Case law

West Virginia v. United States

37 Ct. Cl. 201 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 17, 1902

R., 141 ; Vance v. United States, 30 C. Cls. R., 252 ; Le More v. United States, 35 C. Cls. R., 9 .) … (Ind., No. 9941, Sanchez v. United States.)

Everett Plywood Corp. v. United States

512 F.2d 1082 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 19, 1975

In Nager Electric Co. v. United States, 177 Ct. … dismissed plaintiff’s appeal; March-April 1970 — Board granted plaintiff's motion for reconsideration; October 1970 — Plearing held before the Board; February 2, 1971 — Board vacated prior dismissal but dismissed appeal

Globe Construction Co. v. United States

29 Cont. Cas. Fed. 82,530 · United States Court of Claims · May 7, 1982

Equally well established is the rule that the Board’s determination on a question of law is not binding on this court. Arundel Corp. v. United States, 207 Ct. … Citing WPC Enterprises, Inc. v. United States, 163 Ct.

Gregory Lumber Co. v. United States

29 Cont. Cas. Fed. 82,637 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 23, 1982

of Land Appeals (board), Wunderlich Act rules of limited review should apply. … Webco Lumber, Inc. v. United States, ante at 457, 677 F.2d 860 (1982), and Caffall Bros. Forest Products, Inc. v.

Bovard v. United States

160 Ct. Cl. 619 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 6, 1963

Plaintiff’s removal was upheld by the Appeals Examining Office of the Civil Service Commission, reversed by the Board of Appeals and Review, and an order entered restoring plaintiff to duty. … Arant v. Lane, 249 U.S. 367 ; Nicholas v. United States, 257 U.S. 71 ; Henry v. United States, 139 Ct. Cl. 362 ; Miner v. United States, 143 Ct. Cl. *621 801 ; Bailey v. United States, 144 Ct. Cl. 720 .

Grad Partnership v. United States

30 Cont. Cas. Fed. 70,545 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 22, 1982

Citing United States v. … Under the ruling in the Court of Claims in Skelly & Loy v.

Kenny v. United States

145 F. Supp. 898 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 6, 1956

The chief law officer of this Commission affirmed the removal action, and, after an appeal to the Board of Appeals and Review, this Board affirmed the decision of the chief law officer. … See e. g., Eberlein v. United States, 257 U. S. 82 ; Keim v. United States, 177 U. S. 290 ; Croghan v. United States, 116 C. Cls. 577 ; Love v. United States, 119 C. Cls. 486 ; Wittner v. United States, 110 C.

National Eastern Corp. v. United States

477 F.2d 1347 · United States Court of Claims · May 11, 1973

Bolander Co. v. United States, 186 Ct. Cl. 398, 404, 405, 415 (1968). See Paecon, Inc. v. United States, 185 Ct. Cl. 24, 35 , 399 F. 2d 162, 168-69 (1968) ; also, 3. W. Bateson Co. v. United States, 196 Ct. … Corp. v. United States, 167 Ct. Cl. 604 , 338 F. 2d 94 (1964); Brooklyn & Queens Screen Mfg. Co. v. United States, 97 Ct. Cl. 532 (1942); Suburban Contracting Co. v. United States, 76 Ct. Cl. 533 (1932); Pigeon v.

Jones Brothers Bakery, Inc. v. The United States

411 F.2d 1282 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 20, 1969

Chappell constituted the plaintiff’s board of directors. … Jones on August 8, 1953, the plaintiff’s board of directors has consisted of Paul C. Jones as chairman of the board and his sisters, Miss Ora E. Jones and Mrs. Gladys J. Chappell, as members of the board.

Williams v. United States

77 F. Supp. 207 · United States Court of Claims · May 3, 1948

The War Production Board made an award of compensation based on the prevailing price of scrap, and the Metals Reserve Company, acting for the Board, offered to pay the amount of such award to plaintiffs. … Schaffer v. United States, 104 C. Cls. 229 . We have no doubt that the property requisitioned included some items which should not have been classified as scrap, •and that the value was therefore beyond scrap prices.

