Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
1,638 results
0.55s
First Commercial Bank v. Secretary of the Deptartment of Health & Human Services
19 Cl. Ct. 226 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 11, 1989
A medical expert determined that Kari suffered a post-pertussis immunization encephalopathy. Kari will continue to suffer the effects of this vaccine-related disorder throughout her life. … As guardian of the Estate of Kari Janeen McLean, a minor, it is expected that petitioner, First Commercial Bank, will establish appropriate procedures to safeguard the best interests of its ward.
Cited 1 timesPublished21 Cl. Ct. 510 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 10, 1990
Also plaintiffs argue that in 1986, in establishing the Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS), Congress left this definition intact expressing its intent to approve this tax free treatment. … It clearly is an integral part of that annuity which cannot be disregarded in determining the total amount each retiree is due in the aggregate to receive under CSRS.
Cited 25 timesPublishedL. M. Daniels and Clayton G. Leonard v. The United States
407 F.2d 1345 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 14, 1969
It was found that no adequate salary formula could be established upon a classification of the relative functions, experience, and qualifications of the pilots, since most pilots performed or were qualified to perform the … As plaintiffs admit in their cross-motion, defendant’s position is clearly correct. Burich v.
Cited 26 timesPublishedManley v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services
18 Cl. Ct. 799 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 16, 1989
Clearly, the Medical Review, Dr. … Congress clearly intended that fees and costs be distinct from “compensation.”
Cited 8 timesPublishedLockheed Aircraft Corporation v. The United States
375 F.2d 786 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 14, 1967
defeat the government’s immunity. … This would have to be qualified by any special factors that would preclude universal allocation.
Cited 32 timesPublished35 Cont. Cas. Fed. 75,551 · United States Court of Claims · Sep 8, 1988
For two of these claims, because of the lack of credible testimony, the court was forced to use a “jury verdict” approach to establish damages. Esprit Corp. v. … Underwood, 108 S.Ct. at 2553-54 , the Supreme Court stated: [T]he exception for “limited availability of qualified attorneys for the proceedings involved” must refer to attorneys “qualified for the proceedings” in some specialized
Cited 14 timesPublishedEquipment Corp. of America v. United States
98 Ct. Cl. 159 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 5, 1942
Littleton, Judge, delivered the opinion of the court: Upon the facts established by the record and set forth in the findings plaintiff is clearly entitled to judgment for $4,728 under its contract with the defendant as modified … The plaintiff was the lowest qualified bidder.
Cited 0 timesPublished16 Cl. Ct. 447 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 2, 1988
The County Committee found that the plaintiffs qualified as separate “persons.” … In this case, the tax returns clearly are probative.
Cited 11 timesPublished14 Cl. Ct. 795 · United States Court of Claims · May 4, 1988
Henry (taxpayer) commenced operating Qualified Personnel (Qualified) as a sole proprietorship, with its principal place of business in Wilmington, North Carolina. Qualified engaged in business as a labor broker. … During 1980, discussions ensued between IRS and Qualified, principally with Qualified’s agent, Windham, 2 with respect to the claim.
Cited 5 timesPublished14 Cl. Ct. 661 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 27, 1988
The evidence clearly indicates that appellant’s incapacity, if any, ceased as of July 23, 1981. … Brooks, M.D., contained in the CA-16 report stated that he was fit for duty on July 23, 1981, thus clearly and directly contradicting his claim of disability. (Agency Exhibit D.)
Cited 8 timesPublishedBernard G. Browning v. The United States
373 F.2d 915 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 17, 1967
United States, 153 Ct.Cl. 392 (1961), which is clearly factually distinguishable from the case at bar. … The regulations of his agency, the Department of Agriculture, clearly prescribe that in such a situation, the separation shall be considered involuntary for retirement purposes.
Cited 6 timesPublishedConservative Caucus, Inc. v. United States
650 F.2d 1206 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 3, 1981
Since the applicable statutes and regulations granted USPS broad discretion concerning postal refunds, the agency decision is entitled to finality, because it was not clearly wrong nor contrary to law. … Consequently, since we find that the decision denying plaintiffs claim for refund was not clearly wrong, nor contrary to law, it is entitled to finality.
Cited 13 timesPublishedPenn Security Life Insurance v. United States
524 F.2d 1155 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 22, 1975
as a life insurance company: Qualifying reserves (numerator) 1. … Supp. 600 (1959), established a “reserves follow the risk” rule for tax purposes.
Cited 6 timesPublished2 Cl. Ct. 111 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 22, 1983
and subsequent service was deemed to be a constructive enlistment. 3 3 Bull JAG 410 reports a case wherein constructive delivery of a discharge was not extended to a servicewoman absent without leave, in order to avoid immunizing … Plaintiff had not completed 18 years’ service as of the discharge date established by statute. 4 *115 2.
Cited 10 timesPublishedContinental Business Enterprises, Inc. v. United States
452 F.2d 1016 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 10, 1971
It is true that the contracting officer included a provision in the KFP in which he claimed the option to award the contract to the most qualified offeror, without granting others the opportunity to negotiate. … Nor has defendant demonstrated the existence of price competition adequate enough to assure the Government that a fair and reasonable price proposal would have been received initially from the most qualified offeror.
Cited 58 timesPublishedThe Connecticut Light and Power Company and Subsidiaries v. The United States
368 F.2d 233 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 10, 1966
Plaintiff attempted to purchase *236 such rights and immunity, but such negotiations were unsuccessful. … Such payments enabled taxpayer to build and operate its Shepaug project with immunity from any future tort liability. Such immunity is of continuing value to the taxpayer.
Cited 8 timesPublished546 F.2d 431 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 12, 1976
Again plaintiff’s application was denied due to insufficient evidence to establish a showing of probable error or injustice. … The vague and ambiguous con-clusory statements offered by plaintiff do not qualify as such evidence.
Cited 2 timesPublished6 Cl. Ct. 441 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 5, 1984
Sovereign Immunity Defendant’s motion to dismiss makes a broadside attack on grounds that sovereign immunity has not been waived on the implied-in-fact contract alleged in plaintiffs’ third cause of action. … Plaintiffs’ claims clearly do not grow out of, depend upon, or have their foundation in some treaty stipulation. See United States v.
Cited 75 timesPublished6 Cl. Ct. 400 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 5, 1984
Therefore, it is not sufficient to argue, in attempting to establish jurisdiction, that the alleged tortious conduct is related in some general sense to the contractual relationship between the parties. … These alleged acts clearly establish a definite connection between the alleged tor-tious conduct and the contractual obligation^) owed to Mr. Beauchamp by defendant.
Cited 4 timesPublished35 Ct. Cl. 568 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 4, 1900
The provi *572 sions of these two statutes, applied in connection with tbe act under which this proceeding was commenced, clearly entitle the claimant to recover full sea pay from the time the decedent was.appointed to take … The claimant, by the facts found, establishes a right to recover, and a judgment will therefore be entered for the sum of six hundred dollars ($600.00).
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna