Case law

York Industries, Inc. v. United States

30 Cont. Cas. Fed. 70,242 · United States Court of Claims · Aug 20, 1982

Almost a year later, the plaintiff appealed to the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals ("Board”), seeking adjustments in the contract price. … Skelly & Loy v. United States, ante at 370; Troup Bros. v. United States, ante at 707; W.H. Moseley Co. v. United States, 230 Ct.Cl. 405 , 677 F.2d 850 , cert. denied, 459 U.S. 836 (1982); Paul E. Lehman, Inc. v.

Holmes v. United States

3 Cl. Ct. 521 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 7, 1983

(MSPB) pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7701 and from the adverse decision of the Board to the Court of Appeals, *523 Holmes v. … Plaintiff cites Chambers v. United States, 196 Ct.Cl. 186 , 451 F.2d 1045 (1971) and Daub v.

Wyckoff v. United States

34 Ct. Cl. 288 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 20, 1899

(United States v. Symonds, 120 U. S. B., 46; United States v. Bishop, id., 51; United States v. Strong, 125 U. S. B., 656; United States v. Barnette, 165 U. S. B., 174, affirming this court, 21 C. Cls. … His quarters were on board, and he was in the uniform of a commander when on duty.

Clay Bernard Systems International, Ltd. v. United States

37 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,067 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 9, 1991

Board decisions on questions of law, and its interpretations of contract provisions, are entitled to careful consideration and are accorded great respect. George Hyman Constr. Co. v. … Decisions of law made by the board will be credited when they are reasonable and are based on the board’s expertise. Dale Ingram, Inc. v. United States, 475 F.2d 1177, 1185 , 201 Ct.Cl. 56 (1973); H.N.

Brigham v. United States

470 F.2d 571 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 12, 1972

In April, 1965, the United States Supreme Court decided the case of Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Brown, 380 U.S. 563 (1965), which approved a transaction similar in nature to that involved in the instant case. … In light of the Brown opinion, the Commissioner of Internal Bevenue published Bev.

McGiven v. United States

183 Ct. Cl. 920 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 19, 1968

(a) The medical board recommended plaintiff’s appearance before a physical evaluation board. Such an appearance was made on July 29, 1959. … ECG normal; Master’s two step test positive showing S-T depression in lead V-4 in the immediate ECG strip. Impression: 1.

Ludzinski v. United States

154 Ct. Cl. 215 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 7, 1961

Capps v. United States, 133 Ct. Cl. 811 . … In Brown v. United States, 143 Ct.

Refre v. United States

11 Cl. Ct. 81 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 22, 1986

Plaintiff then applied for relief to the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (Board). … In Burns v.

Natus Corporation v. The United States

371 F.2d 450 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 20, 1967

Both present questions of law which we may freely reexamine' — the Board’s decision on these matters being neither final upon plaintiff nor binding upon this court. Jack Stone Co. v. … Corp. v. United States, 351 F.2d 972 , 169 Ct.Cl. 384 (1965). We sustain the Board’s decision.

Space Age Engineering, Inc. v. United States

30 Cont. Cas. Fed. 70,978 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 25, 1983

justice, the United States Claims Court may order the consolidation of such suits in that court or transfer any suits to or among the agency boards involved.” . … Warwick Construction, Inc. v.

Scott v. United States

107 F. Supp. 846 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 7, 1952

The Retiring Board must have had a copy of this order. … The plaintiff relies upon the decision of the court in Whelpley v. United States, 119 C. Cls. 56 , but that case is clearly distinguishable on the facts.

Osage Nation of Indians v. United States

97 F. Supp. 381 · United States Court of Claims · May 1, 1951

Labor Relations Board v. … Pollock-Stockton Shipbuilding Co. v. Brown, 7 Cir., 185 F.2d 37 .

Bayly v. United States

99 Ct. Cl. 598 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 7, 1943

This statement is in accord with the decisions of the Supreme Court as to the scope of judicial review of decisions of administrative and quasi judicial boards and commissions. Washington Coach Co. v. … Labor Board, 301 U. S. 142 , and cases there cited; Labor Board v. Nevada Coffer Co., 316 U. S. 105 . Under those decisions, the reviewing court does not make a new and independent determination of the facts.

Illinois Tri-Seal Products, Inc. v. United States

353 F.2d 216 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 12, 1965

Co. v. … Brown and Edward Marcus. Illinois Tri-Seal was dissolved on December 18,1959. 2.

Cooper v. United States

639 F.2d 727 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 17, 1980

E.g., Morgan v. United States, 304 U.S. 1 (1937); Reilly, v. Pinkus, 338 U.S. 269 (1949). … Formerly the Appeals and Review Board of the Civil Service Commission.

Winchester Manufacturing Co. v. United States

72 Ct. Cl. 106 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 1, 1930

In the case of Poole Engineering Co. v. United States, 57 C. … See Bray, Trustee, v. United States, 46 C. Cls. 132, 139 ; Fitzgibbon v. United States, 52 C. Cls. 164, 169 , and cases cited; and Lustbader Construction Co. v. United States, 62 C. Cls. 549, 563 .

Yancey Co.

650 F.2d 285 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 8, 1980

The contractor, the Board concluded, "should have made inquiry” concerning the matter, id. … Space Corp. v. United States, 200 Ct. Cl. 1, 5 , 470 F. 2d 536, 538 (1972).

Montalvo v. United States

17 Cl. Ct. 744 · United States Court of Claims · Aug 22, 1989

In Brown v. … In sum, in Clark v.

Putnam Tool Co. v. United States

147 F. Supp. 746 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 16, 1957

By a notice dated February 27, 1946', the War Contracts Price Adjustment Board notified the plaintiff that it had adopted the determination made by its subordinate board that the plaintiff had realized excessive profits in … In our decisions in Eversharp, Inc. v. United States, 129 C. Cls. 772 , and 135 C. Cls. 717 , we held that the renegotiation regulation fixing the 6 percent rate of interest was invalid.

Cosmo Construction Co. v. United States

451 F.2d 602 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 12, 1971

By reason of the rule in United States v. … Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474, 488 (1951) ; and Consolidated Edison Co. v. NLRB, 305 U.S. 197, 229 (1938). Cl. Hollerbach v. United States, 233 U.S. 165 (1914). See also, A.