Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
6,266 results
1.29s
Art Center School v. United States
142 F. Supp. 916 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 5, 1956
Hemphill Schools, Inc. v. … As was stated in Thomas v.
Cited 14 timesPublished3 Cl. Ct. 595 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 12, 1983
In Mazo v. … In Feist v.
Cited 7 timesPublished154 Ct. Cl. 34 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 7, 1961
Eberlein v. United States, 257 U.S. 82 ; Culligan v. United States, 107 Ct. Cl. 222 , cert. denied, 330 U.S. 848 ; Bryan v. United States, 128 Ct. Cl. 541 . … Atkinson v. United States, 144 Ct. Cl. 585 ; Misuraca v. United States, 135 Ct. Cl. 387 ; DeBusk v. United States, 132 Ct. Cl. 790 , cert. denied 350 U.S. 988 .
Cited 10 timesPublishedUnited States Steel Corp. v. United States
536 F.2d 921 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 16, 1976
Fissinger, V. C. Sutcliffe, and Mr. Harris for USS. … Contracts § 5 (1963) ; Carpenter v. Josey Oil Co., 26 F. 2d 442 (8th Cir. 1928). The Board so held in this case.
Cited 12 timesPublished649 F.2d 837 · United States Court of Claims · May 6, 1981
S. 102, 126 (1974); Hatzlachh Supply Co. v. United States, 444 U. S. 460, 463 (1980). See also Brown v. General Services Administration, 425 U. S. 820, 824-825, 834 (1976), and cases cited; Matson Navigation Co. v. … Brown v. General Services Administration, supra, is therefore distinguishable.
Questioned by Four Rivers Investments, Inc. v. United States, 77 Fed. Cl. 592 (2007)Cited 33 timesPublished123 Ct. Cl. 709 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 2, 1952
After receiving notice of the Commission’s decision, the plaintiff appealed to the Commission’s Board of Appeals and Review and requested a hearing before that Board. … Blum v. United *712 States, 120 C. Cls. 232 ; Love v. United States, 119 C. Cls. 486 ; Wittner v. United States, 110 C. Cls. 231 .
Cited 8 timesPublished14 Cl. Ct. 84 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 11, 1987
This court does not sit as a super correction board. See Skinner v. United States, 219 Ct.Cl. 322, 330-31 , 594 F.2d 824, 829-30 (1979); Reale v. … Bayside Enterprise, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, 429 U.S. 298, 304 , 97 S.Ct. 576, 581 , 50 L.Ed.2d 494 (1977); Grieg, 226 Ct.Cl. at 270, 640 F.2d at 1270; Sanders v.
Cited 13 timesPublishedWah Chang Corporation v. United States
282 F.2d 728 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 5, 1960
[Quoting from Jones v. … In Sunswick Corp. v.
Cited 24 timesPublished181 Ct. Cl. 1095 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 15, 1967
Watson v. United States, 152 Ct. Cl. 273 (1961). Plaintiff’s sincerity in the effort to be returned to active duty is unchallenged. … (The relevance of this comment rests upon the relation to this case of the court’s decision in Beckham v. United States, 179 Ct. Cl. 539 , 375 F. 2d 782 (1967). Finding 11(c). Finding 3(d). Finding 5.
Cited 6 timesPublishedStafford Ordnance Corp. v. United States
108 F. Supp. 378 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 2, 1952
Moriarty v. United States, 97 C. Cls. 338 ; Pink v. United States, 85 C. Cls. 121 ; Electric Boat Co. v. United States, 81 C. Cls. 361 . … Florida Dehydration Co. v. United States, 121 C. Cls. 89 .
Cited 6 timesPublished18 Cl. Ct. 362 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 25, 1989
In addition, general discretion is further evidenced by the fact that hearings are not required by statute, but instead are left to the complete discretion of the board of military records. Flute v. … However, it does not require that regulations established by the respective secretaries of boards for correction of military records be identical. Flute, 535 F.2d at 629 ; see Winters v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedChampion Rivet Co. v. United States
30 F. Supp. 234 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 4, 1939
opinion of the court: The contentions of plaintiff in this case are the same as the contentions advanced by it in support of its claimed right to recover the tax assessed and collected in Lehigh Portland *74 Cement Company v. … Compare Columbia Carbon Co. et al. v. United States, 77 Ct. Cls. 768.
Cited 2 timesPublishedCamel Manufacturing Co. v. United States
572 F.2d 280 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 22, 1978
V. 1975). … Ball Co. v.
Cited 17 timesPublished207 Ct. Cl. 478 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 3, 1975
Abruzzo v. United States, 206 Ct. Cl. 131 , 513 F. 2d 608 (1975); Yee v. United States, 206 Ct. Cl. 388 , 512 F. 2d 1383 (1975); Cooper v. United States, 203 Ct. Cl. 300 (1973); Clinton v. United States, 191 Ct. … The Board could have held that the loss of the promotion though not “error” in the legal sense, was “injustice”. We have held, as in Skaradowski v. United States, 200 Ct.
Cited 40 timesPublished170 Ct. Cl. 639 · United States Court of Claims · May 14, 1965
Davis et al. v. United States, 164 Ct. … Keim v. United States, 177 U.S. 290 (1900); Eberlein v. United States, 257 U.S. 82 (1921). Plaintiffs’ reliance on our recent decision in Colbath v. United States, 169 Ct. Cl. 414 , 341 F. 2d 626 (1965), is misplaced.
Cited 2 timesPublished69 F. Supp. 406 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 3, 1947
Cromwell v. County of Sac, 94 U. S. 351 ; Southern Paoific Railroad Co. v. United States, 168 U. S. 1 ; Tait v. Western Maryland Railway Co., 289 U. S. 620 . … McClure v. United States, 98 C. Cls. 381, 391 .
Cited 3 timesPublishedConsolidated Molded Products Corp. v. United States
600 F.2d 793 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 13, 1979
See, for example, Koppers Co. v. United States, 186 Ct. Cl. 142 , 405 F.2d 554 (1968) (issue of fact); Tecon Corp. v. United States, 188 Ct. Cl. 436 , 411 F.2d 1271 (1969) (issue of fact); Stock & Grove, Inc. v. … As this court stated in Broome Construction, Inc. v. United States, 203 Ct. Cl. 521 , 492 F.2d 829 (1974): In this the board was clearly correct.
Cited 5 timesPublished16 Cl. Ct. 637 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 13, 1989
When substantial evidence supports a board’s action, and when that action is reasonable in light of all the evidence presented, the court will not disturb the result. Holman v. … When reasonable minds could reach differing conclusions in the same instance, the court will not substitute its own judgment for that of the military board. Maier v.
Cited 21 timesPublished166 Ct. Cl. 527 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 12, 1964
Myers v. Bethlehem, Corporation, 303 U.S. 41 , 50-51 (1938); United States v. Blair, 321 U.S. 730, 735-737 (1944); United States v. Holpuch Co., 328 U.S. 234, 239-240 (1946). … United States v. Chemical Foundation, 272 U.S. 1, 14-15 (1926); Slavitt v. United States, 155 Ct. Cl. 606, 613 (1961), cert. denied, 370 U.S. 938 .
Cited 9 timesPublishedSt. Regis Paper Co. v. United States
76 F. Supp. 831 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 5, 1948
Van Sant et al., v. United States, 75 Ct.Cl. 562, 566 . In Royal Holland Lloyd v. … In Morrisdale Coal Co. v.
Cited 10 timesPublished
Ask Donna