Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscc

6,266 results

1.76s

  • Luff v. United States

    100 F. Supp. 925 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 6, 1951

    Robert Peysert et al. v. The United States, 41 C. Cls. 311 ; Utah Fuel Co. v. National Bituminous Coal Commission et al., 306 U. S. 56, 60 ; Peyton v. Railway Express Agency, 316 U. … That Board properly dismissed the appeal because it was filed too late.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Condenser Service & Engineering Co. v. United States

    128 F. Supp. 148 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 8, 1955

    Board. … In Hanson v. United States, 117 C. Cls. 605 , we awarded an amount less than the Appeal Board had allowed. The question so warmly contested in the instant case was not raised by the parties and we were not aware of it.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Foster Wheeler Corp. v. United States

    513 F.2d 588 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 19, 1975

    Co. v. United States, 149 Ct.Cl. 514, 518 (1960). To the extent that the Board’s decision was one of law, this court is, of course, free to arrive at its own conclusions. Tombigbee Constructors v. … V Assumption of the Risk of Impossibility The Board found 20 that FWC generally assumed “contractual responsibility and risk” of impossibility.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Penguin Industries, Inc. v. United States

    530 F.2d 934 · United States Court of Claims · Feb 18, 1976

    On these facts, which must be accepted on this appeal, plaintiff has failed to sustain its burden and the Board must be sustained in its conclusion that the data package was not defective, Clark Grave Vault Co. v. … Corp. v. United States, 208 Ct. Cl. 182 , 488 F. 2d 980 (1973); Red Circle Corp. v. United States, 185 Ct. Cl. 1 , 398 F. 2d 836 (1968); *125 Russell R. Cannon Co. v. United States, 189 Ct.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Joyce v. United States

    2 Cl. Ct. 226 · United States Court of Claims · Apr 5, 1983

    Pascal v. United States, 211 Ct.Cl. 183, 189 , 543 F.2d 1284, 1288 (1976). … Harvin v. United States, No. 167-80C at 7 (Ct.Cl. 1981), 661 F.2d 885, 889 (1981).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Johnson Controls, Inc. v. United States

    30 Cont. Cas. Fed. 70,445 · United States Court of Claims · Oct 13, 1982

    Subsequently, the Federal Republic of Germany contracted with the consortium of Brown, Boveri, & Cie AG and plaintiff to perform the work. … Due to difficulties encountered during the project, Brown, Boveri & Cie AG terminated its consortium agreement with the plaintiff.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Werking v. United States

    4 Cl. Ct. 101 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 19, 1983

    Hary v. United States, 223 Ct.Cl. 10, 15, 17 , 618 F.2d 704, 706, 707 (1980). See also Depte v. United States, 715 F.2d 1481 (Fed.Cir.1983). … In Peters v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Neumann

    618 F.2d 119 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 26, 1979

    the unlawful action amounted to arbitrary and capricious conduct on the part of the Correction Board. … Cason v. United States, supra, 200 Ct. Cl. at 431 , 471 F. 2d at 1229 ; Grisham v. United States, 183 Ct. Cl. 657 , 392 F. 2d 980 , cert. denied, 393 U. S. 843 (1968); Gersten v. United States, 176 Ct.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Rose Hills Memorial Park Ass'n v. United States

    463 F.2d 425 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 14, 1972

    Despite the fact that the certificate holders were not shareholders, the Tax Court characterized the transfers as contributions to equity capital, citing Brown Shoe Co. v. Commissioner, 339 U.S. 583, 589 (1950). … Plaintiff, relying on Commissioner v. Brown, 380 U.S. 563 (1965), argues that if a valid sale has occurred, the above-mentioned criteria for determining the degree of risk-shifting become inapplicable.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • National Line Co.

    214 Ct. Cl. 807 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 21, 1977

    Under the rule of Nager Electric Co. v. United States, 184 Ct. … Nager Electric Co., Inc. v. United States, supra, 184 Ct. Cl. at 401 , 396 F.2d at 982-83 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Allied Materials & Equipment Co.

