Case law

Baum v. United States

64 Ct. Cl. 323 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 5, 1927

Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co. v. United States, 261 U. S. 592, 596 . … Three years after the board’s decision the petition was filed in this case.

Curran v. United States

65 Ct. Cl. 26 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 20, 1928

Plaintiff submitted a claim for reimbursement for his lost goods, and same was considered by a *29 duly authorized board of Army officers, which board made the following report: “That in July, 1919, Major Curran received … See United States v. Kaufman, 96 U. S. 567 .

Deuterium Corp. v. United States

19 Cl. Ct. 624 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 23, 1990

Brown, modified HX103 to take over the preheating function. Plaintiff suggests that Dr. Brown acted under supervision from PG & E and DOE. … Brown correctly presents these facts, the release of EIC also released DOE from liability for any alleged use of the '506 patent by HX103. Vintén Ltd. v. United States, 213 CtCl. 759, 566 F.2d 1188 (1977) (Order).

Taussig v. United States

38 Ct. Cl. 104 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 5, 1903

In the case of Strong v. The United States ( 23 C. Cls. … In the case of Aulick v. The United States ( 27 C. Cls.

Alta Electric & Mechanical Co. v. United States

90 Ct. Cl. 466 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 5, 1940

In Moffett, Hodgkins & Co. v. Rochester, 178 U. … We do not think such course was the command of the statute or the board’s duty.

Realty Bond & Mortgage Co. v. United States

16 F. Supp. 771 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 9, 1936

This ruling was approved by the Board in the subsequent case of Industrial Loan & Investment Co. v. Com’r, 17 B.T.A. 1328 , where a similar state of facts was presented. … This holding was likewise approved and followed by the Board in the case of Inland Finance Company v. Commissioner, 23 B.T.A. 199 , upon facts practically identical with those in the instant case.

Robert L. Guyler Co.

553 F.2d 104 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 5, 1977

“Although the Board’s decision on the legal question is not binding on the court under 41 U.S.C. § 322 , the court has, after reviewing the Board’s decision and the motions and briefs of the parties, concluded that the specifications … Corp. v. United States, 169 Ct. Cl. 384 , 351 F. 2d 972 (1965) and Abe L. Greenberg Co. v. United States, 156 Ct.

Homcy v. United States

536 F.2d 360 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 16, 1976

Kirby v. United States, 201 Ct. Cl. 527, 531 (1973), cert. denied, 417 U.S. 919 (1974); O'Callahan v. United States, 196 Ct. Cl. 556, 562 , 451 F. 2d 1390, 1393 (1971); Mathis v. United States, 183 Ct. … Friedman v. United States, 159 Ct. Cl. 1, 11-12 , 310 F. 2d 381, 387-88 (1962), cert. denied, Sub nom Lipp v. United States, 373 U.S. 932 (1963).

Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. United States

558 F.2d 577 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 15, 1977

Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. United States, 160 Ct. … On those facts, the Board’s holding was clearly correct. R.E.D.M. Corp. v. United States, 192 Ct. Cl. 891, 902-03 , 428 F.2d 1304, 1310 (1970).

Chase & Rice, Inc. v. The United States

354 F.2d 318 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 17, 1965

, or not supported by substantial evidence, citing the Wunderlich Act, supra, and United States v. … Union Pacific Railroad Co. v. United States, 10 Ct.Cl. 548 (1874), affirmed United States v. Union Pacific Railroad Co., 11 Ct.Cl. 1 , 91 U.S. 72 , 23 L.Ed. 224 (1875).

Gantz ex rel. Boyd v. District of Columbia

18 Ct. Cl. 569 · United States Court of Claims · May 14, 1883

The Board of Public Works, in 1871, 1872, and 1874, by entries in their records, had established what were called “ Board rates ” for work such as that done by the claimant, and those were the prices first stated in the voucher … (Noonan v.

Sun Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. United States

76 Ct. Cl. 154 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 14, 1932

Shippey et al. v. … Penn Bridge Co. v. United States, 59 C.Cls. 892, and Eaton, Brown & Simpson v. United States, 62 C.Cls. 668, 685.

Lucas v. United States

37 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,269 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 14, 1992

Mendenhall v. United States, 20 Cl.Ct. 78, 85 (1990); Begay v. United States, 16 Cl.Ct. 107, 134 (1987); Northern Helex Co. v. … Solar Turbines, Inc. v.

Bethlehem Corp. v. United States

462 F.2d 1400 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 14, 1972

The Board’s analysis seems clearly correct. In this connection, two relevant decisions of this court require comparison with the present case although neither is cited by the Board. Those decisions are Austin Co. v. … United States v. Spearin, 248 U.S. 132 (1918); Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. United States, 160 Ct. Cl. 437 , 312 F. 2d 774 (1963); R. M. Hollingshead Corp. v. United States, 124 Ct. Cl. 681 , 111 F.

Francis M. Marley v. The United States

381 F.2d 738 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 20, 1967

Co. v. … In Motto v.

Paschen Contractors, Inc. And Peter Kiewit Sons' Co., Joint Venturers v. The United States

418 F.2d 1360 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 12, 1969

Corp. v. United States, 369 F.2d 992 , 177 Ct. Cl. 1025 (1966). 6 . … C. v. United States, 376 F.2d 299 , 179 Ct.Cl. 651 (1967). 11 . Abe L. Greenberg Co. v. United States, 300 F.2d 443, 446 , 156 Ct.Cl. 434, 440 (1962). 12 . Gholson, Byars & Holmes Constr. Co. v.

Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. The United States

444 F.2d 1097 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 14, 1971

We dealt with a similar issue a decade ago in Slick Airways, Inc. v. United States, 292 F.2d 515 , 154 Ct.Cl. 417 (1961). … We read it as a statement directed to the situation the Board had before it at the time. As we held in Slick and as recognized in United States v.

Germano v. United States

26 Cl. Ct. 1446 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 23, 1992

[a board’s] recommendations ... where the evidence is susceptible of varying interpretations.” Sanders, 219 Ct.Cl. at 299 , 594 F.2d at 812 (citing Boyd, 207 Ct.Cl. at 11). In Boyd v. … Id.; see also Weiss v. United States, 187 Ct.Cl. 1, 5 , 408 F.2d 416, 418 (1969). In reviewing the Secretary’s decision or a correction board’s determination, the court applies a two-part test.

719 Fifth Avenue Co. v. United States

5 F. Supp. 909 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 5, 1934

The plaintiff appealed to the Board of Tax Appeals, and the Board held that plaintiff was entitled to 3 per cent, per annum as a deduction for depreciation on the cost of the building, but was not entitled to any amount by … Subsequently, in another ease (Bonwit Teller & Co. v. Com’r, 17 B. T. A. 1019, 1926), the Board applied this rule, but the decision was reversed in the Circuit Court of Appeals. Bonwit Teller & Co. v.

Pollard v. United States

155 F. Supp. 954 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 6, 1957

(See Scott v. United States, 123 C. CIls. 547, 551.) … Whelpley v. United States, supra; Terry v. United States, 120 C. Cls. 315 ; Ferrer v. United States, 132 C. Cls. 422 ; Scott v. United States, supra; Waters v. United States, 135 C. Cls. 274 .