Case law

Eckstein v. United States

10 F. Supp. 231 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 4, 1935

We think these facts place this case outside the principle announced in Gillespie v. State of Oklahoma, supra; Burnet v. Coronado Oil & Gas Co., supra; Marland v. … In Burnet v. Coronado Oil & Gas Co., supra, the court stated that: “We are disposed to apply the doctrine of Gillespie v.

St. Louis & Mississippi Valley Transportation Co. v. United States

33 Ct. Cl. 251 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 21, 1898

The jurisdiction of the board of harbor masters over the waterfront extends along the 'Algiers shore. (Pickles v. Dry Dock Co., 38 La. Annual, 412.) … (The Brown and the Hamilton Fish, 35 Fed. R., 60; The Fxcelsior, 38 Fed. R., 271; The City of New York, 147 U. S., 72 .)

Borys v. United States

201 Ct. Cl. 597 · United States Court of Claims · May 11, 1973

See Muldonian v. United States, 193 Ct. Cl. 99 , 432 F. 2d 443 (1970); and Krivoski v. United States, 136 Ct. Cl. 451 , 145 F. Supp. 239 (1956), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 954 . … Gen. 742 (1964); and Richard v. United States, 136 Ct. Cl. 33 , 152 F. Supp. 433 (1956). In 43 Comp.

Elchibegoff v. United States

106 Ct. Cl. 541 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 3, 1946

The Economic Defense Board later became known as the Board of Economic Warfare, and still later it became the Foreign Economic Administration, and was placed under the Office for Emergency Management. … It cites the cases of Hart v. United States, 91 C. Cls. 308 ; Krueger v. United States, 83 C. Cls. 412 ; Goodwin v. United States, 76 C. Cls. 218 ; O'Neil v. United States, 56 C. Cls. 89 .

ITT Arctic Services, Inc. v. United States

524 F.2d 680 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 22, 1975

Corp. v. United States, 201 Ct. … Without such specific supported demonstration of factual Board error the Board’s statement of facts will be accepted. Jefferson Constr. Co. v. United States, 177 Ct. Cl. 581, 589 , 368 F. 2d 247, 252 (1966).

Gresham & Co. v. United States

470 F.2d 542 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 12, 1972

Foster Sportswear Co. v. United States, 186 Ct. … Chernick v. United States, 178 Ct. Cl. 498 , 372 F. 2d 492 *121 (1967); Chris Berg, Inc. v. Unnited States, 186 Ct. Cl. 389 , 404 F. 2d 364 (1968); J. A. Jones Constr. Co. v. United States, 182 Ct.

Bodine v. United States

14 Cl. Ct. 661 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 27, 1988

The Board, in Ketchem v. DOT, [12 M.S.P.R. at 2] at 9, took official notice of the fact that an illegal PATCO strike began on August 3, 1981 and continued at least through August 6, 1981. Further, in Schapansky v. … In light of the above, the holding of the Board in Schapansky , and because removal has been held by American Postal Workers Union v.

Farrar v. United States

358 F.2d 965 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 17, 1965

Cl. 272 , 333 F. 2d 861 (1964), and Woodard v. United States, 167 Ct. Cl. 306 (1964). Stone v. United States, 160 Ct. … Accord: Grubin v. United States, 166 Ct. Cl. 272 , 333 F. 2d 861 (1964); Woodard v. United States, 167 Ct. Cl. 306 (1964).

Russell v. United States

314 F.2d 809 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 6, 1963

Friedman v. United States, 159 Ct. Cl. 1 , 310 F. 2d 381 , cert. denied in Lipp v. United States, 373 U.S. 932 ; Odell v. United States, 134 Ct. Cl. 634 ; Gordon v. United States, 134 Ct. Cl. 840 . … Jones v. United States, supra; Taylor v. United States, 143 Ct. Cl. 125 , 163 F. Supp. 652 .

