Case law

A.B.G. Instrument & Engineering, Inc. v. United States

593 F.2d 394 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 21, 1979

’s favor, S&E Contractors, Inc. v. … Co. v. United States, 204 Ct. Cl. 726 , 499 F.2d 639 (1974). That condition has not been met here.

Gordon v. United States

649 F.2d 837 · United States Court of Claims · May 6, 1981

S. 102, 126 (1974); Hatzlachh Supply Co. v. United States, 444 U. S. 460, 463 (1980). See also Brown v. General Services Administration, 425 U. S. 820, 824-825, 834 (1976), and cases cited; Matson Navigation Co. v. … Brown v. General Services Administration, supra, is therefore distinguishable.

Elchibegoff v. United States

123 Ct. Cl. 709 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 2, 1952

After receiving notice of the Commission’s decision, the plaintiff appealed to the Commission’s Board of Appeals and Review and requested a hearing before that Board. … Blum v. United *712 States, 120 C. Cls. 232 ; Love v. United States, 119 C. Cls. 486 ; Wittner v. United States, 110 C. Cls. 231 .

Frame v. United States

124 Ct. Cl. 557 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 3, 1953

Plaintiff, after having appeared before a reconvened Army Retiring Board, appealed to the Secretary of the Army’s Disability Review Board which found that his disability was incident to service and existed at the time of … The case is governed by the principles laid down in Womer v. United States, 114 C. Cls. 415 , and in Hamrick v. United States, 120 C. Cls. 17 .

Wah Chang Corporation v. United States

282 F.2d 728 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 5, 1960

[Quoting from Jones v. … In Sunswick Corp. v.

Stafford Ordnance Corp. v. United States

108 F. Supp. 378 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 2, 1952

Moriarty v. United States, 97 C. Cls. 338 ; Pink v. United States, 85 C. Cls. 121 ; Electric Boat Co. v. United States, 81 C. Cls. 361 . … Florida Dehydration Co. v. United States, 121 C. Cls. 89 .

Granite Construction Co. v. United States

37 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,080 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 17, 1991

In fact, the Board’s decision on a question of law “is entitled to great weight if it is based on the Board’s expertise and is not unreasonable.” Dale Ingram, Inc. v. … There is no rule that a board decision be rendered by the same personnel who presided at the hearing. Peterson-Sharpe Eng’g Corp. v. United States, 6 Cl.Ct. 288, 293 (1984); see also Tri-Cor, Inc. v.

Champion Rivet Co. v. United States

30 F. Supp. 234 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 4, 1939

opinion of the court: The contentions of plaintiff in this case are the same as the contentions advanced by it in support of its claimed right to recover the tax assessed and collected in Lehigh Portland *74 Cement Company v. … Compare Columbia Carbon Co. et al. v. United States, 77 Ct. Cls. 768.

Dittmore-Freimuth Corp. v. The United States

390 F.2d 664 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 16, 1968

Co. v. United States, supra, and River Constr. Corp. v. United States, supra. … Where two versions of the facts are equally probable, this court would normally be constrained to favor the version accepted by the Board. Williamsburg Drapery Co. v.

Barnes v. United States

170 Ct. Cl. 639 · United States Court of Claims · May 14, 1965

Davis et al. v. United States, 164 Ct. … Keim v. United States, 177 U.S. 290 (1900); Eberlein v. United States, 257 U.S. 82 (1921). Plaintiffs’ reliance on our recent decision in Colbath v. United States, 169 Ct. Cl. 414 , 341 F. 2d 626 (1965), is misplaced.

Kjar v. United States

69 F. Supp. 406 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 3, 1947

Cromwell v. County of Sac, 94 U. S. 351 ; Southern Paoific Railroad Co. v. United States, 168 U. S. 1 ; Tait v. Western Maryland Railway Co., 289 U. S. 620 . … McClure v. United States, 98 C. Cls. 381, 391 .

Consolidated Molded Products Corp. v. United States

600 F.2d 793 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 13, 1979

See, for example, Koppers Co. v. United States, 186 Ct. Cl. 142 , 405 F.2d 554 (1968) (issue of fact); Tecon Corp. v. United States, 188 Ct. Cl. 436 , 411 F.2d 1271 (1969) (issue of fact); Stock & Grove, Inc. v. … As this court stated in Broome Construction, Inc. v. United States, 203 Ct. Cl. 521 , 492 F.2d 829 (1974): In this the board was clearly correct.

Unger v. United States

326 F.2d 996 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 24, 1964

The result of the approved decision of the Correction Board was merely to change the character and not the fact o,f discharge. Goldstein v. United States, 131 Ct. Cl. 228 , 130 F. … Peterson v. United States, supra.

Brown

214 Ct. Cl. 731 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 25, 1977

United States v. Brown , Civ. No. 146-73C2. The trial judge granted the stay on July 7, 1977. "It is unclear why plaintiff requests the stay of proceedings to be vacated at this time. … Brown v. United States, 207 Ct. Cl. 768 , 524 F.2d 693 (1975). The contracts are listed in footnote 15 of the court’s opinion.

Hadden v. United States

131 Ct. Cl. 326 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 5, 1955

Ketchum v. St. Louis, 101 U. S. 306 ; Walker v. Brown, 165 U. S. 654 ; United States v. Butterworth-Judson Corp., 267 U. S. 387 . … Duell v. Brewer, supra. Ohio and Pennsylvania, on the other hand, do have such an action. Iddings v. Whitacre, 1 Ohio App. 223 ; Mott v. *341 Danforth, 6 Watts 304 ; Penrod v. Mitchell, 8 Sarg. & R. 522.

Richardson Camera Co. v. United States

467 F.2d 491 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 13, 1972

Moran Bros. v. United States, 171 Ct. Cl. 245, 251 , 346 F. 2d 590, 593 (1965). In Anthony Grace & Sons v. United States, 170 Ct. … In United States v.

St. Regis Paper Co. v. United States

76 F. Supp. 831 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 5, 1948

Van Sant et al., v. United States, 75 Ct.Cl. 562, 566 . In Royal Holland Lloyd v. … In Morrisdale Coal Co. v.

Taylor v. United States

131 Ct. Cl. 387 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 5, 1955

A hearing was held on September 23, 1949, before the Civil Service Board of Appeals and Review, at which plaintiff was represented. This Board upheld the ruling of the hearing examiner. … Croghan v. United States, 116 C. Cls. 577; Wittner v. United States, 110 C. Cls. 231 ; Love v. United States, 119 C. Cls. 486 ; Eberlein v. United States, 257 U. S. 82; Keim v. United States, 177 U. S. 290.

Penguin Industries, Inc. v. United States

530 F.2d 934 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 18, 1976

On these facts, which must be accepted on this appeal, plaintiff has failed to sustain its burden and the Board must be sustained in its conclusion that the data package was not defective, Clark Grave Vault Co. v. … Corp. v. United States, 208 Ct. Cl. 182 , 488 F. 2d 980 (1973); Red Circle Corp. v. United States, 185 Ct. Cl. 1 , 398 F. 2d 836 (1968); *125 Russell R. Cannon Co. v. United States, 189 Ct.

Jones v. United States

617 F.2d 233 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 19, 1980

E.g., Boyce v. United States, 211 Ct. Cl. 57 , 543 F.2d 1290 (1976); Power v. United States, 209 Ct. Cl. 126 , 531 F.2d 505 (1976). … Dittmore-Freimuth Corp. v. United States, 182 Ct.