Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscc

6,266 results

0.30s

  • Willcox v. United States

    3 Cl. Ct. 83 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 27, 1983

    Gilmore v. United States, supra; Monningh v. United States, supra. Parenthetically, the matter is apparently still pending before the Board. . … The only items of privileged information are the names of board members and the individual scores of the eligible officers.” . In Francis J. Wyborski v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Linair, Inc.

    25 Cont. Cas. Fed. 83,091 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 23, 1979

    The Board then went on to suggest that, despite this court’s decision in Maney Aircraft Parts, Inc. v. United States, 197 Ct. … In view of the Board’s terse dismissal for lack of jurisdiction and of its statement refusing (in effect) to follow the Maney decision, we disagree, see, Monroe M. Tapper & Assocs. v. United States, 198 Ct.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Levadi v. United States

    146 F. Supp. 455 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 5, 1956

    United States, 129 F.Supp. 958 , 132 F.Supp. 478 , 132 Ct.Cl. 1 , and the following three cases, all decided on November 8, 1955; Girault v. United States, 135 F.Supp. 521 , 133 Ct.Cl. 135 ; Duff v. … United States, 135 F.Supp. 527 , 133 Ct.Cl. 161 ; Odell v. United States, 135 F.Supp. 539 , 134 Ct.Cl. 643 ; and more recently in Levine v. United States, 137 F.Supp. 955 , 133 Ct.Cl. 774 , and MacFarlane v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Girault v. United States

    135 F. Supp. 521 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 8, 1955

    We held in Spencer v. United States, supra, and Carlin v. … Plaintiff’s later request for review by the Disability Review Board did not toll the statute. See also Mistretta v. United States, 120 F.Supp. 264 , 128 Ct.Cl. 41 , *527 45. Cf. Louis Rosnick v.

    Cited 37 timesPublished
  • Towell v. United States

    150 Ct. Cl. 422 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 8, 1960

    Holliday v. United States, 128 Ct. Cl. 647 ; Prichard v. United States, 133 Ct. Cl. 212 ; O'Brien v. United States, 124 Ct. Cl. 655 . … Boraiko v. United States, 146 Ct. Cl. 814 ; Tentative War Department Technical Manual 12-245, October 1, 1945. Plaintiff points to AR. 605-250 which states: a. Character.

    Cited 28 timesPublished
  • Rowe v. United States

    167 Ct. Cl. 468 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 17, 1964

    Murray v. United States, 154 Ct. Cl. 185, 191 (1961); Smith v. United States, 155 Ct. Cl. 682, 691 (1961); Clackum v. United States, 161 Ct. Cl. 34, 36 (1963). … Service v. Dulles, 354 U.S. 363, 388 (1957); Vitarelli v. Seaton, 359 U.S. 535, 539-540 (1959); Murray v. United States, supra, at p. 191; Smith v. United States, supra, at p. 691.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Conlin v. United States

    146 F. Supp. 833 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 5, 1956

    Rosnick v. United States, 132 C. Cls. 1 ; Girault v. United States, 133 C. Cls. 135 ; Duff v. United States, 133 C. Cls. 161 ; Odell v. United States, 134 C. Cls. 634 ; Levine v. United States, 133 C. … Cls. 774 ; Soukaras v. United States, 135 C. Cls. 88 . Plaintiff’s application to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records would not toll the running of the statute of limitations. Cuiffo v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Lykes-Youngstown Corporation v. The United States

    420 F.2d 735 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 23, 1970

    This court stated in Cresswell v. … See also The Franklin Co. v. United States, 381 F.2d 416 , 180 Ct.Cl. 666 (1967) ; City of Memphis, Tenn., etc. *744 v. Ford Motor Co., 304 F.2d 845, 849 (6th Cir. 1962).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • United Contractors, a Co-Partnership Consisting of James E. Ward, Elkin Morris and Andrew J. Dickies v. The United States

    368 F.2d 585 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 14, 1966

    Co. v. United States, Ct.Cl., 368 F.2d 847, 851 , and we consider the argument. In Nager Elec. Co. v. … Ragonese v.

