Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscc

6,266 results

1.14s

  • Hayes Freight Lines, Inc. v. United States

    163 Ct. Cl. 265 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 15, 1963

    In United States v. … expressed by the Board.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Giesler v. United States

    230 Ct. Cl. 723 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 23, 1982

    Ramsey v. United States, 215 Ct. Cl. 1042 (1978), cert. denied 439 U.S. 1068 (1979); Mathis v. United States, 183 Ct. Cl. 145 , 147, 391 F.2d 938, 939 (1968). … Permissive administrative remedies, such as a resort to the Correction Board, do not give rise to a new cause of action, even where the Correction Board bases its decision on a new rationale. Merriott v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Bishop v. United States

    26 Cl. Ct. 281 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 6, 1992

    , the Officer Special Review Board, or the Department of the Army Active Duty Board. … Triax Co. v. United States, 20 Cl.Ct. 507, 509 (1990) (citing Eyre v. McDonough Power Equip., 755 F.2d 416 , 420 (5th Cir.1985) (construing FRCP 59)); see Yuba Natural Resources, Inc. v.

    Cited 96 timesPublished
  • Fred H. Sorrough v. United States

    295 F.2d 919 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 1, 1961

    Johnson, 316 U.S. 481, 484 , 62 S.Ct. 1168 , 86 L.Ed. 1611 (1942); Siegel v. United States, Ct.Cl. … Carlin v. United States, 100 F.Supp. 451 , 121 Ct.Cl. 643, 660 (1951); Uhley v. United States, 147 F.Supp. 497 , 137 Ct.Cl. 275, 281 (1957); Towell v. United States, Ct.Cl.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • H.L.C. & Associates Construction Company, Inc. v. The United States

    367 F.2d 586 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 10, 1966

    In support of its challenge of the board’s conclusion, plaintiff relies upon additional facts, drawn from the record underlying the board’s decision. … [Citing] : Moyer Bros. v. United States, 156 Ct.Cl. 120 (1962) ; Oliver-Finnie Co. v. United States, 150 Ct.Cl. 189, 201 , 279 F.2d 498, 506 (1960); Anderson v. United States, 143 Ct.Cl. 729 (1958); Carman v.

    Cited 49 timesPublished
  • Everett Plywood and Door Corporation v. The United States

    419 F.2d 425 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 12, 1969

    Co. v. United States, 168 Ct.Cl. 692, 699 (1964), cited with approval in Paccon, Inc. v. … In Brawley v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • E. Walters & Co. v. United States

    576 F.2d 362 · United States Court of Claims · May 17, 1978

    The board even suggests that use of the options clause may have been "unlawful,” but finds it unnecessary to decide that question. See, G.L. Christian & Associates v. United States, 160 Ct. … Ling-Temco-Vought, Inc. v. United States, 201 Ct. Cl. 135 , 475 F.2d 630 (1973). See, for example, DeVito v. United States, 188 Ct. Cl. 979 , 413 F.2d 1147 (1969), and its progeny. *266 See also Northern Helex Co. v.

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Gem Hammock & Fly Net Co. v. United States

    60 Ct. Cl. 262 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 26, 1925

    contract adjustment board. … United States v. Clyde, 13 Wall. 35 . This case, however, reflects an entirely different situation. The plaintiff and defendant were engaged in no serious disputation'.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Schaller v. United States

    288 F.2d 700 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 7, 1961

    Flanagan v. … Crocker v. United States, 130 Ct. Cl. 567 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Watson v. United States

    12 Cl. Ct. 502 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 19, 1987

    See Maier v. … These findings by the Board provide substantial support for affirming the Board’s decision, especially in light of the strong presumption that correction boards faithfully discharge their duties. See Cooper v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Doyle Shirt Manufacturing Corp. v. United States

    462 F.2d 1150 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 14, 1972

    We do not believe that the Foster case is controlling here because of the following findings by the Board which are supported by substantial evidence. Rice v. United States, 192 Ct. … It says that the case falls within the guideline of DeVito v. United States, 188 Ct.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Standard Computing Scale Co. v. United States

    52 F.2d 1018 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 20, 1931

    The Board held likewise in Marshall Brothers Lumber Co., 13 B. T. … Brant Co. v. United States, supra, certiorari denied, 282 U. S. 888 , 51 S. Ct. 100 , 75 L.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Petrini v. United States

    19 Cl. Ct. 41 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 13, 1989

    Russell Corp. v. United States, 210 CtCl. 596, 609, 537 F.2d 474, 481-82 (1976), cert denied, 429 U.S. 1073 , 97 S.Ct. 811 , 50 L.Ed.2d 791 (1977); Pacific Gas & Elec. Co. v. … In American General Leasing, Inc. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Cunningham v. United States

    161 Ct. Cl. 82 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 6, 1963

    She was advised that she had a right to appeal to the Board of Appeals and Review within seven days. The seven days expired on June 20. At that time the grievance committee of the agency was still considering her case. … Under these facts, we think we must overrule the defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, on the authority of Morelli v. United States, this day decided, p. 44. AFM 40-1, E2.2, 1, c(l) (g)-.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Diamond v. United States

    176 Ct. Cl. 1103 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 15, 1966

    Morris v. United States, 171 Ct. … See Caddington v. United States, 147 Ct. Cl. 629 , 178 F. Supp. 604 (1959) and Bianco v. United States, 171 Ct. Cl. 719 (1965).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Harris v. United States

    8 Cl. Ct. 299 · United States Court of Claims · May 31, 1985

    See, e.g., Boyd v. … See Fucik v. United States, 228 Ct.Cl. 379, 387 , 655 F.2d 1089, 1095 (1981) (remanding to administrative board an issue that plaintiff had failed to submit to the board); Gratehouse v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Kien v. United States

    227 Ct. Cl. 772 · United States Court of Claims · May 29, 1981

    Sanders v. United States, 219 Ct. Cl. 285, 298 , 594 F.2d 804, 811 (1979). … Orloff v. Willoughby, 345 U.S. 83 (1953); Brenner v. United States, 202 Ct. Cl. 678 (1973), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 831 (1974).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Helen K. Browne, Administratrix of the Estate of Joseph C. Browne, Deceased v. The United States. David C. Browne and Diana K. Browne v. The United States. Robert E. Kanode and Audrey Lee Kanode v. The United States

    356 F.2d 546 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 18, 1966

    BROWNE, Administratrix of the Estate of Joseph C. Browne, Deceased v. The UNITED STATES. David C. BROWNE and Diana K. Browne v. The UNITED STATES. Robert E. KANODE and Audrey Lee Kanode v. The UNITED STATES. No. 70-61. … Browne, David C. Browne, and Robert E.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wiener v. United States

    142 F. Supp. 910 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 12, 1956

    In Myers v. United States, 272 U. … However, in Humphrey's Executor v. United States, 295 U.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Alloy Products Corporation v. The United States

    302 F.2d 528 · United States Court of Claims · May 9, 1962

    In the case of Du Puy v. … Looney v. District of Columbia, 18 Ct.Cl. 8 ; The Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co. v. United States, 34 Ct.Cl. 484 ; Yale & Towne Manufacturing Co. v.

    Cited 22 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.