Case law

Neal v. United States

177 Ct. Cl. 937 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 16, 1966

Middleton v. United States, 110 Ct. Cl. 36 , 39-40 (1965). There the plaintiff had admitted in writing his passive participation in an uncompleted homosexual act. … The defendant places some reliance on Grant v. United States, 162 Ct. Cl. 600 (1963), but a reading of the case demonstrates its inapplicability.

Worth Engineering Co. v. United States

135 Ct. Cl. 843 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 12, 1956

Humphrey, et al. v. United States, 121 C. Cls., 390 ; American Construction Co. v. United States, 123 C. Cls., 408 , cert. denied 34S U. S. 922. … Howard Industries v. United States, 113 C. Cls. 231 . This regulation has also been held invalid as conflicting with the Lucas Act. Pittston-Luzerne Corp. v. United States, 84 F. Supp. 800 ; A. J. Spicer v.

Pitts v. United States

1 Cl. Ct. 148 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 27, 1983

E.g., Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389, 402 , 91 S.Ct. 1420, 1427 , 28 L.Ed.2d 842 (1971); Duvall v. United States, 227 Ct.Cl. 245, 250 , 647 F.2d 131, 134 (1981); Cooper v. … The functions of the Appeals Review Board are now vested in the Merit Systems Protection Board pursuant to section 202 of the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 ( 5 U.S.C. § 1205 (Supp. V 1981)).

Lucas v. United States

121 Ct. Cl. 819 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 4, 1952

(See Lucas v. Matthews, supra.) … Sidney Shapiro v. United States, 107 C. Cls. 650 ; William Richard Sima v. United States, 119 C. Cls. 405 ; William Anthony Fly v. United States, 120 C. Cls. 482 .

Trust Co. of Georgia v. United States

60 F. Supp. 470 · United States Court of Claims · May 7, 1945

. *164 The Board of Directors was authorized to redeem any particular shares of the Class A stock it desired without pro rata restrictions, and to resell it at such price as might be fixed by the Board of Directors. … Co. v. Board of Assessors, 74 N. J. Law, 5832. The transaction, therefore, does not come within the letter of subdivision (i) and, for the reasons stated above, we do not think it comes within its spirit.

Borchers

546 F.2d 430 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 10, 1976

Montilla v. United States, 198 Ct. Cl. 48 , 457 F.2d 978 (1972); Putnam Mills Corp. v. United States, 202 Ct. Cl. 1, 9 , 479 F.2d 1334, 1338 (1973); Scharaga v. United States, 209 Ct. Cl. 728 (1976); Haight v. … There is no comparable civilian correction board but the Federal Personnel Manual Supplement 990-2, Book 630, Subchapter S4, para.

Bates v. United States

453 F.2d 1382 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 21, 1972

See, e.g., Middleton v. United States, 175 Ct. Cl. 786 (1966) ; Motto v. United States, 175 Ct. Cl. 862 , 360 F. 2d 643 (1966) ; Clackum v. United States, 161 Ct. Cl. 34 (1963). … This does not mean that the same plaintiff is also barred from relief before a correction 'board. See Oleson v. United States, 172 Ct. Cl. 9 (1965); 10 U.S.C. § 1552 (b), swpra note 1.

Denton v. United States

144 Ct. Cl. 840 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 14, 1959

Swaim v. United States, supra, at pp. 561-562; Humphrey v. Smith, 336 U. S. 695, 696 (1949); Hiatt v. Brown, 339 U. S. 103, 110 (1950); Whelchel v. McDonald, 340 U. S. 122, 124, 126 (1950); Sanford v. … Hiatt v. Brown, 339 U. S. 103, 108-109 (1950); Whelchel v. McDonald, 340 U. S. 122, 126 (1950). I therefore recommend to the court that plaintiff’s petition in case No. 49800 be dismissed, and that with respect to Cong.

Robbins v. United States

21 F. Supp. 403 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 6, 1937

Stearns Co. v. … Bank of San Antonio, Ex’r, v.

