Case law

Smith v. United States

174 F. Supp. 828 · District Court, S.D. California · Jul 9, 1959

But after examination of the authorities, particularly Stanley v. U. … Armes, 1882, 107 U.S. 519 at page -521, 2 S.Ct. 840 , at page 841, 27 L.Ed. 618 ; People v.

Keefe v. American Pac. S. S. Co.

110 F. Supp. 853 · District Court, S.D. California · Feb 19, 1953

Aguilar v. Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey, 1942, 318 U.S. 724 , 63 S.Ct. 930 , 87 L.Ed. 1107 ; Farrell v. United States, 1948, 336 U.S. 511 , 69 S.Ct. 707 , 93 L.Ed. 850 ; Warren v. … Aguilar decision has been to expand and elasticize the meaning and extent of the phrase ‘in the service of the ship’ so that at the present time it virtually encompasses all of the seaman’s activity from the time he first boards

Noem

District Court, S.D. California · Oct 24, 2025

Hernandez v. Sessions, 872 F.3d 976, 988 (9th Cir. 2017) 22 (quoting Laing v. … Rivera v. 24 Broomfield, No. 21-CV-6520-HSG, 2023 WL 4269763, at *7 (N.D. Cal. June 28, 2023) 25 (quoting Brown v.

DELA CRUZ v. Napolitano

764 F. Supp. 2d 1197 · District Court, S.D. California · Jan 27, 2011

Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745, 757 , 102 S.Ct. 1388 , 71 L.Ed.2d 599 (1982) (emphasis in original) (quoting Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 344 , 96 S.Ct. 893 , 47 L.Ed.2d 18 (1976)); see also Addington v. … See Foucha v.

Jonathan Club v. United States

220 F. Supp. 704 · District Court, S.D. California · Aug 7, 1963

Louisville Country Club, Inc. v. Gray, D.C., 178 F.Supp. 915 (1959). … City Athletic Club v. United States, 242 F.2d 43, at p. 44 (2nd Cir. 1957).

Clayborn

District Court, S.D. California · Nov 17, 2025

However, a local government entity may not be held vicariously 23 liable for the unconstitutional acts of its employees under the theory of respondeat superior. 24 See Board of Cty. Comm’rs. of Bryan Cty. v. … Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997); Monell, 25 436 U.S. at 691; Fuller v.

Fayette v. American Pac. S. S. Co.

121 F. Supp. 543 · District Court, S.D. California · Jun 4, 1954

As early as 1873 in United States v. … In Uravic v. F.

In re Sears

152 F. Supp. 55 · District Court, S.D. California · May 16, 1957

v. … Allen, 1953, 344 U.S. 443 , 73 S.Ct. 397 , 97 L.Ed. 469 ; Darr v. Burford, 1950, 339 U.S. 200 , 70 S.Ct. 587 , 94 L.Ed. 761 ; White v. Ragen, 1945, 324 U.S. 760, 764 , 65 S.Ct. 978 , 89 L.Ed. 1348 ; cf: Frisbie v.

Miholich v. The Real Brokerage, Inc.

District Court, S.D. California · Jun 4, 2025

Kamakana v. … Declaration of Garland Brown (ECF No. 46, Ex. 3); 7 4. Declaration of Sharran Srivatsaa (ECF No. 49, Ex. 4); and 8 5.

Bernard v. City of San Diego

District Court, S.D. California · Jul 29, 2021

See Board of Cty. 18 Comm’rs. v. … Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997); Monell, 436 U.S. at 691 (“[A] a 19 municipality cannot be held liable solely because it employs a tortfeasor.”); Jackson v. 20 Barnes, 749 F.3d 755, 762 (9th Cir. 2014).

Wainscott v. County of San Diego

District Court, S.D. California · Mar 3, 2021

Com’rs of Bryan Cnty., Okl. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 (1997). Rather, 28 to prevail on a Section 1983 claim, a Plaintiff must identify that a municipal policy or 1 custom caused the alleged injury. … Brown, 520 U.S. at 403; see Daniel v. Contra Costa 2 Cnty. Sheriff’s Dept., Case No. 16-cv-02037-EMC, 2016 WL 5109992, at *2 (N.D. Cal. 3 Sept. 21, 2016).

Marler v. Chater

953 F. Supp. 322 · District Court, S.D. California · Dec 15, 1995

Flaten v. Sec’y of HHS, 44 F.3d 1453, 1457 (9th Cir.1995). … Sprague v. Bowen, 812 F.2d 1226, 1230 (9th Cir.1987).

Gonzalez v. Millard Mall Services, Inc.

281 F.R.D. 455 · District Court, S.D. California · Mar 2, 2012

See Hadjavi v. CVS Pharm., Inc., 2011 WL 3240763 (C.D.Cal.2011) (denying class certification because plaintiffs failed to establish existence of a common core of facts or shared legal issues); Brown v. … Brown v. Ralphs Grocery Co., 197 Cal.App.4th 489, 501 , 128 Cal.Rptr.3d 854 (2011). In Arias v.

Do-Nguyen v. Clinton

100 F. Supp. 2d 1241 · District Court, S.D. California · Jun 1, 2000

For example, in Schlesinger v. … Koohi v. United States, 976 F.2d 1328, 1331 (9th Cir.1992). In Baker v.

Alexander Anderson, Inc. v. Eastman

16 F. Supp. 513 · District Court, S.D. California · Sep 26, 1936

Only recently, in Buono v. … Seymour v. Osborne, 11 Wall. 516 , 20 L.Ed. 33 ; Permutit Co. v. Harvey Laundry Co. (C.C.A.2) 279 F. 713, 718 ; Permutit Co. v. Wadham (C.C.A.6) 13 F.(2d) 454, 456 ; Loew Filter Co. v. German-American Filter Co.

Stork v. United States

278 F. Supp. 869 · District Court, S.D. California · Jul 7, 1967

In Eastern Air Lines v. … In the recent case of Ingham v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc. v.

Maurer v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 569

219 F. Supp. 3d 1017 · District Court, S.D. California · Nov 7, 2016

See Balistren v. Pacifica Police Dep’t., 901 F.2d 696, 699 (9th Cir. 1990). … Aguirre v. Automotive Teamsters, 633 F.2d 168, 172 (9th Cir. 1980).

Cooper v. Tokyo Electric Power Co.

990 F. Supp. 2d 1035 · District Court, S.D. California · Nov 26, 2013

Carmichael v. Kellogg, Brown & Root Serv., Inc., 572 F.3d 1271, 1280 (11th Cir.2009) (citing 369 U.S. at 217 , 82 S.Ct. 691 ). … Co. v.

The Arakan

11 F.2d 791 · District Court, S.D. California · Jan 5, 1926

As I held in The Mursa (Newhall v. … United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation) 8 F.(2d) 422 , the fact of damage in only one place is a suspicious circumstance, indicating unseaworthiness, rather than injury resulting from a peril of the sea.

United States v. Shaw

33 F. Supp. 531 · District Court, S.D. California · Jun 14, 1940

Brown v. Walker, 1896, 161 U.S. 591 , 16 S.Ct. 644 , 40 L.Ed. 819 . When there is no compulsion, and there is voluntary appearance, all grounds for the application of the guaranty are gone. Sherwin v. … Cooke, v. Swope, D.C. Wash., 1939, 28 F.Supp. 492 ; Cooke v. Swope, 9 Cir., 1940, 109 F.2d 955 ; Buckner v. Hudspeth, 1939, 10 Cir., 105 F.2d 396 ;. McCoy v. Hudspeth, 1939, 10 Cir., 106 F.2d 810 .