Case law

Cubacub v. Department of the Navy

230 Ct. Cl. 908 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 16, 1982

This is an appeal from a decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board (mspb) holding petitioner is not entitled to retirement benefits under the Civil Service Retirement System (csrs), 5 U.S.C. §8331 (1976) et seq. … Guevara v. United States, 229 Ct. Cl 595 (1981). Petitioner argues that his appointment must qualify him for csrs benefits because he worked for the Navy for 21 years.

Mountain Home Contractors v. United States

425 F.2d 1260 · United States Court of Claims · May 15, 1970

Co. v. United States, 171 Ct. … The interpretation of the meaning of a contract is a question of law to be determined by the court, and the court is not bound by a decision of the Board with respect thereto. Bailey Specialized Bldgs., Inc. v.

Holland v. United States

83 Ct. Cl. 376 · United States Court of Claims · May 4, 1936

In Terry v. United States, No. 28148, decided March 30, 1908 ( 81 C. … Rogers v. United States, 59 C. Cls. 464 .

Potts-Turnbull Advertising Co. v. United States

37 F.2d 970 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 13, 1930

The Board of Tax Appeals found this fact to have been proven. The record herein corroborates the findings of the board in this respect. … The answer to the contention is found in the ease of Snitzler-Warner Co. v. Commissioner, decided by the Board of Tax Appeals May 2,1929,16 B. T. A. 342.

Libby, McNeill & Libby v. United States

9 F. Supp. 673 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 4, 1935

Counsel for defendant rely largely on Burnet v. Porter, 283 U. S. 230 , 51 S. Ct. 416 , 75 L. … The situation is very different .from cases such as York Safe & Lock Co. v. United States, 40 F.(2d) 148 , 69 Ct. Cl. 529 ; Standard Oil Co. v. United States, 5 F.Supp. 976 , 78 Ct.

Gunn-Williams v. United States

32 Cont. Cas. Fed. 73,703 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 17, 1985

See Tecom, Inc. v. United States, 732 F.2d 935 (1984); T.J.D. Services, Inc. v. United States, 6 Cl.Ct. 257 (1984); Thoen v. United States, 5 Cl.Ct. 823 (1984); Milmark Services, Inc. v. … United States, 231 Ct.Cl. 954 (1982); Troup Bros. v. United States, 231 Ct.Cl. 707 (1982); White Plains Iron Works, Inc. v. United States, 229 Ct.Cl. 626 (1981); Paragon Energy Corp. v.

Goode v. United States

25 Ct. Cl. 261 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 31, 1890

It is contended that this case is governed by the law deter *267 mined in the case of Collier v. The United States (22 C. Cls. … The United States ( 21 How., 463 ); The United States v. Brindle ( 110 U. S. R., 688 ), and The United States v. Saunders (120 id., 126).”

Gila River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community v. The United States

427 F.2d 1194 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 20, 1970

In Sweatt v. … In Brown v.

Friedman

214 Ct. Cl. 804 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 21, 1977

Barger v. United States, 170 Ct. Cl. 207, 214 (1965).’ Carlson v. United States, ante, at 774. … Barger v. United States, supra.

Young Associates, Inc. v. United States

471 F.2d 618 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 18, 1973

Bateson Co. v. United States, 196 Ct. … (Plaintiff did not present this issue to the board.)

Upshaw v. United States

17 Cl. Ct. 732 · United States Court of Claims · Aug 17, 1989

In April 1985, the Correction Board issued its final decision. … They could be so interpreted only if the Board’s correction of plaintiff’s records entitled him to further promotions as a matter of law. Voge v.

Associated Traders, Inc. v. United States

169 F. Supp. 502 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 14, 1959

Seven members of the board concurred in the opinion; three concurred in the result; and four dissented. … Philippine Sugar Estates Development Co. v. Government of Philippine Islands, 247 U.S. 385 , 38 S.Ct. 513 , 62 L.Ed. 1177 ; James Stewart & Co., Inc. v. United States, 94 Ct.Cl. 95 .

Field v. United States

16 Ct. Cl. 434 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 15, 1880

The cases of Wheeler v. The United States ( 5 C. Cls. R., 504 ),. Wanless v. The United States (6 ib.,123), and Francis v. … (Gordon v. Dalby, 30 Iowa, 223.) The statute provision is a stringent one. It was enacted in time of war when stringent measures were deemed of pressing necessity.

Central Eureka Mining Co. v. United States

122 Ct. Cl. 691 · United States Court of Claims · May 6, 1952

pursuant to Limitation Order L-208, issued by that Board, which order, plaintiff insists upon the facts alleged, was arbitrary and violative of plaintiff’s property rights with respect to its gold mining properties. … The facts alleged in this amended petition and the issues raised by-the pleadings, aré identical in all material respects with the facts and issues involved in the case of Idaho Maryland Mining Corporation v.

Homestake Mining Co. v. United States

122 Ct. Cl. 690 · United States Court of Claims · May 6, 1952

pursuant to Limitation Order L-268, issued by the Board, which order, plaintiff insists upon the facts alleged, was arbitrary and violative of plaintiff’s property rights with respect to its gold mining properties. … The facts alleged in the petition herein and the issues raised by the pleadings, are identical in all material respects with the facts and issues involved in the case of Idaho Maryland Mining Corporation v.

Wm. A. Smith Contracting Co. v. United States

155 Ct. Cl. 44 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 19, 1961

In Martin Wunderlich et al. v. … United States v. Wunderlich et al., 342 U.S. 98 (1951).

Pittman Construction Co. v. United States

30 Cont. Cas. Fed. 70,991 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 31, 1983

reports of the Board of Contract Appeals Decisions). … Coath & Goss, Inc. v. United States, 101 Ct.Cl. 702 , 715 (1944); Commerce International Co. v. United States, 167 Ct.Cl. 529, 543 , 338 F.2d 81, 90 (1964). C. The Errors and Omissions Claim.

Bowman v. United States

7 Cl. Ct. 302 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 24, 1985

A requirement to remain on board can be established in several different ways. First, there could be a written order to remain on board. See e.g., Detling v. … If it can be shown that plaintiffs were induced to stay on board the vessel that would be sufficient to demonstrate a “requirement” that they stay on board. See Anderson v.

Aris Gloves, Inc. v. The United States

420 F.2d 1386 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 23, 1970

Young v. United States, 97 U.S. 39 , 24 L.Ed. 992 (1877); Lamar v. Browne, 92 U.S. 187 , 23 L.Ed. 650 (1875); Juragua Iron Co. v. United States, 212 U.S. 297 , 29 S.Ct. 385 , 53 L.Ed. 520 (1909). … See Lamar v. Browne, supra.

Vaughn v. United States

158 F. Supp. 716 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 15, 1958

The board recommended that plaintiff be restored retroactively to the position from which he was removed October 8, 1954. … Eberlein v. United States, 257 U.S. 82 , 42 S.Ct. 12 , 66 L.Ed. 140 ; Keim v. United States, 177 U.S. 290 , 20 S.Ct. 574 , 44 L.Ed. 774 ; Jordan v. United States, Ct.Cl., 158 F. Supp. 715 .