Case law

United States v. San Diego Grocers Association, Inc.

177 F. Supp. 352 · District Court, S.D. California · Oct 8, 1959

Gallo Winery v. C. I. … United States v. Safeway Stores Inc., supra, 140 F.2d at page 836 .

Arrowhead Freight Lines, Ltd. v. United States

115 F. Supp. 537 · District Court, S.D. California · Sep 23, 1953

Exceptions to the report of the Joint Board were filed and, on April 8, 1952, the Commission, Division 5, 49 U.S.C.A. § 17 , filed its report and entered the order under review. See Fleetlines, Inc. v. … Corp. v. United States, 1939, 307 U.S. 125, 139-140 , 59 S.Ct. 754 , 83 L.Ed. 1147 ; I. C. C. v. Union Pac. R. R.

Whyte v. City of San Diego

District Court, S.D. California · May 26, 2022

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting 7 Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 547 (2007)). … See Board of Cty. Comm’rs. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997); 2 Monell, 436 U.S. at 691 (“[A] municipality cannot be held liable solely because it 3 employs a tortfeasor.”); Jackson v.

Security-First Natlional Bank v. United States

181 F. Supp. 911 · District Court, S.D. California · Feb 29, 1960

foregoing provisions, I give, devise and bequeath the remainder of my said estate in whatever form it may consist at the decease of my said wife to my devoted children: Donald Riley of Chicago, Illinois, and Dorothy Riley Brown … United States v. Cooke, 9 Cir., 1955, 228 E.2d 667. Two district courts in our Circuit have since followed this decision: Brown v. United States, D.C.

F. & A. Ice Cream Co. v. Arden Farms Co.

98 F. Supp. 180 · District Court, S.D. California · Jun 4, 1951

. § 506 (a) (1). [42] United States v. Petrillo, 1947, 332 U.S. 1, 7 , 67 S.Ct. 1538, 1542 , 91 L.Ed. 1877 . [43] United States Constitution, Article I, Sec. 8, Clause 3. And see, National Labor Relations Board v. … Board of Fire Underwriters of the Pacific, 1946, 29 Cal.2d 34, 46-51 , 172 P.2d 867 ; and see, Frost v. Corporation Commissioner of Oklahoma, 1929, 278 U.S. 515, 526-527 , 49 S.Ct. 235 , 73 L.Ed. 483 ; Kay v.

Pemberton v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC

District Court, S.D. California · Jan 15, 2020

Brown (“Brown Decl.”) ¶¶ 3–8, ECF No. 132-2; Decl. 9 of David J. Vendler (“Vendler Decl.”) ¶¶ 2–18, ECF No. 132-2.) … (Brown Decl. ¶ 24). 13 Generally, “[t]he recommendations of plaintiffs’ counsel should be given a 14 presumption of reasonableness.” Boyd v. Bechtel Corp., 485 F.

Orient Steam Navigation Company v. United States

231 F. Supp. 469 · District Court, S.D. California · May 6, 1964

The ORIANA concedes that she had on board, not only a relative motion radar, but also the Decca true motion radar, previously mentioned. … Skibs A/S Siljestad v. S/S Mathew Luckenbach, 215 F.Supp. 667 (S.D.N.Y.1963); Afran Transport Co. v. Bergechief, supra, and Polarus Steamship Co. v.

In Re Zimmer

63 F. Supp. 488 · District Court, S.D. California · Dec 3, 1945

Howell, 10 Cir., 1941, 123 F.2d 50, 51 ; In re Brown, D.C.N.H. 1940, 35 F.Supp. 619 . The petition to reopen did not recite that there were other assets to administer. … In Cohen v.

Van Sickel v. United States

179 F. Supp. 791 · District Court, S.D. California · Dec 30, 1959

Thus, Feres v. … United States v. Brown, 348 U.S. 110, 112 , 75 S.Ct. 141,143 , 99 L.Ed. 139 : “The Feres decision did not disapprove of the Brooks case [Brooks v. United States, 337 U.S. 49 , 69 S. Ct. 918 , 93 L.Ed. 1200 ].