    223 Ct. Cl. 657 · United States Court of Claims · Mar 14, 1980

    The applicability of the standards enunciated in United States v. Utah Construction Co., supra, is not contested. … to a dispute properly before [the board].”

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Dynalectron Corp. v. United States

    518 F.2d 594 · United States Court of Claims · Jul 11, 1975

    Cl. 996 (1972), refused to review the Board denial of excess reprocurement costs to the Government. We cited S & E Contractors, Inc. v. United States, 406 U.S. 1 (1972). … Cl. 518 , 360 F. 2d 634 (1966 ); Natus Corp. v. United States, 178 Ct. Cl. 1 , 371 F. 2d 450 (1967); Tecon Corp. v. United States, 188 Ct. Cl. 436 , 411 F. 2d 1271 (1969); Tombigbee Constructors v.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Garstin v. United States

    352 F.2d 537 · United States Court of Claims · Nov 12, 1965

    Knoell, et al. v. United States, 236 F. Supp. 299 (D.C.W.D.Pa. 1964). See also Love v. United States, 141 F. 2d 981 (8th Cir. 1944); United States v. … Wilson v. United States, 151 Ct. Cl. 271 (1960) and Robert E. Davis v. United States, 164 Ct. Cl. 162 (1964).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Schutt Construction Co. v. United States

    353 F.2d 1018 · United States Court of Claims · Dec 17, 1965

    E.g., Peter Kiewit Sons' Co. v. United States, 109 Ct. Cl. 517 , 74 F. Supp. 165 (1947); Chernus v. United States, 110 Ct. Cl. 264 (1948); Loftis v. United States, 110 Ct. Cl. 551 , 76 F. … Fehlhaber Corporation v. United States, supra. However, the further conclusion of the Board that recovery should be limited to the excess acreage over IS percent is not based on any strong legal ground.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Russell & Pugh Lumber Company v. United States

    290 F.2d 938 · United States Court of Claims · Jun 7, 1961

    price per thousand board feet, was included. … See e. g., Breese Burners, Inc. v. United States, 1954, 121 F.Supp. 530 , 128 Ct.Cl. 649 ; Peter Kiewit Sons’ Co. v. United States, 1947, 109 Ct.Cl. 390 .

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Moran Bros. v. United States

    61 Ct. Cl. 73 · United States Court of Claims · Aug 14, 1925

    all review of the board’s action. … United States v. North Carolina, 136 U.S. 211, 216 . See also Sherman case, 98 U. S. 565 ; Angarica v. Bayard, 127 U.S. 251, 260 .

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Martin v. Department of the Air Force

    227 Ct. Cl. 742 · United States Court of Claims · May 22, 1981

    Alonzo v. Department of the Air Force, No. DA075209013; Coefield v. Department of the Navy, No. SF07509012; and Russell v. Department of the Interior, No. SF075209018. … The Board refused the appeal because of failure to meet these criteria.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Borys v. United States

    201 Ct. Cl. 597 · United States Court of Claims · May 11, 1973

    See Muldonian v. United States, 193 Ct. Cl. 99 , 432 F. 2d 443 (1970); and Krivoski v. United States, 136 Ct. Cl. 451 , 145 F. Supp. 239 (1956), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 954 . … Gen. 742 (1964); and Richard v. United States, 136 Ct. Cl. 33 , 152 F. Supp. 433 (1956). In 43 Comp.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Pope v. United States

    15 Cl. Ct. 218 · United States Court of Claims · Aug 8, 1988

    Craft v. … In Best v.

    Overruled — as noted by a later courtCited 13 timesPublished
  • Bailey v. United States

    171 F. Supp. 281 · United States Court of Claims · Jan 14, 1959

    The Supreme Court and this court have consistently, and in a large number of cases, applied the bar of laches; among those cases, Dion v. United States, 137 Ct.Cl. 166 ; Baskin v. … United States, 95 Ct.Cl. 455 , certiorari denied, 1942, 316 U.S. 675 , 62 S.Ct. 1043 , 86 L.Ed. 1749 ; Nicholas v. United States, 1921, 257 U.S. 71 , 42 S.Ct. 7 , 66 L.Ed. 133 ; United States ex rel. Arant v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.