Case law

John A. Henneberger v. The United States

403 F.2d 237 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 15, 1968

A board of officers carefully considered all actions and events pertaining to your separation. … Ex parte Reed, 100 U.S. 13, 22 , 25 L.Ed. 538 (1879); Prichard v. United States, 135 F.Supp. 420, 422 , 133 Ct.Cl. 212, 216 (1955); Ludzinski v. United States, 154 Ct.Cl. 215, 230 (1961); Moran Bros., Inc. v.

Crager v. United States

16 Cl. Ct. 269 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 6, 1989

See Denby v. … Berry, 263 U.S. 29 , 44 S.Ct. 74 , 68 L.Ed. 148 (1923) (plaintiff alleges that his release from active service and the Secretary of the Navy's refusal to refer his case to a retiring board was improper); Alberico v.

McKeague v. United States

12 Cl. Ct. 671 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 1, 1987

Count XI Injunction: Barred counsel at board and shareholders’ meetings. … The attendance of McKeague’s counsel at the board meetings would have created an incentive to board members to follow the guidelines set out in formal agreements.

Union Pacific Corp. v. United States

26 Cl. Ct. 739 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 30, 1992

See Railroad Retirement Board v. Duquesne Warehouse Co., 326 U.S. at 451, 66 S.Ct. at 240 . … See Itel Corp. v. United States Railroad Retirement Board, 710 F.2d 1243 (7th Cir.1983); Mbsouri Pacific Truck Lines, Inc. v.

Conoc Construction Corp. v. United States

31 Cont. Cas. Fed. 71,371 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 29, 1983

On January 5, 1982, Conoe appealed the contracting officer’s final decision to the Corps of Engineers Board of Contract Appeals. … Arlington Alliance, Ltd. v. United States, 231 *148 Ct.Cl.—, 685 F.2d 1353, 1359 (1982). Accord, W.M. Schlosser Co. v. United States, 705 F.2d 1336 (Fed.Cir.1983); Skelly and Loy v.

Tree Preservation Co. v. United States

172 Ct. Cl. 577 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 16, 1965

In dismissing plaintiff’s appeal, the Board found that there was no evidence of misrepresentation, but that the matter sounded in breach of contract over which the Board had no jurisdiction to grant relief. 1 Plaintiff initially … Associated Traders, Inc. v. United States, 144 a. Cl. 744, 169 F. Supp. 502 (1959).

Bentley v. United States

189 Ct. Cl. 547 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 12, 1969

Smelcer v. United States, 130 Ct. Cl. 510 , 127 F. Supp. 607 (1955) was a much stronger case than is presented here. … The cases cited by the defendant are controlling here, particularly Drake America Corporation v. United States, 168 Ct. Cl. 318 (1964) and Hellander v. United States, 147 Ct. Cl. 550 , 178 F. Supp. 932 (1959).

Bendix Corp. v. United States

676 F.2d 606 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 24, 1982

OPINION OF TRIAL JUDGE BROWNE, Trial Judge: I. … V. Sanctions Trial Judge Browne assessed damages against defendant in the amount of $534 as sanctions for the government’s refusal to specifically comply with his pretrial order.

Architects Building Corp. v. United States

98 Ct. Cl. 368 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 1, 1943

The general rule is, and has been consistently followed since Clark v. United States, 95 U. … Rankin, Sole Surviving and Liquidating Member of the Partnership Firm of Rankin & Kellogg v.

Western Pennsylvania Horological Institute, Inc. v. United States

146 Ct. Cl. 540 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 13, 1959

Co. v. United States, 164 U.S. 190 , and cases cited therein. … Federal Crop Insurance Corp. v. Merrill, 332 U.S. 380 .

Fireman's Fund Insurance Company v. The United States

421 F.2d 706 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 20, 1970

Co. v. United States, 169 F.Supp. 955 , 144 Ct.Cl. 655 (1959), and Home Indem. Co. v. … Co. v. United States, supra, was based.

International Electronics Corp. v. United State

31 Cont. Cas. Fed. 71,240 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 3, 1983

The United States Court of Claims reviewed a decision of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (Board) * » on plaintiff International Electronics Corporation’s claim under the Wunderlich Act, 41 U.S.C. §§ 321-322 ( … Upon remand to the Board, the parties negotiated a settlement and the appeals were dismissed from its docket.

International Aircraft Trading Co. v. United States

75 F. Supp. 261 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 6, 1947

Per Curiam : For the reasons set out in the opinion filed on July 7, 1947, in the case of Van Karner Chemical Arms Corporation v. … Why the Netherlands Government should have been willing to pay $100.00 each for these rebuilt outmoded guns, when they could have gotten a modern Browning gun for about $76.00, needs explanation, to say the least.

Baker v. United States

231 Ct. Cl. 779 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 2, 1982

Cason v. United States, 200 Ct.Cl. 424 , 471 F.2d 1225 (1973). … We said in Frommhagen v.

Indiana Retail Hardware Association, Inc. v. The United States

366 F.2d 998 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 14, 1966

As we said in Evanston-North Shore Board of Realtors v. … Evanston-North Shore Board of Realtors v. United States, supra, 320 F.2d at 382, 162 Ct.Cl. at 694 .

Torncello v. United States

681 F.2d 756 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 16, 1982

to the Board for determination of the factual issues; otherwise, litigation would be protracted and unnecessary delay and expense would result simply in order to have the Board formally decide a fact which legally can be … John Reiner & Co. v. United States, 163 Ct. Cl. 381 , 325 F.2d 438 (1963), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 931 (1964) (irregularity in the bid award); Brown & Son Elec. Co. v. United States, 163 Ct.

Charles C. Harper v. The United States

312 F.2d 436 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 11, 1963

I concur with what we said in Friedman v. … Nor do I think it conflicts with either Proper v. United States, 139 Ct.Cl. 511 , 154 F.Supp. 317 , or Patterson v. United States, 141 Ct.Cl. 435 . In both of them plaintiff’s malady -was discovered after his discharge.

Brinck v. United States

53 Ct. Cl. 170 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 25, 1918

In March, 1907, the claims of the contractors were referred to a board of engineers, and that board made a report upon said claims on April 5,1907. … Kihlberg v.

Barnes v. United States

105 F. Supp. 817 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 15, 1952

In the case of Horowitz v. … McCrary Company v. United States, 84 F.Supp. 368 , 114 Ct.Cl. 12, 35 .

C.L. Michner, Inc.

618 F.2d 121 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 20, 1979

This case is one of three appealed to the court from a denial of an equitable adjustment by the Department of the Army Corps of Engineers Board of Contract Appeals. … Co. v. United States, Docket No. 277-77, is discussed ante at 639. On April 20, 1979 the court, by order, adopted the recommended decision of Trial Judge Robert J.