Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscc

6,266 results

2.86s

  • Roflan Co. v. United States

    32 Cont. Cas. Fed. 73,207 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 11, 1985

    Kaminer Construction Corporation v. United States, 203 Ct.Cl. 182, 191 , 488 F.2d 980, 984 (1973); BCM Corporation v. United States, 2 Cl.Ct. 602, 605 (1983). … Sundstrand Turbo v. United States, 182 Ct.Cl. at 60, 389 F.2d at 423 , citing to Jefferson Construction Co. of Florida v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Hoffman v. United States

    66 Ct. Cl. 452 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 3, 1928

    It is clear that he could only receive this appointment after an examination by the board, a favorable recommendation to the President, and action by the latter on the report. … See CronIN v. United States, 62 C. Cls. 20 , and Guilmette v. United States, 49 C. Cls. 188 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • American Electric Contracting Corp. v. United States

    579 F.2d 602 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 14, 1978

    Hormel v. Helvering, 312 U.S. 552, 556-59 (1941); Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563, n. 579 (1968); MacRae v. Commissioner, 294 F.2d 56, 59 (9th Cir. 1961), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 955 (1962); and see 3 K. … In Rough Diamond Co. v. United States, 173 Ct.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Gaines v. United States

    158 Ct. Cl. 497 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 18, 1962

    See also Post v. United States, 121 Ct. Cl. 94 ; Tabbutt v. United States, 121 Ct. Cl. 495 ; Gray v. United States, 136 Ct. Cl. 312 . … See, e.g., Farley v. United States, 131 Ct. Cl. 776 ; Anderson v. United States, 136 Ct. Cl. 365 ; Parks v. United States, 141 Ct. Cl. 415 .

    Cited 41 timesPublished
  • Allison

    546 F.2d 430 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 1, 1976

    Upon- consideration thereof, the court concludes that in view of the decisions of the Supreme Court in United States v. Testan, 424 U.S. 392 (1976), and Brown *333 v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Clement Brothers Company, Inc. v. The United States

    418 F.2d 1356 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 9, 1970

    The case was thus commenced here on July 16th. 1 *1358 Invoking Universal Ecsco Corps, v. … Terteling & Sons, Inc. v. United States, 390 F.2d 926, 927 , 182 Ct.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Diamond Manufacturing Co. v. United States

    31 Cont. Cas. Fed. 71,579 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 29, 1983

    Merritt v. United States, 267 U.S. 338 , 45 S.Ct. 278 , 69 L.Ed. 643 (1925); Algo-nac Manufacturing Co. v. United States, 192 Ct.Cl. 649 , 428 F.2d 1241 (1970). … Tuttle/White Constructors, Inc. v. United States, 656 F.2d 644 (1981); Santa Fe Engineers v. United States, 677 F.2d 876 (1982).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Miller v. United States

    19 Ct. Cl. 338 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 7, 1884

    (Mimmack v. The United States, 97 U. S., 426 .) … (Blake v. United States, 103 U. S., 237 .)

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Gallo v. United States

    8 Cl. Ct. 550 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 31, 1985

    Boyle v. United States, 207 Ct.Cl. 27, 34-35 , 515 F.2d 1397, 1401 (1975); Schlegel v. … Kyle v. I.C.C., 609 F.2d 540 , 542 (D.C.Cir.1980); Glenn v. Merit System Protection Board, 616 F.2d 270 , 271 (6th Cir.1980).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Degenaars Co. v. United States

    31 Cont. Cas. Fed. 71,186 · United States Court of Claims · May 18, 1983

    Cornell Wrecking Co. v. United States, 184 Ct.Cl. 289, 291 (1968). As noted by the Board, AGC rates include profit and depreciation factors, 75-1 B.C.A. … Hall Construction Co. v. United States, 177 Ct.Cl. 870, 886 , 379 F.2d 559 (1966). The cases cited by defendant to support the Board’s decision are distinguishable. Weaver v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Jeffrey v. United States

    127 Ct. Cl. 231 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 5, 1954

    Jackson v. United States, 121 C. Cls. 405 ; Egan v. United States, 123 C. Cls. 460 . … Garcia v. United States, 123 C. Cls. 722 ; Gregory v. United States, 123 C. Cls. 794 . We see no procedural defect in the history of the plaintiff’s case. See O'Brien v. United States, 124 C. Cls. 655 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Alpirn v. United States

    111 F. Supp. 280 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 7, 1953

    United States v. Commodities Trading Corp., 339 U. S. 121 . No proof was offered on this point and the rule is controlling here. … Interstate Circuit Inc. v. United States, 306 U. S. 208 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Capobianco v. United States

    394 F.2d 515 · United States Court of Claims · May 10, 1968

    Commissioner Bernhardt’s opinion, as modified by the court, is as follows: In Roberts v. United States, 174 Ct. Cl. 940 , 357 F. 2d 938 (1966), Johnson v. United States, 173 Ct. Cl. 561 (1965), and in Morgan v. … Carlo Bianchi & Co., supra, United States v. Anthony Grace & Sons, 384 U.S. 424 (1966), and United States v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Underwood v. United States

    62 Ct. Cl. 378 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 14, 1926

    On June 16, 1919, after the first contract was made the Shipping Board adopted the following resolution: “Resolved, That hereafter the United States Shipping Board will allow a commission of V/i per cent to brokers selling … the extent of the authority conferred by law upon the board, or upon any of its employees by the board.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • a. W. Duckett & Co., Inc. v. United States

    58 Ct. Cl. 403 · United States Court of Claims · May 28, 1923

    It does appear in Finding V, and we will treat it as if the reference to the finding were correctly stated. … For its third ground of objection the plaintiff alleges error in that it is stated in Finding V that “ a board of appraisers was appointed by the Secretary of War to determine proper compensation to be paid the terminal company

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Terrell v. United States

    7 Cl. Ct. 171 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 28, 1984

    Armstrong v. United States, 594 F.2d 804 , 205 Ct.Cl. 754, 761 (1974). See also Sanders v. United States, 219 Ct.Cl. 285, 298 (1979); Weide v. United States, 4 Cl.Ct. 432, 435 (1984). … Terrell v. United States, Cl.Ct. No. 408-83C, Administrative Record Part VI, at 006 (September 12, 1983). The board specifically noted that it had considered all of the evidence and information provided by Mr.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Chayra v. United States

    23 Cl. Ct. 172 · United States Court of Claims · May 17, 1991

    The Federal Circuit in Maier relied on Heisig v. … In military pay matters, the court reviews a plaintiff’s case “through the prism of a correction board.” Cohn v. United States, 15 Cl.Ct. 778, 789 (1988). The court’s review is limited.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Bromley Contracting Co. v. United States

    33 Cont. Cas. Fed. 74,559 · United States Court of Claims · Aug 20, 1986

    (1982); Santa Fe Engineers, Inc. v. … In Santa Fe Engineers, Inc. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Dove v. United States

    161 Ct. Cl. 768 · United States Court of Claims · May 10, 1963

    Conley v. Gibson, 855 U.S. 41 , 45-46 (1957). … Citing Hofflund v. United States, 154 Ct. Cl. 66 . . Citing Hofflund v. United States, supra, and Eclov v. United States, 137 Ct. Cl. 341 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Scott McCormac and May McCormac v. The United States

    424 F.2d 607 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 17, 1970

    Plaintiffs rely principally upon the landmark case of Burnet v. … See, e. g., Burnet v. Logan, supra; Robinette v. Helvering, 318 U.S. 184 , 63 *620 S.Ct. 540, 87 L.Ed. 700 (1943); Commissioner of Internal Revenue v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.