Snellenburg Clothing Co. v. United States

60 Ct. Cl. 592 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 20, 1925

The Board of Contract Adjustment made the following ■certificate: War Department, Board of Contract Adjustment, Washington. Form C. Claim No. 150-C-2119. … Hygienic Fibre Co. v. United States, 59 C. Cls. 598 . Poole Engineering & Machine Co. v. United States, 58 C. Cls. 9 . Judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $5,001. It is so ordered.

Applied Devices Corp. v. United States

591 F.2d 635 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 24, 1979

Healy Co. v. United States, 216 Ct. Cl. 172 , 576 F.2d 299 (1978); C. H. Leavell & Co. v. United States, 208 Ct. Cl. 776 , 530 F.2d 878 (1976). … Co. v. United States, 179 Ct.

Lustbader Construction Co. v. United States

62 Ct. Cl. 549 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 1, 1926

not revise the decision of the board in this case. … The court has allowed the plaintiff the sum of $670.63 for the two items of power wiring and pump foundations and the amount of $1,679.83 above referred to in Finding V, a total of $2,350.46.

Midgett v. United States

603 F.2d 835 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 18, 1979

See Peak v. … In Sanders v. United States, 219 Ct. Cl. 285, 297 , 594 F.2d 804 , 810-11 n. 11 (1979), Judge Bennett discussed the role of correction boards in pay cases.

Kelly v. United States

10 Cl. Ct. 579 · United States Court of Claims · Aug 13, 1986

The Board’s Decision This court may overturn a decision of the Board when it is unsupported by substantial evidence or when there is noncompliance with applicable laws and regulations. Jordan v. … In arriving at its decision, the Board concluded that plaintiff had failed to present sufficient evidence to prove her case. The Board distinguished Barber v.

Century Country Club v. United States

116 F. Supp. 727 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 1, 1953

Burnet v. Harmel, 287 U. S. 103, 110 . … Garden City Golf Club v. Corwin, 62 F. 2d 246 (Circuit Court of Appeals (2d) 1932) ; Fresh Meadow Country Club v. United States, 17 F. Supp. 400 (District Court, Eastern District New York (1936)); Pendennis v.

Art Center School v. United States

142 F. Supp. 916 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 5, 1956

Hemphill Schools, Inc. v. … As was stated in Thomas v.

Jamison v. United States

9 Cl. Ct. 297 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 19, 1985

Friedman v. United States, 159 Ct.Cl. 1 , 310 F.2d 381 (1962), cert. denied sub. nom. Lipp v. United States, 373 U.S. 932 , 83 S.Ct. 1540 , 10 L.Ed.2d 691 (1963); Skopic v. … United States, 178 Ct.Cl. 202, 203 (1967); Miller v. United States, 175 Ct.Cl. 871, 879 , 361 F.2d 245, 249 (1966); Caravella v. United States, 9 Cl.Ct. 280 (1985); Stone v. United States, 4 Cl.Ct. 250, 259 (1984).

Godfrey v. United States

3 Cl. Ct. 595 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 12, 1983

In Mazo v. … In Feist v.

Hutton v. United States

154 Ct. Cl. 34 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 7, 1961

Eberlein v. United States, 257 U.S. 82 ; Culligan v. United States, 107 Ct. Cl. 222 , cert. denied, 330 U.S. 848 ; Bryan v. United States, 128 Ct. Cl. 541 . … Atkinson v. United States, 144 Ct. Cl. 585 ; Misuraca v. United States, 135 Ct. Cl. 387 ; DeBusk v. United States, 132 Ct. Cl. 790 , cert. denied 350 U.S. 988 .

Gelco Builders & Burjay Construction Corp. v. The United States

369 F.2d 992 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 16, 1966

Hoi-Gar Manufacturing Corp. v. United States, supra. Accordingly, the Board's decision with respect thereto is not subject to Wunderlich Act finality, 68 Stat. 81 , 41 U.S.C. §§ 321-322 (1958 ed.). … The Board denied the motion.