Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscasd1897

3,618 results

0.35s

  • Brown v. Parker

    39 F. Supp. 895 · District Court, S.D. California · Jul 9, 1941

    “(quoting from Cargill Co. v. … Elevator Co. v. Langer, supra.]

    Reversed on other grounds by Parker v. Brown, 317 U.S. 341 (1943)Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Lee

    51 F. Supp. 85 · District Court, S.D. California · Aug 12, 1943

    Much reliance is placed by defendants upon the case of Brown, Administrator, etc., v. … Lloyd Arnold, Judge, etc., 26 S.E.2d 238 , decided by the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia on June 8, 1943, and upon the decision rendered in Brown, Administrator v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Neal v. Brown

    451 F. Supp. 1335 · District Court, S.D. California · May 18, 1978

    The Board for Correction of Naval Records is a viable administrative remedy, Craycroft v. … Sampson v. Murray, supra.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Great Lakes Higher Education Corp. v. Brown (In Re Brown)

    99 Daily Journal DAR 10593 · District Court, S.D. California · Jul 29, 1999

    It held that the Browns would suffer an undue hardship if they were forced to repay their student loans. See Brown v. Salliemae Servicing Corp. (In re Brown), 227 B.R. 540, 548 (Bankr.S.D.Cal.1998). … See Brown, 227 B.R. at 547 . It is clear that a B.A.P. ruling does not bind this Court. See Bank of Maui v.

    Cited 32 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Allstate Insurance

    17 F. Supp. 2d 1134 · District Court, S.D. California · Jul 31, 1998

    BACKGROUND Michael Brown (“Plaintiff’) owns two plumbing companies that performed plumbing contracting and insurance claim work for Allstate Insurance Company (“Allstate”). … [that] can act only through its duly constituted organs, primarily its board of directors.” John Alexander & Harry Henn, Laws of Corporations, 145-146 (West 1989).

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Adidas Int.

    938 F. Supp. 628 · District Court, S.D. California · Apr 15, 1996

    Forro Precision, Inc. v. Int’l Bus. Machines, 673 F.2d 1045, 1056-57 (9th Cir.1982). Brown’s complaint fails to set forth sufficiently a claim of trade secret infringement. … See Moore v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • United States v. Brown

    110 F. Supp. 370 · District Court, S.D. California · Aug 25, 1952

    Brown resides in and is the Public Administrator of Los Angeles County, California; and is the duly appointed, qualified and acting administra *371 tor of the estate of Robert P. … United States v. Gallagher, D.C.So.Cal.1952, 97 F.Supp. 1014 , Weinberger, J.; In re Bonner’s Estate, 1948, 192 Misc. 753 , 80 N.Y.S.2d 122, 126-127 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Brown v. United States

    152 F. Supp. 107 · District Court, S.D. California · Jun 4, 1957

    . *108 V That the said first trust deed was recorded prior to the second trust deed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. United States

    226 F. Supp. 968 · District Court, S.D. California · Feb 26, 1964

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Zehring v. Brown Materials, Ltd.

    48 F. Supp. 740 · District Court, S.D. California · Jan 19, 1943

    Let Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law be drawn accordingly. 1 Gibbons v. Ogden, 9 Wheat. 1, 194 , 6 L.Ed. 23 . 2 National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. … Walling, supra. 9 United States v. Darby, supra. 10 Warren-Bradshaw Drilling Co. v. Hall, 63 S.Ct. 125 , 87 L.Ed. —, Nov. 9, 1942. 11 Womack v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Glick Bros. Lumber Co.

    52 F. Supp. 913 · District Court, S.D. California · Dec 2, 1943

    Parsons v. Bedford, 3 Pet. 433 , 7 L.Ed. 732 ; United States v. Coombs, 12 Pet. 72 , 9 L.Ed. 1004 ; New York, etc., R. R. Co. v. United States, 212 U.S. 481 , 29 S.Ct. 304 , 53 L.Ed. 613 . … Knowlton v. Moore, 178 U.S. 41 , 20 S.Ct. 747 , 44 L.Ed. 969 , see also United States Sugar Equalization Board, Inc., v. P. De Ronde & Co., 3 Cir., 7 F.2d 981 .

    Reversed on other grounds by Bowles v. Glick Bros. Lumber Co., 146 F.2d 566 (1945)Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Brown v. United States

    54 F. Supp. 663 · District Court, S.D. California · Nov 1, 1941

    Brown at the time of his death. I have studied very carefully the cases relied on by the Government. Helvering v. … The Board of Tax Appeals in the majority opinion just cited assumes that Helvering v. Hallock overrules May v. Heiner, 1930, 281 U.S. 238 , 50 S.Ct. 286 , 74 L.Ed. 826 , 67 A.L.R. 1244 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Burger v. Social Security Board

    66 F. Supp. 619 · District Court, S.D. California · May 15, 1946

    North Whittier Heights Citrus Ass’n v. National Labor Relations Board, 9 Cir., 1940, 109 F.2d 76 ; National Labor Relations Board v. Tovrea Packing Co., 9 Cir., 1940, 111 F.2d 626 ; Idaho Potato Growers v. … The Board’s decisions interpreting the Act and regulations are entitled to great weight United States v. Lalone, 9 Cir., 1945, 152 F.2d 43 ; Walker v. Altmeyer, 2 Cir., 1943, 137 F.2d 531 ; Social Security Board v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Pesante

    119 F. Supp. 444 · District Court, S.D. California · Feb 17, 1954

    Edwards v. N. L. R. B., 5 Cir., 1951, 189 F.2d 970 ; Jackson Packing Co. v. N. L. R. B., 5 Cir., 1953, 204 F.2d 842 , and N. L. R. B. v. … B. v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Stanz v. Brown

    District Court, S.D. California · Jan 7, 2025

    Plaintiff, COUNSEL 14 v. … 15 [ECF No. 179] Defendants JORDAN BROWN; et al.,

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Brown-Crummer Inv. Co. v. City of Burbank

    17 F. Supp. 469 · District Court, S.D. California · Dec 10, 1936

    The Brown-Crummer Investment Company, a corporation of the State of Kansas, as complainant, filed two suits in equity against the City of Burbank, a municipal corporation in the County of Los Angeles, State of California, … Board of Supervisors (C.C.) 28 F. 223 ; Id., 120 U.S. 450 , 7 S.Ct. 633 , 30 L.Ed. 743 ; Shepard v. Tulare Irrigation District, supra.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Wylie v. State Board of Equalization

    21 F. Supp. 604 · District Court, S.D. California · Dec 14, 1937

    See Premier-Pabst Sales Company v. State Board of Equalization, D.C.Cal.1935, 13 F.Supp. 90 ; Mugler v. Kansas, 1887, 123 U.S. 623 , 8 S.Ct. 273 , 31 L.Ed. 205 . … As interpreted by the Supreme Court in State Board of Equalization v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Elliott v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board

    233 F. Supp. 578 · District Court, S.D. California · Sep 22, 1964

    Home Loan Bank Board v. … The Bank Board relies heavily on Fahey v.

    Reversed on other grounds by Federal Home Loan Bank Board v. Elliott, 386 F.2d 42 (1967)Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Bouari v. Brown

    District Court, S.D. California · Aug 20, 2025

    McHenry v. … In 5 Hearns v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Mansueto v. Brown

    District Court, S.D. California · Aug 19, 2025

    Simon v. … Butko v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.