Case law

Raymond F. Pauley v. The United States

440 F.2d 426 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 16, 1971

But the provision is flexible and, as pointed out in Browning v. … See Browning v. United States, swpra. In Browning the plaintiff, also an employee of the Department of Agriculture, was separated for failure to accept reassignment.

Blount Brothers Construction Company v. The United States

346 F.2d 962 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 11, 1965

The other factual findings of the Board are accepted; the court is not substituting its own view of the facts. See Morrison-Knudsen Co. v. United States, Ct.Cl., 345 F.2d 833 , decided May 14, 1965. … Corp. v. United States, 162 F.Supp. 190 , 192, 142 Ct.Cl. 731, 734 (1958); Jefferson Constr. Co. v.

JJJ Corp. v. United States

576 F.2d 327 · United States Court of Claims · May 17, 1978

Defendant relies upon Alex Brown, Inc. v. … Alex Brown, Inc. v. Commissioner, supra, 60 T.C. at 368 .

Campbell v. District of Columbia

18 Ct. Cl. 193 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 26, 1883

(Clark v. United States, 95 U. S. R., 539 .) … R., 351 ), and Brown’s Case ( 17 C. Cls.

National Board of the Young Men's Christian Associations v. United States

396 F.2d 467 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 14, 1968

In United States v. … Justice Field in United States v.

Bullock v. United States

176 F. Supp. 279 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 13, 1959

Brown Company is a licensee under said patent. Plaintiff Bullock is president of E. C. Brown Company. … Brown Company, a corporation of New York, is licensee under said patent. Giles E. Bullock is president of The E. C. Brown Company and has a substantial financial interest in that company.

Wells v. United States

39 F.2d 998 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 7, 1930

In Schwab v. … In Rea v. Heiner (D.

Engels

221 Ct. Cl. 898 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 19, 1979

Browne, filed April 30, 1979, as the basis for judgment in this case. The trial judge recommends that plaintiffs case be remanded to the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (Correction Board). … Application to the Correction Board is not a mandatory remedy. See Mathis v. United States, 183 Ct.Cl. 145 , 391 F. 2d 938 (1968).

Ventress v. United States

9 Ct. Cl. 508 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 15, 1873

Romeyn v. United States

20 Ct. Cl. 373 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 1, 1885

Weldon, J., delivered the opinion of the court: It is alleged in the petition of the claimant that he was stationed at Fort Brown, in the State of Texas, in November, 1883. … During the extended leave of absence, petitioner was ordered before a retiring board convened at Fort Snelling, in the State of Minnesota.

Barnes v. District of Columbia

22 Ct. Cl. 366 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 31, 1887

Board, of Supervisors, etc., v. Bowen (4 Lansing, 24) was a case of compromise of a suit at law pending an appeal. In Bean v. … . *388 In Nelson v.

Manz Corp. v. United States

54 F.2d 177 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 7, 1931

Co. v. United States, 280 U. S. 453, 465-468 , 50 S. Ct. 215, 219 , 74 L. … See, also, Brown & Sons Lumber Co. v. Burnet, 282 U. S. 283 , 51 S. Ct. 140 , 75 L. Ed. 343 .

Walters v. United States

358 F.2d 957 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 15, 1966

Harper v. United States, supra; Stone v. United States, supra; Farrar v. United States, supra. … Brown and Mackie) testified to the contrary, but expressed certain reservations. Dr. Brown based his opinion on incomplete medical records in plaintiff’s case up to, but not after, April 4, 1946.

Black v. United States

24 Cl. Ct. 465 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 13, 1991

Sanders v. United States, 219 Ct.Cl. 285, 298-300 , 594 F.2d 804, 813 (1979); Long v. United States, 12 Cl.Ct. 174, 175 (1987). … Long, 12 Cl.Ct. at 175 ; Brown v. United States, 184 Ct.Cl. 501, 511-512 , 396 F.2d 989, 1000-1001 (1968).

Betty Friedman, of the Estate of Joseph Friedman, Deceased v. The United States

310 F.2d 381 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 11, 1963

Similarly, in Brown v. United States, 141 Ct.Cl. 557 , the serviceman was released in 1946 (after appearing before a Retiring Board) without disability retirement pay. … Cl. 466 , cert. denied, 355 U.S. 926 , 78 S.Ct. 383 , 2 L.Ed.2d 356 ; Proper v. United States, 139 Ct.Cl. 511 ; Friedman v. United States, 158 F.Supp. 364 , 141 Ct.Cl. 239 ; Brown v.

J. I. Case Co. v. United States

65 F. Supp. 464 · United States Court of Claims · May 6, 1946

Brown v. Helvering, 291 U. S. 193, 201 . See especially pages 201-202. See also the cases digested in C. C. H. (1946) pp. 2861-2869. … Brown v. Helvering, supra. The taxpayer now recognizes that it is not entitled to deduct the amount set up on its books, but only 10/12ths of the amount of the taxes actually levied for the calendar year 1937.

Burd v. United States

19 Cl. Ct. 515 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 15, 1990

Thus, the issue is one of law, Interstate Commerce Comm’n v. … See 5 U.S.C. § 706 (2)(A); Alexander v. Federal Energy Regulatory Comm’n, 609 F.2d 543, 546 (D.C.Cir.1979).

American Natural Gas Co. v. United States

13 F. Supp. 69 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 6, 1936

Loewer Realty Co. v. Anderson (C.C.A.) 31 F.(2d) 268, 269 ; Sunshine Cloak & Suit Co. v. Commissioner, 10 B.T. A. 971, 977. … Brown & Sons Lumber Co. v. Burnet, 282 U.S. 283 . 286, 51 S.Ct. 140 , 75 L.Ed. 343 ; Manz Corporation v. United States, 54 F.(2d) 177 , 74 Ct.Cl. 5 .

Levering & Garrigues Co. v. United States

71 Ct. Cl. 739 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 6, 1931

Cls. 549 ; Eaton, Brown & Simpson, Inc., v. United States, 62 C. … Crook Co., Inc., v. United States, 59 C. Cls. 348 ; McClintic-Marshall Co. v. United States, 59 C. Cls. 817; Goldstone v. United States, 61 C. Cls. 401 ; M. H. McCloskey, jr. (Inc.) v. United States, 66 C. Cls. 105 .

Van Karner Chemical Arms Corp. v. United States

72 F. Supp. 270 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 7, 1947

Before this sale could be consummated, however, the production of Browning machine guns had increased to such an extent that the Army was able to supply all the needs of the Navy with the Browning gun, and the proposed sale … Plaintiff does not contend that the ammunition was worth more than that allowed by the War Production Board, which was $621.00.