo v.

International Telephone & Telegraph Corp. v. United States

509 F.2d 541 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 22, 1975

Given this fact, the Board found that the Government possessed, under Radiation Technology, Inc. v. United States, 177 Ct. … For the same reasons stated in note 9 supra, this court has made these findings of fact omitted by the Board. Liles Constr. Co. v. United States, supra; Foster Const. C. A. v.

Utah Construction & Mining Co. v. United States

339 F.2d 606 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 11, 1964

Cl. 432 (1962); but the Supreme Court reversed and held that in the determination of this question we were confined to the evidence admitted before the board. United States v. … In United States v.

Joseph Bell, Sophie Karp, Hyman M. Oberman, Lena Smith, the Rainier Company, Inc., a Dissolved Corporation v. The United States

404 F.2d 975 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 13, 1968

Corp. v. … Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs Reservation v. United States, 177 Ct.Cl. 184, 207 (1966). See, also, T. C. Bateson Constr. Co. v. United States, 149 Ct.Cl. 514, 518 (1960) and River Constr. Corp. v.

United States v. Pueblo of Taos

515 F.2d 1404 · United States Court of Claims · May 14, 1975

United States v. Creek Nation, 295 U.S. 103 (1935); Chippewa Indians v. United States, 301 U.S. 358, 375 (1937). Such takings typically generate awards including interest as part of just compensation, United States v. … Our decision in Andrade v. United States, 202 Ct.

Dean Construction Co., Inc. v. The United States

411 F.2d 1238 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 20, 1969

Lee and Co., Inc. v. United States, 164 Ct.Cl. 365, 370 (1964); J. D. Hedin Constr. Co. v. United States, 347 F.2d 235, 245 , 171 Ct.Cl. 70, 84 (1965); Vulcan Rail & Constr. Co. v. … Plaintiff, however, would have us ignore these decisions on the ground that in United States v. Carlo Bianchi & Co., Inc., and United States v.

James E. Rice v. The United States

428 F.2d 1311 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 15, 1970

Compare United States v. … The review in this court of a Board decision takes place on the record made before the Board. United States v. Carlo Bianchi & Co., 373 U.S. 709 , 83 S.Ct. 1409 , 10 L.Ed.2d 652 (1963).

First National Bank v. United States

6 Cl. Ct. 241 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 5, 1984

Robert Brown, the chief operating officer at Louisa. Mr. Brown completed Louisa’s portion of the SBA application. At the time of the application, Mr. … Biagioli v. United States, 2 Cl.Ct. 304, 308 (1983); see Heckler v.

Bonen v. United States

666 F.2d 536 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 2, 1981

Eurell v. United States, 215 Ct. Cl. 273 , 566 F.2d 1146 (1977); Kirby v. United States, 201 Ct. Cl. 527 (1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 919 (1974); Mathis v. United States, 183 Ct. … Homcy v. United States, 210 Ct. Cl. 332 , 536 F.2d 360 , cert. denied, 429 U.S. 984 (1976); DeBow v. United States, supra.

Hankins v. United States

183 Ct. Cl. 32 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 15, 1968

Harmon v. Brucker, 355 U.S. 579 (1958); Hamlin v. United States, decided this day, post, at 137; Motto v. United States, supra note 1, 172 *39 Ct. Cl. 192 , 348 F. 2d 523 ; Egan v. United States, supra, 141 Ct. … Cl. 321 (1963) ; Lerner v. United States, 168 Ct. Cl. 247 (1964) ; Motto v. United States, 172 Ct. Cl. 192 , 348 P. 2d 523 (1965) ; Wason v. United States, 179 Ct. Cl. 623 (1967) ; Cosgriff v. United States, 181 Ct.

Cole v. United States

171 Ct. Cl. 178 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 11, 1965

Shapiro v. United States, 107 Ct. Cl. 650 , 69 F. Supp. 205 (1947). Cf., Service v. … Sofranoff v. United States, supra; Roberts v. Vance, No. 17801, D.C. Cir., June 18, 1964; Service v. Brilles, supra.

Buchanan v. United States

621 F.2d 373 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 2, 1980

V. … regulations that this court may interfere with the findings of the board. * * * In Boland v.

Crispino v. United States

3 Cl. Ct. 306 · United States Court of Claims · Aug 22, 1983

In Brundage v. … Generally, the decisions of the service boards will not be overturned unless a board was illegally constituted or has had improper materials presented to it or has violated applicable statutes or regulations. Savio v.

Max Jordan Bauunternehmung v. United States

33 Cont. Cas. Fed. 74,562 · United States Court of Claims · Aug 27, 1986

Co. v. United States, 185 Ct.Cl. 487 , 401 F.2d 816, 823 (1968). . Tri-Cor, Inc. v. United States, 198 Ct.Cl. 187 , 458 F.2d 112, 116 (1972). . Dynamics Corp. of America v. … Helene Curtis Indus., Inc. v. United States, 312 at 774. . H.N. Bailey & Assoc. v. United States, 449 F.2d at 382-83 . . American Ship Bldg. Co. v. United States, 654 F.2d at 79 . . United States v.

Abruzzo v. United States

513 F.2d 608 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 16, 1975

Denton v. United States, 204 Ct. Cl. 188 (1974); Mercereau v. United States, 155 Ct. Cl. 157, 158 (1961). … Trifunovich v. United States, supra at 804 n.1.

Turnbull, Inc., Individually and Turnbull, Inc., and A. & H., Inc., Co-Venturers v. The United States

389 F.2d 1007 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 20, 1967

McGraw & Co. v. … Under United States v.