Case law

Aamodt v. United States

22 Cl. Ct. 716 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 5, 1991

See also Amos v. United States, 22 Cl.Ct. 724 (Cl.Ct.1991); Beall v. United States, 22 Cl.Ct. 59 (1990); Ackerman v. United States, 21 Cl.Ct. 484 (1990); Adams v. United States, 20 Cl.Ct. 542 (1990). . … See also United States v.

South Dakota Wheat Growers Ass'n v. United States

90 Ct. Cl. 222 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 8, 1940

The findings in this case show that in the latter part of January 1930, the manager of plaintiff conferred with the -chairman of the Federal Farm Board with reference to turning over the wheat which it held to the Farm Board … In the case of North Pacific Grain Growers, Inc., v.

Hartle v. United States

22 Cl. Ct. 843 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 26, 1991

In Rash v. … In Palumbo v.

Chollar v. United States

126 F. Supp. 448 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 30, 1954

Brown v. United States, 122 C. Cls. 361 ; Jordan v. United States, 123 C. Cls. 577 . Nor is plaintiff entitled to recover on a contract. … We held in Jordan v. United States, 123 C. Cls. 577 , that a similar agreement of employment did not afford ground for a suit on a contract. The Supreme Court so held as far back as Crenshaw v. United States, 134 U.

O'Hare v. District of Columbia

18 Ct. Cl. 646 · United States Court of Claims · May 28, 1883

or by the Board of Audit. … (Neuchatel Paving Company v. the District of Columbia, 17 C. Cls. R., 386 .)

Dickenson v. United States

163 Ct. Cl. 512 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 13, 1963

Dickenson v. Davis, 245 F. 2d 317, 319 (10th Cir., 1957), cert. denied 355 U.S. 918 . … Bell v. United States, 366 U.S. 393, 401-402 (1961). This entitle *520 ment continues even though he is placed in arrest or confinement for trial on court-martial charges. Walsh v. United States, 43 Ct.

Polite v. United States

24 Cl. Ct. 508 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 2, 1991

The Board denied Polite’s application in May 1983. … Hart v. United States, 910 F.2d 815, 818 (Fed.Cir.1990) (panel decision); Sankey v. United States, 22 Cl.Ct. 743, 746-47 (1991); contra Acker v.

Leonard v. United States

145 F. Supp. 758 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 7, 1956

Plaintiff cites as authority this court’s decision in Tanner v. United States, 129 C. Cls. 792 . … McBlair v. United States, 19 C. Cls. 528 . He was granted retirement pay in accordance with the act of April 3, 1939, supra, as of the date of his discharge.

Shapiro v. United States

69 F. Supp. 205 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 6, 1947

United States v. Brown, 206 U.S. 240 , 27 S.Ct. 620 , 51 L.Ed. 1046 . … See also Smith v. O’Grady, 312 U.S. 329 , 61 S.Ct. 572 , 85 L.Ed. 859 ; McCleary v. Hudspeth, 10 Cir., 124 F.2d 445 ; Levine v. Hudspeth, 10 Cir., 127 F.2d 982 .

Ashgar v. United States

23 Cl. Ct. 226 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 20, 1991

See United States v. King, 395 U.S. 1, 4 , 89 S.Ct. 1501, 1502 , 23 L.Ed.2d 52 (1969); United States v. Sherwood, 312 U.S. 584, 590 , 61 S.Ct. 767, 771 , 85 L.Ed. 1058 (1941); Kabua v. … United States v. John C. Grimberg Co., 702 F.2d 1362, 1375 (Fed.Cir. 1983); Costner v. United States, 229 Ct.Cl. 87 , 89 n. 5, 665 F.2d 1016 , 1017 n. 5 (1981). Heagy v.

John Wanamaker Philadelphia, Inc. v. The United States. John Wanamaker Philadelphia, Inc. (Successor by Merger to John Wanamaker New York, Inc.) v. The United States

359 F.2d 437 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 15, 1966

Hackensack Water Co. v. United States, supra; Wright Contracting Co. v. Commissioner, supra; Broida, Stone & Thomas, Inc. v. United States, supra; Commissioner v. O. … Then plaintiff focuses on the fiscal years 1916-1920 which were before the Board of Tax Appeals in John Wanamaker Philadelphia, Inc. v.

Max M. Stoeckert, Doing Business as University Brick & Tile Co. v. The United States

391 F.2d 639 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 15, 1968

H & H Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. United States, 168 Ct.Cl. 873, 879 (1964). *646 Cf. Wingate Construction Company v. … In United States v.

Mark Smith Construction Co. v. United States

34 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,523 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 9, 1988

Motion(s) for dismissal, without prejudice, as to claims later filed in this court as Counts I — III and V, were filed with the Board. … On June 18, 1984, without explanation, plaintiffs motions were granted by the Board, and the Board appeals relative to Counts I — III and V {i.e., docket Nos. 1471, 1512, 1517, and 1454, respectively) were dismissed without

Ferguson v. United States

166 Ct. Cl. 310 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 12, 1964

Friedman v. United States, 159 Ct. Cl. 1 , 310 F. 2d 381 , cert. denied 373 U.S. 932 . … In 1952 plaintiff asked United States Senator Arthur V.

Corwine v. United States

24 Ct. Cl. 104 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 21, 1889

Ifc is insisted by the counselfor the claimant that the cases of Symonds v. The United States, Bishop v. The United States, and Strong v. The United States ( 21 C. Cls. R., 148 ; 215 U. S. R., 46 -51; 23 C. … The term “ active service,” as used in the Supreme Court, was noticed by this court in the subsequent case of Strong v. The United States ( 23 C. Cls.

Love v. United States

98 F. Supp. 770 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 3, 1951

Croghan v. United States, 89 F.Supp. 1002 , 116 Ct.Cl. 577 ; Wittner v. United States, 76 F.Supp. 110 , 110 Ct.Cl. 231 . … Eberlein v. United States, 257 U.S. 82 , 42 S.Ct. 12 , 66 L.Ed. 140 ; Keim v. United States, 177 U.S. 290 , 20 S.Ct. 574 , 44 L.Ed. 774 .

McAulay v. United States

305 F.2d 836 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 18, 1962

Furlong v. United States, 138 Ct. Cl. 843 . Although plaintiff’s petition might have been dismissed on this ground, defendant did not urge this point, and we will proceed to dispose of this case on the merits. … Part 725) provided for the appointment by designated authorities of medical boards and physical evaluation boards.

Evans Reamer & MacHine Company v. The United States

386 F.2d 873 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 11, 1968

Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. United States, 312 F.2d 774 , 160 Ct.Cl. 437 (1963); Potashnick v. United States, 105 F.Supp. 837 , 123 Ct.Cl. 197 (1952); and Ragonese v. … See Bolinders Company, Inc. v.

Alberico v. United States

7 Cl. Ct. 165 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 28, 1984

United States v. Brown, 381 U.S. 437, 448-49 , 85 S.Ct. 1707, 1714-15 , 14 L.Ed.2d 484 (1965) (quoting United States v. Lovett, 328 U.S. 303, 315-16 , 66 S.Ct. 1073, 1078-79 , 90 L.Ed. 1252 (1946)). … In Goldberg v.

Frecht v. United States

25 Cl. Ct. 121 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 21, 1992

In Sargisson v. … Failure to timely raise objections and issues to a board of inquiry constitutes a waiver of that right in subsequent litigation. Snakenberg v. United States, 15 Cl.Ct. 809, 813 (1988). In Martinez v.