Russell v. City of San Diego

District Court, S.D. California · Jan 24, 2025

Moss v. U.S. … See Brown, 520 U.S. at 410.

Maye v. Berryhill

District Court, S.D. California · Sep 25, 2019

See, e.g., Brown- 13 Hunter v. Colvin, 806 F.3d 487, 488-89 (9th Cir. 2015); Vasquez v. Astrue, 572 F.3d 586, 14 591 (9th Cir. 2009); Bunnell v. … See Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 489, 28 493, 494; see also, e.g., Burrell v. Colvin, 775 F.3d 1133, 1138 (9th Cir. 2014); Reddick v. 1 Chater, 157 F.3d 715, 722 (9th Cir. 1998); Smolen v.

Brooks Bros. v. Brooks Clothing of California, Ltd.

60 F. Supp. 442 · District Court, S.D. California · May 5, 1945

Cox, 4 Cir., 1942, 124 F.2d 650, 653 . 9 Cardozo: The Nature of the Judicial Process, 1921, p. 141. 10 Brown Chemical Co. v. Meyer, 1891, 139 U.S. 540 , 11 S.Ct. 625 , 35 L.Ed. 247 ; Higgins Co. v. … Algoma Lumber Co., 1934, 291 U.S. 67, 81 , 54 S.Ct. 315, 321 , 78 L.Ed. 655 . 33 Randel v. Brown, 1844, 2 How. 406 , 11 L.Ed. 318 ; Stonega Coke & Coal Co. v.

United States v. Spector

102 F. Supp. 75 · District Court, S.D. California · Dec 14, 1951

that the approved program is slavishly followed ■by the members of the Party * * Another of the circumstances surrounding the offense charged is the matter of common knowledge, of which the court may take judicial notice, Brown … It is a matter of general knowledge which the court may judicially notice, Parker v. Brown, 1943, 317 U.S. 341, 363 , 63 S.Ct. 307 , 87 L.Ed. 315 ; Jefferson Electric Co. v. N. L. R.

Harris v. United States

919 F. Supp. 343 · District Court, S.D. California · Feb 26, 1996

Greenlaw v. Garrett, 59 F.3d 994, 997 (9th Cir.1995) (citing Brown v. General Services Administration, 425 U.S. 820, 832 , 96 S.Ct. 1961, 1967 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976)). … In Johnson v.

Ryan v. County of Imperial

District Court, S.D. California · Sep 29, 2022

Corp. v. … A government board meeting is a limited public 3 forum. Kindt v. Santa Monica Rent Control Bd., 67 F.3d 266, 270 (9th Cir. 1995).

Moore v. Saul

District Court, S.D. California · Oct 26, 2021

Lambert, 980 F.3d at 26 1277 (quoting Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 494); see also Vladimir B. v. Saul, 1 Cal. … Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 494.

Dunsmore v. State of California

District Court, S.D. California · Aug 15, 2022

Brown, No. C 94-2307 CW (N.D. Cal. Aug. 12, 2012), (id.). … Ross v. Blake, 578 U.S. 632, 643 (2016); cf. Brown v.

Jones v. San Diego Sheriffs Dept.

District Court, S.D. California · Aug 5, 2025

See Board of Cnty. Comm’rs. v. … Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997); Monell v. 27 Dep’t of Social Servs., 436 U.S. 658, 691 (1978) (“[A] a municipality cannot be held liable 28 solely because it employs a tortfeasor.”); Jackson v.

Luce v. Dalton

166 F.R.D. 457 · District Court, S.D. California · Apr 1, 1996

Moore v. … In Hicks v.

Solar Integrated Roofing Corp. v. Massey

District Court, S.D. California · Sep 11, 2024

BACKGROUND1 16 Defendant Massey was the Chief Executive Officer and a member of the Board of 17 Directors (“Board” or “the Board”) of SIRC. FAC ¶¶ 2, 18–19. … SIRC has also not plausibly alleged any facts regarding how 11 fraudulent statements by Massey to the Board about his compensation caused its 12 damages. See Lazar v.