Case law

Swentek v. United States

658 F.2d 791 · United States Court of Claims · Aug 19, 1981

Webb v. United States, 227 Ct. Cl. 777 (1981). That board will be able to conduct an appropriate review of the FEAA decision. … The Merit Systems Protection Board was established in lieu of the Federal Employee Appeals Authority under the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978, Pub. L. No. 95-454, 92 Stat. 1111. See generally Brewer v.

Jordan v. United States

123 Ct. Cl. 577 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 2, 1952

Plaintiff in this case, as did plaintiff in Brown v. United States, 122 C. … Brown v. United States, supra; Ginn v. United States, 110 C. Cls. 637 , citing Eberlein v. United States, 257 U. S. 82, 84 , affirming, 53 C. Cls. 466 .

Tool Products Co. v. United States

589 F.2d 506 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 13, 1978

Since the trial of this case antedates the warnings we gave in Major Coat Co. v. United States, 211 Ct. … Corp. v. United States, 211 Ct. Cl. 110 , 544 F.2d 499 (1976).

Vicente v. United States

1 Cl. Ct. 299 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 8, 1982

See Gaskins v. Merit Systems Protec *301 tion Board, 221 Ct.Cl. 918 , Order of October 23, 1979. . … Ramos v. Merit Systems Protection Board, Civil Action No. 81-2524, D.D.C., June 15, 1982.

A. R. F. Products, Inc. v. The United States

388 F.2d 692 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 15, 1967

Chase & Rice, Inc. v. United States, 354 F.2d 318 , 173 Ct.Cl. 740 (1965); Blanchard v. United States, 347 F.2d 268 , 171 Ct.Cl. 559 (1965). … Rolin v. United States, 160 F.Supp. 264 , 142 Ct.Cl. 73 (1958). Hollingshead Corp. v. United States, 111 F.Supp. 285 , 124 Ct.Cl. 681 (1953), cited by plaintiff is inapposite.

Nolan v. United States

41 F.2d 962 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 2, 1930

Shipping Board for the SS. … In United States v. Palmer, 3 Wheat. 610, 631 , 4 L.

Appalachian Floor Co. v. United States

144 Ct. Cl. 11 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 5, 1958

Hurvey Radio Laboratories, Inc. v. U.S., 126 C. Cls. 383 ; Ultermehle v. Norment, 197 U.S. 40, 56 (1905); Hunt v. Rousmaniere’s Adm., 1 Pet. 1, 15 ; Bank of the United States v. Daniel, 12 Pet. 32, 55 ; U.S. v. … Hodson, 10 Wall. 379 , 409; Lamborn v. County Commissioners, 97 U.S. 181, 185 ; Snell v. Insurance Co., 98 U.S. 85, 90, 92 ; Allen v. Galloway, 30 Fed. Rep. 466. R. H. Stearns Co. v. U. S., 291 U.

Jones v. United States

3 Cl. Ct. 417 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 28, 1983

Albright v. United States, 161 Ct.Cl. 356, 362 (1963). To ensure that injustice does not result, this court must weigh all relevant factors before applying the laches doctrine. Shafer v. … Id. at 439 (citing McGahey v. United States, 213 Ct.Cl. 717 , 718, 553 F.2d 105 (1977)).

Norfolk Dredging Company v. The United States

360 F.2d 619 · United States Court of Claims · May 13, 1966

The Board held, on the authority of Peter Kiewit Sons’ Co. v. United States, 74 F.Supp. 165 , 109 Ct.Cl. 517 (1947), and Chernus v. … Arundel Corp. v. United States, 96 Ct.Cl. 77 (1942); Arundel Corp. v. United States, 103 Ct.Cl. 688 , cert denied 326 U.S. 752 , 66 S.Ct. 90 , 90 L.Ed. 451 (1945); Breymann v.

Lord v. United States

2 Cl. Ct. 749 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 20, 1983

V 1981). … V 1981). Gearinger v. United States, 188 Ct.Cl. 512, 518-19 , 412 F.2d 862, 866 (1969).

Spofford v. United States

32 Ct. Cl. 452 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 14, 1897

(United States v. Bank of Metropolis, 15 Peters, 377 .) … In tbe case of United States v. Langston ( 118 U.

Schwartz v. United States

181 F. Supp. 408 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 2, 1960

After plaintiff’s suspension on March 12, 1954, he was given a 'hearing before the Security Hearing Board on July 8, 1954. The Board rendered its adverse decision on August 31, 1954. … His time was undoubtedly taken up in the effort to secure favorable action, by the Board.

National Steel and Shipbuilding Company v. The United States

419 F.2d 863 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 12, 1969

Peter Kiewit Sons’ Co. v. United States, supra, n. 11; Thompson v. United States, 124 F.Supp. 645, 649-650 , 130 Ct.Cl. 1, 7-9 (1954); Ben C. Gerwick, Inc. v. United States, supra, n. 9; Chalender v. … McGraw & Co. v.

William Green Construction Co. v. United States

477 F.2d 930 · United States Court of Claims · May 11, 1973

Co. v. United States, 200 Ct. … The time-limit for appeals to contract appeals boards is not beyond enlargement (M aney Aircraft Parts, Inc. v. United States, 197 Ct. Cl. 159 , 453 F. 2d 1260 (1972); Monroe M. Tapper & Associates v.

CRF v. United States

624 F.2d 1054 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 18, 1980

Corp. v. United States, 205 Ct. Cl. 858, 861 (1974); Gresham & Co. v. United States, 200 Ct. Cl. 97 , 470 F.2d 542 (1972). … Edison Co. v. NLRB, 305 U.S. 197, 229 (1938).

Tannehill v. United States

18 Cl. Ct. 296 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 3, 1989

Scharf v. Dep’t of the Air Force, 710 F.2d at 1575 ; see also Petrick v. … Doyle v.

Smith v. United States

168 Ct. Cl. 545 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 11, 1964

Board. … Examination showed a 36 percent enlargement of his heart, a marked disparity in the size and function of his kidneys (the right kidney was 6 cm. in length v. 13 cm. for the left kidney), and an impairment in both.

Hubert M. Biggs v. United States

287 F.2d 908 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 1, 1961

This is a suit by wage board employees •of the Department of the Navy to recover overtime pay. … United States, 121 Ct.Cl. 94, 98-99 ; Sirmon v. Cron & Gracey Drilling Corp., D.C., 44 F.Supp. 29, 31 ; Dollar v. Caddo River Lbr. Co., D.C., 43 F.Supp. 822 . Plaintiffs are not entitled to recover.

Hutter v. United States

170 Ct. Cl. 517 · United States Court of Claims · May 14, 1965

These are the set boundaries within which this court will review such Board action. Thompson v. United States, 156 Ct. Cl. 158 (1962). … The Correction Board was under no duty to defer to the conclusion reached by the Veterans Administration if there was substantial evidence before the Board to the contrary. John M. Kearney v. United States, 140 Ct.

Murray v. United States

9 Cl. Ct. 71 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 31, 1985

Sanders v. United States, 219 Ct.Cl. 285 , 594 F.2d 804 (1979). “[T]he fact that this court has the jurisdiction to review actions of military correction boards is not disputable.” … The 1979 reserve Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board was specifically approved by this court in Palmer v. United States, 6 Cl.Ct. 541 (1984). .