Case law

Olds & Whipple, Inc. v. United States

22 F. Supp. 809 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 4, 1938

The case of Hoosac Mills Corporation et al. v. … United States, 7 F.Supp. 492 , 79 Ct.Cl. 736 ; Wood v. United States, 17 F.Supp, 521, 84 Ct.Cl. 367 ; Clifton Mfg. Co. v.

Lins v. United States

4 Cl. Ct. 772 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 22, 1984

Brown v. Felsen, supra, 442 U.S. at 131 , 99 S.Ct. at 2209 ; see also Hasson v. United States, 220 Ct.Cl. 615 , 618 F.2d 121 (1979). … See Nash County Board of Education v. Biltmore Co., 640 F.2d 484, 493 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 878 , 102 S.Ct. 359 , 70 L.Ed.2d 188 (1981); Boruski v.

B. D. Click Co. v. United States

614 F.2d 748 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 23, 1980

Our review is limited to whether the Board’s findings are fraudulent, arbitrary, capricious, so erroneous as to imply bad faith, or not supported by substantial evidence. United States v. … the board.

Stewart v. United States

611 F.2d 1356 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 12, 1979

See also Tanaka v. United States, 210 Ct. Cl. 712 (1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 955 (1977); and orders in Borgford v. United States, Wilson v. United States, and Duggan v. United States, 221 Ct. … Doyle v. United States, supra, 220 Ct. Cl. at 311 , 599 F.2d at 1000 ; Borgford v. United States, supra.

Nibali v. United States

589 F.2d 514 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 13, 1978

Universal Camera Corp. v. … National Labor Relations Board, 208 F.2d 296, 303-04 (8th Cir. 1953); Victor Products Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, 208 F.2d 834, 838-39 (D.C. Cir. 1953); National Labor Relations Board v.

Cook v. United States

536 F.2d 365 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 16, 1976

See, e.g., Mitchell v. W. T. Grant Co., 416 U.S. 600, 610 (1974). … [Arnett v. Kennedy, 416 U.S. 134, 155 (1974)]. In the instant case, both Cook and the Government had an identical interest in the accuracy, completeness and quality of the medical evidence presented to the Board.

Levine v. United States

137 F. Supp. 955 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 31, 1956

Rosnick v. United States, D.C., 129 F.Supp. 958 , rehearing denied, D.C., 132 F.Supp. 478 . This case is indistinguishable from the cases of Rosnick v. United States, supra; Girault v. … United States, Ct.Cl., 135 F.Supp. 521 ; Duff v. United States, Ct.Cl., 135 F.Supp. 527 ; and Odell v.

New York Airways, Inc. v. The United States. Los Angeles Airways, Inc. v. The United States. Chicago Helicopter Airways, Inc. v. The United States

369 F.2d 743 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 16, 1966

But in Gibney v. … R. v.

Borgford

618 F.2d 124 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 26, 1979

See also Savio v. United States, 213 Ct. Cl. 737 , 740 (1977); Reid v. United States, ante at 864. 2. Plaintiff asserts that the Correction Board committed legal error by failing to grant her a hearing. … There was nothing improper in the Correction Board’s seeking and the Review Board’s submitting this material. Cf. Flute v. United States, supra; Weiss v. United States, 187 Ct. Cl. 1 , 408 F.2d 416 (1969); Proper v.

Contract Custom Drapery Service, Inc. v. United States

32 Cont. Cas. Fed. 73,105 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 5, 1984

Instrument, Inc. v. United States, 715 F.2d 713, 728 (2d Cir.1983); Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. Brown, 600 F.2d 429, 432-33 (3d Cir.1979); Cincinnati Electronics Corp. v. … In the context of the Board’s lack of jurisdiction over the claim before it, as discussed previously, such a finding is deemed of no significance.

Lehigh Portland Cement Co. v. United States

30 F. Supp. 217 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 4, 1939

See Delaware Railroad Co. v. Prettyman, Fed.Cas.No.3767; Kensett v. Stivers, C.C., 10 F. 517 . … The case of United States v.

Hertzog v. United States

167 Ct. Cl. 377 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 17, 1964

In Eicks v. United States, 145 Ct. … In Proper v. United States, 139 Ct.

Dayley v. United States

169 Ct. Cl. 305 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 22, 1965

Lipp v. United States, supra; Friedman v. United States, supra; Robinson v. United States, 163 Ct. Cl. 235 (1963); Merriott v. United States, 163 Ct. Cl. 261 (1963), cert. denied, 379 U.S. 838 (1964); Dye v. … Aspen Mining & Smelting Co. v. Billings, 150 U.S. 31, 35-37 (1893) ; Wayne United Gas Co. v.

Brown

226 Ct. Cl. 689 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 20, 1981

Brown v. United States, Ct. Cl. No. 490-76; Brown v. … In Brown v. United States, Ct. Cl.

Joseph Sternberger, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Spenco, Inc. v. The United States

401 F.2d 1012 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 18, 1968

Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, 340 U.S. 474, 488 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951). … Cf. *1018 Universal Camera Corp. v. Labor Board, supra, 340 U.S. at 493 , 71 S.Ct. 456 (1951).

Backus v. United States

59 F.2d 242 · United States Court of Claims · May 31, 1932

The compromise and settlement agreement, together with the judgments of the board, became effective as a bar to a subsequent suit. Zemurray v. United States, 64 Ct. Cl. 657 . Du Puy v. United States, 67 Ct. … The Peruna Co. v. Commissioner, 11 B. T. A. 1180; Peerless Woolen Mills v. Commissioner, 13 B. T. A. 1119.

Engels v. United States

678 F.2d 173 · United States Court of Claims · May 5, 1982

See Horn v. United States, ante at 18; Evensen v. United States, 228 Ct. Cl. 207 , 654 F.2d 68 (1981); Grieg v. United States, 226 Ct. Cl. 258 , 640 F.2d 1261 (1981); Gruendyke v. United States, 226 Ct. … Cl. 193 , 639 F.2d 745 (1981); Hary v. United States, 223 Ct. Cl. 10 , 618 F.2d 704 (1976); Guy v. United States, 221 Ct. Cl. 427 , 608 F.2d 867 (1979); Riley v. United States, 221 Ct.

Tapper & Associates v. United States

458 F.2d 66 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 14, 1972

Schacht v. United States, 398 U.S. 58, 63-65, 66-69 (1970). The Government’s rights under the clause do not “vest” until the Board refuses to take jurisdiction 'because of untimeliness. … Co. v. United States, 186 Ct. Cl. 953 , 954 (1908), and Arthur Venneri Co. v. United States, 180 Ct. Cl. 920 , 925 n. 3, 381 F. 2d 748 , 751 n. 3 (1967).

Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. United States

64 Ct. Cl. 256 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 7, 1927

Brown, president, and C. R. … Schnacke, acting in his official capacity, and was duly approved by the claims board for the Air Service, without which approval the contract, as provided in its terms, was not to become a valid and binding obligation of

Martin Merson v. The United States

401 F.2d 184 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 4, 1968

In Powers v. … Most recently, in the case of Brown v.