Case law

Overlook Nursing Home, Inc. v. United States

556 F.2d 500 · United States Court of Claims · May 18, 1977

Lopez v. … Of course, the board was correct in stating the law that the Government is not bound by the unauthorized acts of its agents, Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v.

Yee v. United States

512 F.2d 1383 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 19, 1975

Orloff v. Willoughby, 345 U.S. 83 (1953); Brenner v. United States, 202 Ct. Cl. 678 (1973), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 831 (1974); Muldonian v. United States, 193 Ct. Cl. 99 , 432 F. 2d 443 (1970); Clinton v. … . § 5706 provides that a Selection Board be furnished “the records of all officers whose names are furnished to the board.” As we stated in Weiss v. United States, 187 Ct.

Johns-Manville Corp. v. United States

34 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,361 · United States Court of Claims · Aug 6, 1987

In Austin Co. v. … See Glover v.

Leesona Corp. v. United States

599 F.2d 958 · United States Court of Claims · May 16, 1979

Trial Judge Browne cited our opinion in Tektronix, Inc. v. United States, supra, as authority for the award of both items. … See Waite v. United States, 282 U.S. 508 (1931). *270 We do not calculate the delay damages from the date that the Eagle Picher contract was executed, as did Trial Judge Browne.

Waterman, Largen & Co., Inc. v. The United States

419 F.2d 845 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 14, 1969

On July 21, 1961, one month after the termination of its agency, the stock was sold to Brown at such price, resulting in a $75,000 loss. … Chase Candy Co. v. United States, 126 F.Supp. 521 , 130 Ct.Cl. 102 (1954); Duffey v. Lethert, 11 A.F.T.R. 2d 1317 (D.Minn.1963).

Koppers Company, Inc. v. The United States

405 F.2d 554 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 13, 1968

In United States v. … See River Construction Corporation v. United States, supra; also see, T. C. Bateson Construction Co. v.

Brownfield v. United States

589 F.2d 1035 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 13, 1978

In disability retirement cases the claim accrues "on final action of a board competent to pass on eligibility for disability retirement.” Dye v. United States, 166 Ct. Cl. 540, 543 , cert. denied sub nom. Hellner v. … The 1973 Board was not "the first board to consider or determine finally the claimant’s eligibility for” (Friedman v. United States, supra, 159 Ct.

James W. Clinton v. The United States

423 F.2d 1367 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 17, 1970

In Ruderer v. … Plaintiff does not allege anything to show that the Board for Correction of Military Records was arbitrary or capricious. Nealon v.

Dorl v. United States

200 Ct. Cl. 626 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 16, 1973

This court will not overturn the decision of a Correction Board without such allegations and proof. See Wood v. United States, 176 Ct. Cl. 737 (1966); and Stephens v. United States, 174 Ct. … Clinton v. United States, 191 Ct. Cl. 604 , 423 F. 2d 1367 (1970); and Arnheiter v. Ignatius, 292 F. Supp. 911 (N.D. Cal. 1968), aff'd 435 F. 2d 691 (9th Cir. 1970); and Orloff v. Willoughby, 345 U.S. 83 (1953).

Armstrong v. United States

205 Ct. Cl. 754 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 18, 1974

Unterberg v. United States, 188 Ct. Cl. 994 , 412 F. 2d 1341 (1969) ; Ward v. United States, 178 Ct. Cl. 210 (1967) ; Furlong v. United States, 153 Ct. Cl. 557 (1961). … Hutter held a correction board may be arbitrary when it follows an inaccurate ex parte opinion, an issue not present in this case, but that does not bar the board’s seeking such opinions. Merson v.

Campbell v. United States

132 F. Supp. 225 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 7, 1955

In United States v. Burchard, 125 U. … Potts v. United States, 125 U. S. 173 . Also this court has held in McBlair v. United States, 19 C. Cls. 528 ; Spencer v. United States, 121 C. Cls. 558 and Carlin v. United States, 121 C.

Ward v. United States

178 Ct. Cl. 210 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 20, 1967

Smith v. United States, 168 Ct. Cl. 545 (1964). … See Powers v. United States, 176 Ct. Cl. 388 (1966).

McCloskey & Co. v. United States

530 F.2d 374 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 28, 1976

Manning v. United States, 200 Ct. Cl. 756 (1973). This is because, as we explained in Kyer v. United States, 177 Ct. … Kyer v. United States, supra, 177 Ct. Cl. at 751 , 369 F. 2d at 718 . Our prior decisions in Buts Engineering Corp. v. United States, supra, and Breitbeck v.

Oleson v. United States

172 Ct. Cl. 9 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 16, 1965

Co. v. United States, supra; Baltimore & Ohio R.R. v. United States, supra. … See, e.g., Friedman v. United States, supra, 159 Ct. Cl. at 8 ff., 310 F. 2d at 385 ff.; Schiffman v. United States, 162 Ct. Cl. 616 , 319 F. 2d 886 (1963), Cf. Barnes v. United States, 163 Ct. Cl. 321 (1963); Lerner v.

Wickham Contracting Co. v. United States

546 F.2d 395 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 15, 1976

Parenthetically, plaintiff challenges this Board finding on the sole ground that it is irrelevant. Such a challenge, under the circumstances, is without merit. The Board noted that use of a V scale was unusual. … It certainly did not act reasonably under the circumstances and the Board rightly denied its claim. See Ling-Temco-Vought, Inc. v. United States, 201 Ct. Cl. 135 , 475 F. 2d 630 (1973); see also Snyder Corp. v.

Edward Kowal v. The United States

412 F.2d 867 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 16, 1969

See, e. g., Koppers Co. v. … United States, 164 Ct.Cl. 438, 445 (1964); Finn v. United States, 152 Ct.Cl. 1, 5-7 (1961); Bryant v.

Northbridge Electronics, Inc. v. The United States

444 F.2d 1124 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 14, 1971

On cross-motions based upon the record before the Board, the court held that the Board had erred — that the Government was liable. Northbridge Electronics, Inc. v. United States, 175 Ct.Cl. 426 (1966). … Sternberger v. United States, 401 F.2d 1012, 1015-1016 , 185 Ct.Cl. 528, 533-536 (1968); Electronic and Missile Facilities, Inc. v. United States, 189 Ct.Cl. 237, 251 , 416 F.2d 1345, 1354 (1969); Rice v.

Price v. United States

149 F. Supp. 181 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 6, 1957

Moreover, plaintiff’s right to sue in this court accrued, if at all, when the Disposition Board on June 30, 1945, found her fit for general duty, instead of ordering her before a Retiring Board. MacFarlane v. … Cls. 755 ; Girault v. United States, 133 C. Cls. 135 ; Odell v. United *687 States, 134 C. Cls. 634 ; Rosnick v. United States, 132 C. Cls. 1 , rehearing denied 132 C. Cls. 6 .

Murphy v. United States

16 Cl. Ct. 385 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 2, 1989

Brooks v. United States, 209 Ct.Cl. 704 (1976). In Abruzzo v. … In Guy v.

Arthur Venneri Company v. The United States

381 F.2d 748 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 20, 1967

Roads Co. v. United States, 355 F.2d 612, 615 , 173 Ct.Cl. 714, 720 (1965); John Reiner & Co. v. … Co. v. United States, 368 F.2d 847 177 Ct.Cl. -, (1966) and Crown Coat Front Co. v.