Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscc

1,638 results

0.78s

  • Select Tire Salvage Co., Inc. v. The United States. The Connecticut Tire Company, Inc. v. The United States

    386 F.2d 1008 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 15, 1967

    News 1956, p. 2822, it is clearly stated that the qualifying language was added so that only highway type tires would bear the burden of the additional tax to be then imposed, because the additional revenue was to be *1010 … The sole purpose of the qualifying language was to provide a basis for distinguishing between highway type and non-highway type tires.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • J. F. Hodgkins Company (1), Kingman Marine Construction, Inc. (2), and Palmer & Parker Co. (3) v. The United States

    318 F.2d 932 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 21, 1963

    The purchase orders issued by Rice to cover these transactions clearly indicated that the items ordered therein were to be used for the execution of contract NObs-3572. … True, it is established by law, but it is affixed to, and cannot exist without a contract.” [Fuller v. Nickerson, 69 Me. 228, 236 (1879).] 2 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Mobley ex rel. Mobley v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services

    22 Cl. Ct. 423 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 18, 1991

    A qualified petitioner who receives an injury listed on the Vaccine Injury Table, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-14(a) (Table), within the time period prescribed by the Table is entitled to compensation unless a preponderance of the evidence … Borkowf, a pediatric neurologist, recorded that she did “not know when Joshua first manifested symptoms of encephalopathy following his second DPT immunization.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Duncan v. United States

    597 F.2d 1337 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 18, 1979

    While not expressly stating that the United States held the land as trustee, Congress clearly contemplated that this land have the same status as reservation lands. … Congress need not expressly use a talismanic phrase such as "trust relationship” or "hold in trust” in order to establish a trust relationship. See Cherry v. United States, 219 Ct.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Bortin v. United States

    138 F. Supp. 251 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 31, 1956

    By reason of this experience he might also qualify as a rating specialist. However, the knowledge gained as a rating specialist did not of itself qualify an employee to be an assistant adjudication officer. … The record clearly shows that your previous reassignment from the position of Assistant Adjudication Officer, GS-12 (P-5), to a position of Bating Specialist, GS-12 (P-5), was a lateral reassignment in grade and salary.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Adams v. United States

    3 Cl. Ct. 696 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 31, 1983

    Adams, B-204522 (Mar. 23, 1982), rejecting plaintiff’s argument that the leave so forfeited qualified for restoration under 5 U.S.C. § 6304 (d) (Supp. … This statutory provision is clearly inapplicable. Section 6304(d) is quoted supra note 4.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Aflague v. United States

    309 F.2d 753 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 7, 1962

    That provision clearly covers enlisted men as well as officers previously retired for disability. … He was, accordingly, released from active duty and classified as not physically qualified for mobilization ashore.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Instrument Systems Corp. v. United States

    546 F.2d 357 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 15, 1976

    In Aero Spacelines and Butkin, supra, we have established lenient *109 standards as to what constitutes a prima facie case. … Of course, it should clearly identify the documents to be discovered or used.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Franco-Italian Packing Co. v. United States

    128 F. Supp. 408 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 8, 1955

    Pacific Railroad, 120 U.S. 227 , 7 S.Ct. 490 , 30 L.Ed. 634 , established the rule that the sovereign is immune from liability for confiscation of private property taken by defendant, through destruction or otherwise, to … Therefore, such statements by Commander Waite, if they were made, do not establish a taking of plaintiff’s property. 4 The record conclusively establishes that plaintiff’s property was not appropriated by the defendant for

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Sico Foundation v. United States

    295 F.2d 924 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 1, 1961

    As Judge Littleton pointed out in the first Sico decision, the law prior to 1951 had been rather clearly established that the destination of an organization’s income was more important than the source of its income for purposes … The record clearly establishes that these scholarships have served to increase student attendance and hence have resulted in the training of more qualified public school teachers than might otherwise have been true.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Jordan v. United States

    205 Ct. Cl. 65 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 19, 1974

    He is qualified for retention on active duty, physically. … Attempts at establishing an etiological diagnosis was not pursued.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. United States

    53 Ct. Cl. 238 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 25, 1918

    Booth, Judge, reviewing the facts found to be established, delivered the opinion of the court. The record in this case affords no opportunity for an issue of fact. … The evidence is made up of official reports from the Post Office Department and clearly discloses the exact situation.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Deluxe Check Printers, Inc. v. United States

    14 Cl. Ct. 782 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 28, 1988

    . § 509 and is duly qualified as a non-profit corporation under 26 U.S.C. § 501 (c)(3). … Indeed, facts judicially admitted are facts established not only beyond the need of evidence to prove them, but beyond the power of evidence to controvert them.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Harris v. United States

    177 Ct. Cl. 538 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 10, 1966

    It is no doubt true that annual qualifying physicals in the reserves are often cursory affairs that are not definitive of actual ailments, and equally true that plaintiff was strongly induced to conceal physical defects due … consideration to this staff recommendation, as presumably it did, it would not cure or relieve the deficiency of the report which the Board rendered to the claimant and to the Secretary as a recommendation, for that report quite clearly

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Burns v. United States

    9 Cl. Ct. 273 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 5, 1985

    Instead, “the court must uphold the rule even though it may seem unwise or that a more just system could clearly be devised.” … Moreover, he would (if qualified) have been accorded the benefit of 10 U.S.C. § 1163 (d) (1976). And, in any event, his right to earn retirement credits, and to qualify for retirement benefits, was not terminated.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • DeMat Air, Inc. v. United States

    30 Cont. Cas. Fed. 70,980 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 25, 1983

    Plaintiff claims to qualify for special consideration in the procurement process, pursuant to the terms of the instant solicitation, as a “small business” entity (which is conceded by defendant). … The court should not substitute its judgment on such matters for that of the agency, but should intervene only when it is clearly determined that the agency’s determinations were irrational or unreasonable.

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • Louis L. Walters v. The United States

    358 F.2d 957 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 15, 1966

    In December of 1954, the Bureau of Medicine and Surgery rated plaintiff physically qualified for recall to active duty incident only to mobilization. … The evidence presented to the Correction Board some nine years later, however, establishes in retrospect quite clearly that plaintiff’s condition was incapacitating and permanent.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Moore-Mccormack Lines, Inc. v. The United States. American President Lines, Ltd. v. The United States. Delta Steamship Lines, Inc. v. The United States. American Export Isbrandtsen Lines, Inc. v. The United States

    413 F.2d 568 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 16, 1969

    But there was no indication, explicit or implicit, of the immunity of subsidy decisions to judicial review. … Those qualifying terms are wholly antithetic to any absolute discretion in the administrators to set their own process. 45 C.

    Cited 45 timesPublished
  • Laird v. United States

    16 Cl. Ct. 441 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 16, 1989

    On appeal, the husband had argued that the trial court erred in establishing the property division because the trial court failed to consider the tax consequences of the proposed stock transfer in light of the Davis case. … The purpose of this amendment was clearly to avoid the tax consequences of United States v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Rye v. United States

    25 Cl. Ct. 592 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 30, 1992

    For the reasons which follow, the court holds that the 1980 Revision Act amendments to § 453 do not alter that established rule. … should qualify as an installment sale for income tax purposes.

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.