    Cited 73 timesPublished
  • Anderson Snapper Boats, Inc.

    215 Ct. Cl. 998 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 16, 1977

    Donna Jean, Inc. v. United States, No. 105-77, is pending before Trial Judge White. … Leonard v. United States, No. 121-77, and Litrico v. United States, No. 517-77, are pending before Trial Judge Yock. Trial Judge Yock suspended proceedings in Leonard.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Skelly v. United States

    685 F.2d 414 · United States Court of Claims · Aug 11, 1982

    Co. v. United States, 226 Ct. … Whether or not the board decides to waive this requirement would be a matter within the board’s discretion, absent abuse of that discretion. Linair, Inc. v. United States, 219 Ct. Cl. 654 (1979); Tapper v.

    Cited 106 timesPublished
  • H & M Moving, Inc. v. United States

    499 F.2d 660 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 19, 1974

    The board noted that both sides relied on the case of United States v. … In the above case, the Ninth Circuit cited one of its earlier opinions, California State Board of Equalization v.

    Cited 65 timesPublished
  • Harris v. United States

    177 Ct. Cl. 538 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 10, 1966

    The favorable ruling of the Physical Evaluation Board (i.e., officialese for “retiring board”; see Friedman v. United States, 141 Ct. Cl. 239 , 158 F. … Again, in Hutter v. United States, 170 Ct.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Egan v. United States

    158 F. Supp. 377 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 2, 1958

    Updike v. United States, 132 F.Supp. 957 , 132 Ct. Cl. 627 ; Womer v. United States, 84 F. Supp. 651 , 114 Ct.Cl. 415 . … In Egan v. United States, 107 F.Supp. 564 , 123 Ct.Cl. 460 , amended in part by Egan v.

    Cited 24 timesPublished
  • Turnbull, Inc., Individually and Turnbull, Inc., and A. & H., Inc., Co-Venturers v. The United States

    389 F.2d 1007 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 20, 1967

    McGraw & Co. v. … Under United States v.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Marley v. United States

    423 F.2d 324 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 20, 1970

    General Builders Supply Co. v. United States, supra. The merits of the challenge to the Board’s decision are now to be considered. … Rumley v. United States, supra; Alabama Shirt & Trouser Co. v. United States, supra.

    Cited 35 timesPublished
  • BOLINDERS COMPANY v. United States

    153 F. Supp. 381 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 12, 1957

    Atlantic Corporation v. United States, 112 F.Supp. 570 , 125 Ct.Cl. 464, 480 . … Theobald Industries, Inc. v. United States, 126 Ct.Cl. 517 ; Waller v. United States, 78 F.Supp. 816 , 114 Ct.Cl. 640 ; Centaur Construction Company, Inc. v. United States, 69 F.Supp. 217 , 107 Ct.Cl. 498 .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Vaughn v. United States

    147 F. Supp. 280 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 12, 1956

    survey, or disposition board, the findings and decisions of such board * * *. … In Womer v. United States, 114 C. Cls. 415 , and other cases including Frame v. United States, 124 C. Cls. 557 , cert. den. 345 U.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Mendez v. United States

    96 F. Supp. 326 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 3, 1951

    Co. v. United States, 28 F. Supp. 916, 917, 918 ; affirmed, 308 U. … R. 1935, relating to investigations of loyalty (section 9A (1), Act of August 2, 1939, supra) and administration of Employees Loyalty Program in the Executive Branch of the Government, provided in Part V, paragraph 1, as

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Horn v. United States

    671 F.2d 1328 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 24, 1982

    V. Finally, we consider the validity of plaintiffs non-selection by the June 6,1978 statutory selection board. … As this court squarely held in Riley v. United States, 221 Ct.

    Cited 7 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.