Case law

Mackey v. United States

142 F. Supp. 922 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 5, 1956

Golding v. United States, 131 C. Cls. 677, 680 ; see also Holliday v. United States, 128 C. Cls. 647 . … retiring board. 7.

Leefer

578 F.2d 1388 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 9, 1978

"Plaintiff appealed his reduction-in-grade administratively to the Appeals Examining Office (AEO) and the Board of Appeals and Review (now the Appeals Review Board — ARB), both of which rendered decisions adverse to *1062 … There is a strong presumption that officials act in good faith, Grover v. United States, 200 Ct.Cl. 337, 344 (1973), and plaintiff has not overcome this presumption.

Elston Co. Ex Rel. United States Brewing Co. v. United States

21 F. Supp. 267 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 14, 1938

In Clarke v. … The defendant suggests that the Board cases just referred to were decided prior to the decisions of the Supreme Court in Clarke v. Haberle Crystal Springs Co., supra, and Renziehausen v. Lucas, supra.

Lima Surgical Associates, Inc. Voluntary Employees' Beneficiary Ass'n Plan Trust v. United States

20 Cl. Ct. 674 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 15, 1990

Harding Hospital, Inc. v. United States, 505 F.2d 1068, 1071 (6th Cir.1974) (citation omitted); accord Founding Church of Scientology v. … As stated in Latrobe Steel Co. v.

Istivan v. United States

689 F.2d 1034 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 22, 1982

Sanders v. United States, 219 Ct. Cl. 285, 298 , 594 F.2d 804, 811 (1979); Cooper v. United States, 203 Ct. Cl. 300, 304 (1973). … We have previously held, in the military retirement area, that the usual deference given to a board’s decision is predicated upon a discussion, in writing, of the reasons for a board’s actions. Craft v.

Pepper v. United States

8 Cl. Ct. 666 · United States Court of Claims · Aug 26, 1985

Costello v. United States, 365 U.S. 265 , 81 S.Ct. 534 , 5 L.Ed.2d 551 (1961); Brundage, 504 F.2d at 1382 ; Erickson v. United States, 1 Cl.Ct. 163, 165-66 (1983); Cason, 471 F.2d at 1229 . … Deering v. United States, 223 Ct.Cl. 342, 351 n. 3, 620 F.2d 242 , 246 n. 3 (en banc 1980); Plant v. United States, 650 F.2d 285 , 222 Ct.Cl. 682 (1980); Frommhagen v.

E. Walters & Co. v. United States

576 F.2d 362 · United States Court of Claims · May 17, 1978

The board even suggests that use of the options clause may have been "unlawful,” but finds it unnecessary to decide that question. See, G.L. Christian & Associates v. United States, 160 Ct. … Ling-Temco-Vought, Inc. v. United States, 201 Ct. Cl. 135 , 475 F.2d 630 (1973). See, for example, DeVito v. United States, 188 Ct. Cl. 979 , 413 F.2d 1147 (1969), and its progeny. *266 See also Northern Helex Co. v.

Schwartz v. United States

181 F. Supp. 408 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 2, 1960

After plaintiff’s suspension on March 12, 1954, he was given a 'hearing before the Security Hearing Board on July 8, 1954. The Board rendered its adverse decision on August 31, 1954. … His time was undoubtedly taken up in the effort to secure favorable action, by the Board.

Doyle Shirt Manufacturing Corp. v. United States

462 F.2d 1150 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 14, 1972

We do not believe that the Foster case is controlling here because of the following findings by the Board which are supported by substantial evidence. Rice v. United States, 192 Ct. … It says that the case falls within the guideline of DeVito v. United States, 188 Ct.

ITT Gilfillan, Inc. v. United States

471 F.2d 1382 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 18, 1973

Likewise in the case of State of Oklahoma v. United States, 146 Ct. Cl. 185 , 173 F. … In Sundstrand Turbo v. United States, 182 Ct.

Gem Hammock & Fly Net Co. v. United States

60 Ct. Cl. 262 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 26, 1925

contract adjustment board. … United States v. Clyde, 13 Wall. 35 . This case, however, reflects an entirely different situation. The plaintiff and defendant were engaged in no serious disputation'.

Empire Ordnance Corp. v. United States

128 F. Supp. 744 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 8, 1955

After the Appeal Board had ruled in favor of Empire, the Board of Directors of Empire passed a resolution fixing McHale’s fee at $93,500, and Gutt’s fee at $10,000, which were apparently acceptable to McHale and Gutt. … This matter was fully discussed in Ralph Pittman v. United States, 127 C. Cls. 173 , 116 F. Supp. 576 ; cert. den., 348 U. S. 815 , and will not be repeated here.

Ness Investment Corp. v. United States

595 F.2d 585 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 21, 1979

Ness Investment Corp. v. United States Department of Agriculture, 512 F. 2d at 712 n. 7. Plaintiffs accepted the Board’s decision on this question as final. … Therefore, the decision of the Board of Forest Appeals is res judicata as to the issues involved, United States v. Utah Construction and Mining Co., 384 U. S. 394, 421-422 (1966); Safir v.

Kien v. United States

227 Ct. Cl. 772 · United States Court of Claims · May 29, 1981

Sanders v. United States, 219 Ct. Cl. 285, 298 , 594 F.2d 804, 811 (1979). … Orloff v. Willoughby, 345 U.S. 83 (1953); Brenner v. United States, 202 Ct. Cl. 678 (1973), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 831 (1974).

Tannehill v. United States

18 Cl. Ct. 296 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 3, 1989

Scharf v. Dep’t of the Air Force, 710 F.2d at 1575 ; see also Petrick v. … Doyle v.

Standard Computing Scale Co. v. United States

52 F.2d 1018 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 20, 1931

The Board held likewise in Marshall Brothers Lumber Co., 13 B. T. … Brant Co. v. United States, supra, certiorari denied, 282 U. S. 888 , 51 S. Ct. 100 , 75 L.

Schaller v. United States

288 F.2d 700 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 7, 1961

Flanagan v. … Crocker v. United States, 130 Ct. Cl. 567 .

Diamond v. United States

176 Ct. Cl. 1103 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 15, 1966

Morris v. United States, 171 Ct. … See Caddington v. United States, 147 Ct. Cl. 629 , 178 F. Supp. 604 (1959) and Bianco v. United States, 171 Ct. Cl. 719 (1965).

WPC Enterprises, Inc. v. United States

323 F.2d 874 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 11, 1963

Civil Aeronautics Board, 240 F. 2d 867, 874 (C.A.D.C., 1956), cert. denied, 353 U.S. 941 (1957); Adams v. Witmer, 271 F. 2d 29, 36-37 (C.A. 9, 1958). … See United States v.

Marshall Leasing, Inc. v. United States

13 Cl. Ct. 368 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 2, 1987

United States, 4 Cl.Ct. 662 (1984); Armstrong v. United States, 4 Cl.Ct. 269 (1984); and Brown v. United States, 175 Ct.Cl. 343 , 358 F.2d 1002 (1966). The Brown case, however, is distinguishable from the case at bar. … Ireland v. United States, 11 Cl.Ct. at 544 .