Leavell-Morrison-Knudsen-Hardeman v. The United States

436 F.2d 451 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 22, 1971

United States v. Seckinger, 397 U.S. 203, 216 , 90 S.Ct. 880 , 25 L.Ed.2d 224 (1970). … The Corps of Engineers Board of Contract Appeals (“the Board”) denied the plaintiff’s appeal on the basis of the Board’s conclusion “that it would be clear to one bidding the job that the specification drafter thought the

Ocean Science & Engineering, Inc. v. United States

595 F.2d 572 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 18, 1979

Browne, submitted in accordance with Rule 134(h). … Gray v. Eskimo Pie Corp., 244 F.Supp. 785 (D. Del. 1965).

Browne v. United States

30 Ct. Cl. 124 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 25, 1895

By the fourth contract, as appears by finding v, the claimant agreed to deliver 1,000 tons of “Montana upland hay” between July 1, 1889, and June 30, 1890, at prices therein stated. … Paul Railway Company v. Hoyt ( 149 U.

West Coast University v. United States

162 Ct. Cl. 310 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 12, 1963

In Metropolitan Training Center, Inc. v. … (See Cambridge School of Radio Broadcasting, Inc. v. Administrator, Docket No. 91, June 17, 1953; Hal Styles School of Radio v. Administrator, Docket No. 238, October 30,1953.)

Thompson v. United States

139 F. Supp. 935 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 3, 1956

About three weeks later an Army Disposition Board recommended that he be sent before a retiring board. … «I* »t» V g: * * * (2) Basic provision — Irrespective of length of service, an Army patient will be presumed to have been in sound condition, upon entering active service, unless the disease or injury, or the conditions which

Blaine v. United States

5 Cl. Ct. 502 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 16, 1984

In Willcox v. … On this point, however, the court agrees with the Board.

Fireman's Fund Insurance Company v. The United States

421 F.2d 706 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 20, 1970

Co. v. United States, 169 F.Supp. 955 , 144 Ct.Cl. 655 (1959), and Home Indem. Co. v. … Co. v. United States, supra, was based.

Craddock v. United States

29 Cont. Cas. Fed. 82,568 · United States Court of Claims · May 21, 1982

United States v. Carlo Bianchi & Co., 373 U.S. 709, 714 (1963); Koppers Co., Inc. v. United States, 186 Ct. Cl. 142, 147 , 405 F.2d 554, 557 (1968). … The Board’s determination on a question of law, however, is not binding on this court. Arundel Corp. v. United States, 207 Ct. Cl. 84, 94 , 515 F.2d 1116, 1123 (1975) (citing Foster Constr. C.A. v.

J. R. Youngdale Construction Co. v. United States

504 F.2d 1124 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 23, 1974

. § 1491 , as amended by Public Law 92-415 ( 86 Stat. 652 ), the plaintiff’s aggregate claim is remanded to the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals for the holding of such hearing or hearings as may be deemed advisable … Maney Aircraft Parts, Inc. v. United States, 197 Ct. Cl. 159, 168 , 453 F. 2d 1260, 1262 (1972) ; Monroe M. Tapper & Associates v. United States, 198 Ct. Cl. 72, 76 , 458 F. 2d 66, 68 (1972).

Arroyo v. United States

229 Ct. Cl. 647 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 8, 1981

This case is before the court on petitioner’s appeal from a final decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board. … Patterson v. United States, 193 Ct. Cl. 750 , 436 F. 2d 438 (1971). Petitioner’s retirement may be found to be involuntary if it was induced by Government action causing duress. Clark v.

Russell v. United States

183 Ct. Cl. 802 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 19, 1968

Vitarelli v. Seaton, 359 U.S. 535, 546-547 (1959) (Frankfurter, J., separate opinion); Service v. Dulles, 354 U.S. 363 (1957); Sofranoff v. United States, supra, 165 Ct. Cl. 476 ; Barnes v. United States, 163 Ct. … See, also, United States v. L. A. Tucker Truck Lines, 344 U.S. 33, 36-38 (1952) ; North American Airlines v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 240 F. 2d 867, 874 (C.A.D.C., 1956), cert. denied, 353 U.S. 941 (1957) ; Adams v.