Case law

Furlong v. United States

152 F. Supp. 238 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 5, 1957

All of these cases followed our previous decisions in Rosnick v. United States, 129 F.Supp. 958 , 132 Ct.Cl. 1 ; Girault v. United States, 135 F.Supp. 521 , 133 Ct.Cl. 135 ; Duff v. … This justified the retiring board and the Secretary in entertaining his application made five months after his discharge. Cf. Updike v. United States, 132 F.Supp. 957 , 132 Ct.Cl. 627 ; Vaughn v.

Frank E. Lipp v. The United States

301 F.2d 674 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 4, 1962

Levine v. United States, 137 *676 F.Supp. 955, 133 Ct.Cl. 774 ; Rosnick v. United States, 132 F.Supp. 478 , 132 Ct. Cl. 1 ; Girault v. United States, supra; Duff v. … In Girault v. United States, supra, it was held that “All of these boards, * * * act only in an advisory capacity to the Secretary of War.

Hamrick v. United States

96 F. Supp. 940 · United States Court of Claims · May 1, 1951

also before us in Womer v. … See Robertson v. Chambers, 341 U.S. 37 , 71 S.Ct. 547 . The review board had the same powers exercised by or vested in the original retiring board.

Williams International Corp. v. United States

32 Cont. Cas. Fed. 73,405 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 12, 1985

See Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 317, 319 , 99 S.Ct. 1705, 1725, 1726 , 60 L.Ed.2d 208 (1979); Megapulse, Inc. v. Lewis, 672 F.2d 959, 969-71 (D.C.Cir.1982). … Goewey v. United States, 222 Ct.Cl. 104, 108 , 612 F.2d 539, 541 (1979). In both Chrysler v. Brown, supra, and Megapulse v.

Nibali v. United States

589 F.2d 514 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 13, 1978

Universal Camera Corp. v. … National Labor Relations Board, 208 F.2d 296, 303-04 (8th Cir. 1953); Victor Products Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, 208 F.2d 834, 838-39 (D.C. Cir. 1953); National Labor Relations Board v.

Albright v. United States

26 Cl. Ct. 1119 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 11, 1992

In Beall v. … Brown 44. Larry D. Brown 45. 46. Melvin Brown, Jr. 47. Jerry W. Burns 48. Warren E. Burton 49. Richard S. Byrd 50. Francis B. Caddell 51. Terry L. Cain 52. 53. George B. Carpenter 54. Richard S. Carter 55. Donna S.

Ohio Steel Foundry Co. v. United States

38 F.2d 144 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 17, 1930

See, also, Elmhurst Investment Co. et al. v. United States (D. … Buck v. Colbath, 3 Wall. 334 , 18 L. Ed. 257 ; Heidritter v. Elizabeth Oil Cloth Co., 112 U. S. 294 , 5 S. Ct. 135 , 28 L. Ed. 729 ; Rodgers v. Pitt et al. (C. C.) 96 F. 668 , affirmed in Pitt v. Rodgers (C. C.

Guy v. United States

608 F.2d 867 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 17, 1979

See, e.g., Sanders v. United States, supra; Skinner v. United States, supra. … Riley v. United States, ante at 312, quoting Sanders v. United States, supra, 219 Ct. Cl. at 285, 594 F.2d at 814. See also Yee v. United States, 206 Ct. Cl. 388 , 512 F.2d 1383 (1975); Weiss v. United States, 187 Ct.

Riley v. United States

608 F.2d 441 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 19, 1979

See also Yee v. United States, 206 Ct. Cl. 388 , 512 F.2d 1383 (1975); Weiss v. United States, 187 Ct. Cl. 1, 408 F.2d 416 (1969). … Riley v. United States, 204 Ct. Cl. 865 (1974).

The Washington Post Company v. The United States

405 F.2d 1279 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 24, 1969

See, e. g., United States v. Anderson, 269 U.S. 422 , 46 S.Ct. 131 , 70 L.Ed. 347 (1926); Lucas v. American Code Co., 280 U.S. 445 , *1283 50 S.Ct. 202 , 74 L.Ed. 538 (1930); Brown v. … Thus, in Clark v. Woodward Constr.

Miller v. United States

104 F. Supp. 981 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 3, 1952

Kimberly v. United States, 119 C. Cls. 805 ). … Brown, 333 U. S. 18 ).

Boyd v. United States

207 Ct. Cl. 1 · United States Court of Claims · May 14, 1975

Orloff v. Willoughby, 345 U.S. 83, 94 (1953); Mindes v. Seaman, 453 F. 2d 197 (1971). … The function of the Secretary and of a selection board as to appointments and promotions is discretionary and their actions cannot be presumed. Cooper v. United States, supra; Clinton v. United States, 191 Ct.

Olds & Whipple, Inc. v. United States

22 F. Supp. 809 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 4, 1938

The case of Hoosac Mills Corporation et al. v. … United States, 7 F.Supp. 492 , 79 Ct.Cl. 736 ; Wood v. United States, 17 F.Supp, 521, 84 Ct.Cl. 367 ; Clifton Mfg. Co. v.

Comstock v. United States

9 Ct. Cl. 141 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 15, 1873

(Fitch v. Sutton, 5 East R., p. 232.) … (Kirkham & Brown’s Case, 4 C. Cls. R., p. 223.)

Rosnick v. United States

129 F. Supp. 958 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 5, 1955

The complaint finally rests upon the error, if any, of the Army Retiring Board made on December 12, 1945. Group v. United States, 125 Ct. Cl. 135 ; Thomas v. United States, 125 Ct.Cl. 76 . … Both parties cite the case of Uhley v. United States, 128 Ct.Cl. 608 .

Stewart v. United States

611 F.2d 1356 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 12, 1979

See also Tanaka v. United States, 210 Ct. Cl. 712 (1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 955 (1977); and orders in Borgford v. United States, Wilson v. United States, and Duggan v. United States, 221 Ct. … Doyle v. United States, supra, 220 Ct. Cl. at 311 , 599 F.2d at 1000 ; Borgford v. United States, supra.

Powers v. United States

176 Ct. Cl. 388 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 10, 1966

See also par. 50, AR 40-105, October 14, 1942 (finding 25(g)) ; Brown v. United States, 143 Ct. Cl. 605 (1958) ; Frederick v. United States, 150 Ct. Cl. 769 , 280 F. 2d 844 (1960) ; Ludzinski v. United States, 154 Ct. … Cl. 215 (1961) ; Woodard v. United States, 167 Ct. Cl. 306 (1964). Hearings before boards sueb as the Correction Board “are not contests; they are inquiries concerning disability.

New York Airways, Inc. v. The United States. Los Angeles Airways, Inc. v. The United States. Chicago Helicopter Airways, Inc. v. The United States

369 F.2d 743 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 16, 1966

But in Gibney v. … R. v.

Levine v. United States

137 F. Supp. 955 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 31, 1956

Rosnick v. United States, D.C., 129 F.Supp. 958 , rehearing denied, D.C., 132 F.Supp. 478 . This case is indistinguishable from the cases of Rosnick v. United States, supra; Girault v. … United States, Ct.Cl., 135 F.Supp. 521 ; Duff v. United States, Ct.Cl., 135 F.Supp. 527 ; and Odell v.

Adams v. United States

23 Ct. Cl. 226 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 2, 1888

Brown, minister to France, *238 dated December 23,1823, Mr. J. Q. … Brown, dated May 28,1827 (id., p. 5). In 1829 (July 20) Mr. Van Burén instructed Mr.