Olin Mathieson Chemical Corp. v. United States

179 Ct. Cl. 368 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 17, 1967

Against this background we turn to the facts as they appear in the record before the Board. 1 See e.g., Morrison-Knudsen Co. v. United States, 170 Ct. … Co. v. McGrew, 188 U.S. 291, 312 (1903); Arkansas v . Kansas & Texas Coal Co., 183 U.S. 185, 190 (1901); Mountain View Mining & Milling Co. v. McFadden, 180 U.S. 533, 534 (1901).

Brandt v. United States

155 Ct. Cl. 345 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 4, 1961

Cl. 890 ; Leonard v. United States, 131 Ct. Cl. 91 ; Williams v. United States, 145 Ct. Cl. 513 , 172 F. Supp. 439 , and Clark v. United States, 151 Ct. Cl. 601 . In the cases, Fredrickson v. … United States, supra; Leonard v. United States, supra; and Clark v. United States, supra, the precise problem now before us was not presented.

Glendale Joint Venture v. United States

34 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,375 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 22, 1987

In Multi-Roof Systems Co., Inc. v. … See generally, Triax Co. v. United States, 11 Cl.Ct. 130 (1986); Multi-Roof supra, at 248 ; Space Age Engineering, Inc. v. United States, 2 Cl.Ct. 164, 165 (1983); E.D.S. Federal Corp. v.

Engels v. United States

2 Cl. Ct. 166 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 28, 1983

See Engels v. United States, 230 Ct.Cl.-, 678 F.2d 173, 175-76 (1982). Its analysis of the issues was markedly different from that of the board and that of the trial judge. … See Hodge v. Seiler, 558 F.2d 284, 287 (5th Cir.1977); Dowdell v. City of Apopka, 521 F.Supp. 297, 306 (M.D.Fla.1981); Morrison v. Alleluia Cushion Co., 73 F.R.D. 70, 71-72 (N.D.Miss.1976); Lee National Corp. v.

Tountasakis v. United States

29 Cont. Cas. Fed. 82,326 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 12, 1982

We uphold the decision of the Board. The terms of a contract must be read consistently, giving full effect to all of them. General Dynamics Corp. v. United States, 229 Ct. … Eriez Magnetics Corp. v. United States, 209 Ct. Cl. 673, 679 (1976) (Cong, ref.); Alabama Shirt & Trouser Co. v. United States, 121 Ct. Cl. 313, 331 (1952).

A. J. Paretta Contracting Co. v. United States

109 Ct. Cl. 324 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 6, 1947

Manifestly, this case differs from that of Albert & Harrison, In c. v. United States, 107 C. Cls. 292 [certiorari denied, 331 U. S. 810 ]. … Employees Group of Motor Freight Carriers v. National War Labor Board, 143 F. (2d) 145.

Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. United States

52 F.2d 1040 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 20, 1931

This question was before the United States Board of Tax Appeals in Gulf, Mobile & Northern Railroad Co. et al., 22 B. T. … We agree with the reasoning of the board and the conclusion reached in the above-mentioned case. The plaintiff relies upon the case of Edwards v. Cuba Railroad Co., 268 U. S. 628 , 45 S. Ct. 614 , 69 L.

Beaty v. United States

58 Ct. Cl. 25 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 2, 1923

(See findings of the board, set out in Finding I.) … United States v. Corson, 114 U. S. 619 ; Mimmack v. United States, 97 U. S. 426 . It follows that the Secretary of the Navy could not by a departmental letter do what the President himself could not.

The Brezina Construction Company, Inc. v. The United States

449 F.2d 372 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 15, 1971

See, e. g., Morrison-Knudsen Co. v. United States, 427 F.2d 1181, 1185 , 192 Ct.Cl. 410, 418 (1970); WPC Enterprises, Inc. v. United States, 323 F.2d 874, 876-877 , 163 Ct.Cl. 1, 6 (1963). … Co. v. United States, 314 F.2d 501 , 504, 161 Ct.Cl. 1, 7 (1963). See J. A. Jones Constr. Co. v. United States, 395 F.2d 783, 789-790 , 184 Ct.Cl. 1, 12-13 (1968).

Armand v. United States

136 Ct. Cl. 339 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 12, 1956

Compare Simon v. United States, 113 C. Cls. 182, 199 . … For the background of this Act see the discussion in Simon v. United States, 113 C. Cls. 182, 198 . Recovery in this court under that Act has been granted. Green v. United States, 124 C. Cls. 186 ; O’Brien v.