Case law

Austin v. United States

206 Ct. Cl. 719 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 16, 1975

United States v. King, 395 U.S. 1, 5 (1969); Jankovic v. United States, 204 Ct. Cl. 807 (1974). … See also to the same effect, Murray v. United States, 154 Ct. Cl. 185, 191 (1961); Sofranoff v. United States, 165 Ct. Cl. 470, 479 (1964); O'Callahan v. United States, 196 Ct.

T. C. Bateson Construction Co. v. United States

149 Ct. Cl. 514 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 6, 1960

That Board adopted the findings and conclusions of the Engineers’ Board and denied the plaintiff’s appeal. … Albrecht Co. v. United States, 146 Ct. Cl. 299, 305 .

Jefferson Construction Company v. The United States

348 F.2d 968 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 16, 1965

American Sanitary Rag Co. v. United States, supra, and cases there cited. … Construction Co. v. United States, 157 Ct.Cl. 409, 415 (1962).

Secor ex rel. Secor v. United States

54 Ct. Cl. 92 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 31, 1919

, the amount claimed at the hands of this board. … Cls., 148 ; Armstrong et al. v. United States, 29 C. Cls., 148 . Petitions are required under the rules of this court and for manifest reasons. The form of the attempted reference is for consideration.

Vulcanite Portland Cement Co. v. United States

74 Ct. Cl. 692 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 6, 1931

Preis & Co. v. United States, 58 C. Cls. 81, 86 ; Cohen, Endel & Co. v. United States, 60 C. Cls. 513, 518 ; and Yale & Towne Mfg. Co. v. United States, 67 C. Cls. 618, 625 . … Alaska Packers’ Ass’n v. Domenico et al., 117 Fed. 99, 102 .

Steinberg v. United States

163 F. Supp. 590 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 16, 1958

Dodge v. Board of Education, 302 U.S. 74 , 58 S.Ct. 98 , 82 L.Ed. 57 ; MacLeod v. Fernandez, 1 Cir., 101 F.2d 20 , certiorari denied Toste v. MacLeod, 308 U.S. 561 , 60 S.Ct. 72 , 84 L.Ed. 471 . … Updegraff and Slochower v. Board of Education, supra.

Malnak

27 Cont. Cas. Fed. 80,385 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 25, 1980

After a series of reviews these disputes resulted in the filing of two separate appeals with the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (ASBCA or board) in 1972. … Thirdly, regarding their constitutional claims, the employees have failed to make the requisite showing under Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 (1972) and Perry v.

Gibraltar Manufacturing Co. v. United States

546 F.2d 386 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 15, 1976

In Mason & Hanger-Silas Mason Co. v. United States, 207 Ct. … Paul v. United States, 371 U.S. 245, 250-253 (1963).

Cors v. United States

75 F. Supp. 235 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 5, 1948

S. 299 ; Vogelstein v. United States, 262 U. S. 337 ; United States v. New River Collieries, 262 U. S. 341 ; Olson v. United States, 292 U. S. 246, 255 ; United States v. Miller, 317 U. S. 369, 374 . … In support of this statement it relies particularly on United States v. Miller, supra, and on Rule 4 laid down by the President’s Advisory Board on Just Compensation, consisting of Judges Learned Hand, John J.

Colman v. United States

292 F.2d 283 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 19, 1961

The Correction Board’s recommendations were approved June 7,1956 by the Assistant Secretary of the Air Force. … In Roberts v. United States, 151 Ct.

Bliss v. United States

27 Ct. Cl. 388 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 27, 1892

Brown; in March, 1871, Ellen C. Brown conveyed her title to Andrews and Yenley by quitclaim; April, 1871, the suit of Wassel v.

Patten v. United States

161 Ct. Cl. 131 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 6, 1963

With respect to the Veterans Administration’s rating, see Holliday v. United States, 128 Ct. Cl. 647 . It is for the Army to determine who is unfit for military duty. … before such board. 23.

Taylor v. United States

591 F.2d 688 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 24, 1979

(See McGucken v. … V.

Trust Co. of Georgia v. United States

60 F. Supp. 470 · United States Court of Claims · May 7, 1945

. *164 The Board of Directors was authorized to redeem any particular shares of the Class A stock it desired without pro rata restrictions, and to resell it at such price as might be fixed by the Board of Directors. … Co. v. Board of Assessors, 74 N. J. Law, 5832. The transaction, therefore, does not come within the letter of subdivision (i) and, for the reasons stated above, we do not think it comes within its spirit.

D'Arco v. United States

441 F.2d 1173 · United States Court of Claims · May 4, 1971

Plaintiff argues that, under the rule of Marbury v. … The Board of Eeview on August 30, 1965 approved only so much of the sentence as included a fine of $1800. The Court of Military Appeals on April 29, 1966 affirmed the Board of Review’s decision (16 U.S.O.M.A. 213). 7.

Central Nat. Bank of Cleveland v. United States

41 F. Supp. 239 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 6, 1941

Both the Board of Tax Appeals, 23 B.T.A. 1103 , and the Circuit Court of Appeals, 3 Cir., 62 F.2d 1057 , held the transfer nontaxable. … Brown et al., Executors, v. United States, 37 F.Supp. 444 , 93 Ct.Cl. 217 . 5. The plaintiff is entitled to a credit of the Ohio inheritance taxes, computed in accordance with this opinion.

Binsfeld v. United States

118 Ct. Cl. 164 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 5, 1950

The Board found that plaintiff was responsible for the loss and recommended that the claim for reimbursement be denied. This report of the Board was approved by the convening 1 authority on June 16,1947. … Wright v. United States, 77 U. S. 731 .

Robinson v. United States

42 Ct. Cl. 52 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 7, 1907

(Endlich on the Interpretation of the Statutes, secs. 4, 58; United States v. Palmer, 3 Wheat., 610, 631 , and Smythe v. Fiske, 23 Wall., 374, 380 .) … Supp., 871 -872; Somers v. State, 58 N. W. R., 804, 806.)

Robbins v. United States

21 F. Supp. 403 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 6, 1937

Stearns Co. v. … Bank of San Antonio, Ex’r, v.

Collins v. United States

14 Cl. Ct. 746 · United States Court of Claims · May 19, 1988

Collins’ non-selection for promotion by the 1974 and 1975 boards.” … In Huntzinger v.