Case law

Rifkin v. United States

209 Ct. Cl. 566 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 14, 1976

In Clark v. United States, 162 Ct. … The board made a complete review and report.

McCormick v. United States

153 Ct. Cl. 64 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 7, 1961

As we held in the case of O'Hare v. … See O'Hare v. United States, supra, this day decided.

Arlington Trust Co. v. United States

109 F. Supp. 722 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 3, 1953

The defendant, however, justifies its late presentation by pointing to our decision in Erie Basin Metal Products, Inc. v. United States, No. 50271, 123 C. Cls. 433 . … On November 29,1946 the Settlement Review Board of the Commission wrote the contractor enclosing findings.

Heins v. United States

149 F. Supp. 331 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 6, 1957

As was stated by this court in Steen v. United States, 136 C. Cls. 142 , “Without the Secretary’s approval of a finding that the plaintiff is incapacitated, he is not entitled to retired pay.” … In addition thereto, as this court held in the cases of Wales v. United States, 132 C. Cls. 765 ; Holliday v. United States, 128 C. Cls. 647 ; Beamish v. United States, 130 C.

Spicer v. United States

83 F. Supp. 345 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 4, 1949

Board. … In Howard Industries, Inc. v.

Hubbell v. United States

15 Ct. Cl. 546 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 15, 1879

(Comegys v. Vasse, 1. Pet., 193.) … And in United States v.

Strick Lease, Inc. v. United States

29 Cont. Cas. Fed. 81,931 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 2, 1981

We must consider a decision of the Postal Service Board of Contract Appeals, reported as Cotco Leasing Co. v. United States Postal Service, 81-1 BCA ¶ 14,821 (1980). There were no material issues of fact. … The board decision is not appended hereto because it has been published.

Massachusetts ex rel. Department of Public Welfare v. United States

15 Cl. Ct. 73 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 13, 1988

On February 26, 1982, HHS’s Grant Appeals Board, in Board Decision No. 260, sustained HCFA’s disallowance of the Commonwealth’s claim. … Massachusetts appealed HCFA’s second disallowance to the Board, but on December 15, 1982, the Board issued a summary decision, based on the reasoning of Board Decision No. 260, upholding HCFA’s disal-lowance.

Thorne v. United States

5 Ct. Cl. 242 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 15, 1869

Smith v. Schrce-der, (U. S. C. C., Rhode Island, 21 Law Rep., 739 .) Dyer v. Cady, ( 20 Conn., 563 .) Cambridge Savings Bank v. Littlefield, (6 Cash., 210.) … Lawrence v. Brown, (1 Seld., 394;) Dezell v. Odell, ( 3 Hill, 215 ;) Wuscott v. Davis, (4 Bar., 493;) Dewey v. Field, ( 4 Met., 383 ; 6 Peck, 455 .)

William T. Colman v. United States

292 F.2d 283 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 4, 1961

The Correction Board’s recommendations were approved June 7, 1956 by the Assistant Secretary of the Air Force. … In Roberts v.

Anthony M. Meyerstein, Inc. v. United States

137 F. Supp. 427 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 31, 1956

In support of the latter contention plaintiff cites the cases of Montrose Contracting Co., Inc., v. County of West chester, 80 F. 2d 841 ; United States v. Spearin, 248 U. S. 132 ; City of New York v. … Union Paving Company v. The United States, 126 C. Cls. 478, 489 ; The Callahan Construction Co., 47 C. Cls. 177 .

Gregory Lumber Co. v. United States

9 Cl. Ct. 503 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 31, 1986

Department of Interior Board of Land Appeals (IBLA) as well as to the Interior Board of Contract Appeals (IBCA). … In such case, judicial review is strictly limited to the record established before the administrative board. See, e.g., United States v.

Eversharp, Inc. v. United States

125 F. Supp. 244 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 2, 1954

The case is then comparable to Carriso, Inc. v. United States, 106 F. 2d 707 , C. C. … See also Ross Packing Co. v. United States, 42 F. Supp. 932 .

Poirier & McLane Corp. v. United States

120 F. Supp. 209 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 6, 1954

Walsh Brothers v. United States, 69 F.Supp. 125 , 107 Ct.Cl. 627, 642 . … See Walsh v. United States, 102 F.Supp. 589 , 121 Ct.Cl. 546 .

Shafer v. United States

1 Cl. Ct. 437 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 1, 1983

Twenty days before his release from active duty, plaintiff petitioned the Board for the Correction of Naval Records (Board) to remove his Officer Fitness Reports from his file for the periods August 7, 1970, through October … The Board denied his petition on July 9, 1975, stating that insufficient evidence of material error or injustice had been presented.

Gifford v. United States

23 Cl. Ct. 8 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 18, 1991

In Hanratty v. … These include Alberico v. United States, 783 F.2d 1024 (Fed.Cir.1986), and Sims v.

Tri-Central, Inc. v. United States

29 Cont. Cas. Fed. 82,341 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 23, 1982

Lehman, Inc. v. United States, ante at 11, 673 F.2d 352 (1982). … White Plains Iron Works, Inc. v. United States, 229 Ct.

Christian v. United States

151 Ct. Cl. 609 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 1, 1960

However, he appeared before the Appeal Board in October 1953 and the Board, on the basis of his Navy medical record and other evidence gave him a 30-percent physical disability rating, no part of which was for pernicious … That action is a class suit entitled Frank Alois Brandenstein, et al. v. United States, No. 98-59.

Randolph Engineering Company v. The United States

367 F.2d 425 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 15, 1966

See WPC Enterprises, Inc. v. *428 United States, 323 F.2d 874 , 163 Ct.Cl. 1 (1963). … (Board Exhibit 9.)

Crowe v. United States

4 Cl. Ct. 734 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 26, 1984

The most recent decision and one closest on its facts is Brown v. Commissioner, supra. … In reviewing that decision with respect to the magis *739 trates, in Brown v.