Case law

Stevens Park Osteopathic Hospital, Inc. v. United States

633 F.2d 1373 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 10, 1980

In both instances, on appeal from the board, the deputy administrator reversed stating first that the board had exceeded its authority under 42 C.F.R. §405.1867 , which regulation requires the board to comply with Title XVIII … See Hillside Community Hospital of Ukiah v. Mathews, supra; Caylor-Nickel Hospital, Inc. v. Secretary of HEW, Civil No. F77-83 (N.D. Ind. 1979); and Chelsea Community Hospital v.

Fry Communications, Inc. v. United States

22 Cl. Ct. 497 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 5, 1991

Fruin-Colnon Corp. v. United States, 912 F.2d at 1430 (quoting Lear-Siegler Management Serv. v. United States, 867 F.2d at 603 ). … See United States v.

Wolfe

224 Ct. Cl. 613 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 10, 1980

Defendant’s motion for summary judgment asserts that this court has no jurisdiction to hear this discrimination case, relying on Brown v. General Services Administration, 425 U. S. 820, 829 (1976). … Brown held that section 717(c) of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16 (1970 ed„ Supp.

Wunderlich Contracting Co. v. United States

351 F.2d 956 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 15, 1965

McGraw & Co. v. United States, supra; River Construction Corp. v. United States, 159 Ct. Cl. 254 (1962); Laburnum Construction Corp. v. United States, supra. … Horowitz v. United States, 267 U.S. 458 (1926) ; Jones v. United States, 1 Ct. Cl. 383 (1865); Wah Chang Corp. v. United States, 151 Ct. Cl. 41 , 282 F. 2d 728 (1960); Anthony P. Miller, Inc. v. United States, 161 Ct.

Gooch v. United States

15 Ct. Cl. 281 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 15, 1879

(Lamar v. Browne, 92 U. S., 187 .) In the State in which it was taken, that state of war continued until April 2, 1866. (The Protector, 12 Wall., 702 .) … (United States v. Anderson, 2 Wall., 404 ; United States v. Pad- *288 elford, 9 Wall., 540 ; Haycraft v. United States, 22 Wall., 81 ; Lamar v. Browne, 92 U. S., 187 .)

Mann v. United States

44 F.2d 1005 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 3, 1930

In affirming the decision of the United States Board of Tax Appeals on the question of the statute of limitation in Paso Robles Mercantile Co. v. … Plaintiff cites the decision of the Board of Tax Appeals in Appeal of Mabel Elevator Co., supra, and the court in United States v.

Reade v. United States

14 Cl. Ct. 531 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 25, 1988

Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. at 324, 106 S.Ct. at 2553-54 . A movant for summary judgment has the burden of showing the absence of genuine issues as to any material facts. Adickes v. … See, e.g., Grieg, v. United States, 640 F.2d 1261, 1268-69 , 226 Ct.Cl. 258 (1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 907 , 102 S.Ct. 1251 , 71 L.Ed.2d 444 (1982); *535 Skinner v.

Leiner v. United States

181 F. Supp. 400 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 8, 1958

By letter dated December 28, 1954, the Board so advised the Post Office Department. … Cole v.

Roland

155 Ct. Cl. 823 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 1, 1961

. — Plaintiff, a former Army enlisted man, sues to recover active duty pay and allowances lost following his dishonorable discharge from the Army pursuant to general court-martial, affirmed by the Board of Eeview and the … the respective responses and oral argument by the parties, it was ordered on November 1, 1961, that the court having concluded that it lacked jurisdiction over this type of claim under the ruling of the court in Begalke v.

Feldman v. United States

181 F. Supp. 393 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 3, 1960

This court held in Goodwin v. … See Goodwin v. United States, 118 F.

Deering v. United States

620 F.2d 242 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 16, 1980

Kg., Sanders v. United States, 219 Ct. Cl. 285, 301 , 594 F.2d 804, 813 (1979); Tanaka v. United States, 210 Ct. Cl. 712 (1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 955 (1977). … Brundage v. United States, 205 Ct.Cl. 502 , 504 F.2d 1382 (1974), cert. denied, 421 U.S. 998 (1975); Cason v. United States (Cason II), 200 Ct. Cl. 424 , 471 F.2d 1225 (1973).

Molony & Rubien Construction Co.

566 F.2d 1189 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 8, 1977

Plaintiffs appeal to the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals was dismissed for want of jurisdiction; at the Board level, claimant relied only on its oral contract theory and the Board held that it had no authority to … See, e.g., Operational Manuals, Inc. v. United States, 205 Ct. Cl. 854, 856 (1974); Porter v. United States, 204 Ct. Cl. 355, 366 , 496 F.2d 583, 590-91 (1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 1004 (1975).

Earle v. United States

3 F. Supp. 849 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 5, 1933

May 24, 1928, the plaintiff’s contention was sustained by the Board of Tax Appeals and a decision was entered that there was no deficiency for 1917. … In the case of David Daube v. United States, 53 S. Ct. 597, 598 , 77 L.

Hrdina v. United States

5 Cl. Ct. 17 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 30, 1984

The argument draws upon the resultsreached in Istivan v. … Bennett v. United States, 200 Ct.Cl. 635, 644 (1973); de Cicco v. United States, 230 Ct.Cl. 224, 231 , 677 F.2d 66, 71 (1982).

Georgia Wholesale Co. v. United States

84 Ct. Cl. 150 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 7, 1936

See Roehm v. Horst, 178 U. S. 1 ; Lovell et al. v. St. Louis Mutual Life Insurance Co., supra; Gray & co. Inc., v. Cavalliotis, 276 Fed. 565, 570 . … United States v. Koplin, 24 Fed. (2d) 840; Jacob Levy & Bros. v. United States, 63 C. Cls. 126 ; Lamport Manufacturing Supply Co. v. United States, 65 C. Cls. 579 ; American Stores Co. v.

Connor v. United States

13 F. Supp. 455 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 3, 1936

In Mutual Chemical Co. of America v. … See *466 also Bourne et al. v. United States, 2 F. Supp. 228 , 76 Ct.Cl. 680 . The defendant relies upon Pratt & Whitney Co. v.

Lemly v. United States

91 F. Supp. 743 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 10, 1950

His requests for retirement were reviewed by an informal review board of five doctors in the Navy Department’s Medical Corps who considered plaintiff’s case on the merits. … In Rhodes v. United States, 79 Fed. 740 , where the Court of Appeals of the 8th Circuit was called upon to construe Rev. Stat.

Christensen MacH. Co. v. United States

50 F.2d 282 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 1, 1931

of Tax Appeals in determining the -same question between the same parties, that (Christensen Machine *287 Company v. … As the Board of Tax Appeals states in its opinion (Christensen Machine Co. v. Commissioner, supra) : “ * * * Christensen was leaving. Ho had been the most important person in the business.

Crager v. United States

16 Cl. Ct. 269 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 6, 1989

See Denby v. … Berry, 263 U.S. 29 , 44 S.Ct. 74 , 68 L.Ed. 148 (1923) (plaintiff alleges that his release from active service and the Secretary of the Navy's refusal to refer his case to a retiring board was improper); Alberico v.

Bendix Corp. v. United States

676 F.2d 606 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 24, 1982

OPINION OF TRIAL JUDGE BROWNE, Trial Judge: I. … V. Sanctions Trial Judge Browne assessed damages against defendant in the amount of $534 as sanctions for the government’s refusal to specifically comply with his pretrial order.