Case law

McGregor v. Sears Roebuck & Co.

107 F. Supp. 918 · District Court, S.D. California · Oct 21, 1952

Brown v. Holzwasser, Inc., 1930, 108 Cal.App. 483, 487-488 , 291 P. 661 ; Hodge v. Weinstock, Lubin & Co., 1930, 109 Cal.App. 393 , 293 P. 80 ; Tuttle v. Crawford, 1936, 8 Cal.2d 126 , 63 P.2d 1128 ; Girvetz v. … On the contrary, the case is even stronger than Matherne v.

Mitchell v. Stephens

285 F. 756 · District Court, S.D. California · Dec 27, 1922

It stands as conceded, in view of the holdings of the Supreme Court of the state of California in Ellis v. Stephens, 185 Cal. 720 , 198 Pac. 403 , and Stephens v. … So, also, in Porter v. Sabin, 149 U. S. 473 , 13 Sup. Ct. 1008, 37 L.

United States v. San Diego County

75 F. Supp. 619 · District Court, S.D. California · Nov 7, 1947

United States, 1919, 250 U.S. 123, 125 , 39 S.Ct. 407 , 63 L.Ed. 889 ; United States v. Minnesota, 1926, 270 U.S. 181, 191 , 46 S.Ct. 298 , 70 L.Ed. 539 ; Board of Commissioners v. … United States, 9 Cir., 1904, 130 F. 659 ; United States v. Miller, 8 Cir., 1928, 28 F.2d 846 , 61 A.L.R. 405 ; Stroud v. Johnston, 9 Cir., 1943, 139 F.2d 171 ; United States v.

In re James Irr. Dist.

25 F. Supp. 974 · District Court, S.D. California · Jan 10, 1939

Corp. v. City of San Buenaventura, 7 Cal.2d 701 , 62 P.2d 583 ; Brown-Crummer Inv. Co. v. City of Burbank et al., D.C., 17 F.Supp. 469 .

Morrow v. Berkeley Bank for Cooperatives

375 F. Supp. 681 · District Court, S.D. California · Apr 19, 1974

See Brown v. Jensen, 41 Cal.2d 193 , 259 P.2d 425 (1953).

Hertel

District Court, S.D. California · Nov 14, 2025

The Court subsequently appointed The Brown Law Firm, P.C., as lead counsel 17 for Plaintiffs in the Derivative Lawsuits. … McCown v.

Hoeppel v. Westover

79 F. Supp. 794 · District Court, S.D. California · Sep 14, 1948

While there is a dearth of judicial decision on the legal question posed in this action, there have been successive rulings by the Board of Tax Appeals previous to the enactment of Public Law Number 262, 74th Congress, upon … Paxton v. Commissioner, etc., 1927, 8 B.T.A. 1105 ; Marcum v. Commissioner, etc., 1928, 10 B.T.A. 1192 ; Bickford v. Commissioner, etc., 1936, 34 B.T.A. 461, 465 .

In Re Estrada's Market

222 F. Supp. 253 · District Court, S.D. California · Aug 1, 1963

The State Department of Employment and the Board of Equalization both made appearances through the same Deputy Attorney General. … Laffoon v.

First Nat. Ben. Soc. v. Garrison

58 F. Supp. 972 · District Court, S.D. California · Jan 16, 1945

Chief Justice Taney, 578 -586; Cooley v. Board of Wardens, 12 How. 299, 318-321 , 13 L.Ed. 996 ; Kelly v. Washington, 302 U.S. 1, 9-10 , 58 S.Ct. 87 , 82 L.Ed. 3 . Cf. Sturges v. … Webster County, 1879, 101 U.S. 773 , 25 L.Ed. 925 ; Board of Liquidation v.

Aguilera-Flores v. Landon

125 F. Supp. 55 · District Court, S.D. California · Sep 22, 1954

Issued an order of deportation directing that he (Flores) be deported from the United States to Mexico on the ground that he became a member of the Communist Party after entry into the United States; that upon appeal to the Board … of Immigration Appeals, the Board dismissed the appeal and he has ■exhausted his administrative remedies.

In re Pac. Mar. Freight, Inc.

316 F. Supp. 3d 1214 · District Court, S.D. California · Jun 21, 2018

BACKGROUND On or about August 14, 2016, a fire broke out on board the M/V Chief (the "vessel") while it was moored alongside the PTS pier in San Diego Bay. See Doc. No. 1 ¶ 2, 8. Henry Wimbley, Jr. … Co. v. United States , 728 F.3d 839 , 842 (8th Cir. 2013). 3.

First Nat. Ben. Soc. v. Garrison

58 F. Supp. 972 · District Court, S.D. California · Jan 16, 1945

Chief Justice Taney, 578 -586; Cooley v. Board of Wardens, 12 How. 299, 318-321 , 13 L.Ed. 996 ; Kelly v. Washington, 302 U.S. 1, 9-10 , 58 S.Ct. 87 , 82 L.Ed. 3 . Cf. Sturges v. … Webster County, 1879, 101 U.S. 773 , 25 L.Ed. 925 ; Board of Liquidation v.

United States v. King

335 F. Supp. 523 · District Court, S.D. California · Nov 23, 1971

In United States v. … Crawley v.

Maddux v. Grey

43 F.2d 441 · District Court, S.D. California · Sep 5, 1930

Plaintiff, as assignee of Alice V. Sebmidt, formerly the widow and the only heir of John R. … Brown v. Baxter, 77 Kan. 97 , 94 P. 155, 574 . The assignment of the copyright, together with the right to sue for damages for infringement, seems to be vested in plaintiff by an instrument sufficient for that purpose.

HP COMMUNICATIONS, INC. v. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, and DOES 1-20

District Court, S.D. California · Feb 23, 2026

LLC v. … N.A., Inc. v.

Melekov v. Collins

30 F. Supp. 159 · District Court, S.D. California · Nov 9, 1939

Railroad Labor Board, 268 U.S. 619 , 45 S.Ct. 621 , 69 L.Ed. 1119 ; Munter v. … In Sewchulis v.

Borrego Community Health Foundation v. Inland Valley Investments, LLC

District Court, S.D. California · Mar 21, 2024

This was achieved by “Borrego Insiders” (certain 13 employees and Board members at BCHF) entering and concealing these leases from the 14 full Board of Trustees. Id. … Brown, 75 F.3d 18 506, 510 (9th Cir. 1996)). 19 In Reves v. Ernst & Young, the U.S.

Peralta v. Massachusetts State Police

District Court, S.D. California · Jan 12, 2023

See Brown v. Butler, No. D075348, 2020 WL 2530086, at *6 (Cal. Ct. … See Rosati v.

Laskowitz v. Marie Designer, Inc.

119 F. Supp. 541 · District Court, S.D. California · Feb 23, 1954

“In patent nomenclature what the infringer makes is ‘profits,’ what the owner of the patent loses by such infringement is ‘damages.’ ” Diamond Stone-Sawing Machine Co. v. Brown, 2 Cir., 1908, 166 F. 306 . … Appropriate are the words of the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Diamond Stone-Sawing Machine Co. v. Brown, supra, Note 37, 166 F. at page 308 : . "An infringer is not an outlaio.

United States v. Jotham Bixby Co.

55 F.2d 317 · District Court, S.D. California · Jan 11, 1932

The defendants include the city of Los Angeles, its board of park commissioners, and its board of library commissioners, and, in addition, a large number of individuals who are the heirs of the original owners of a tract … App. 69 , 268 P. 388 ; Slavich v. Hamilton, 201 Cal. 299 , 257 P. 60 ; Hall v. Fairchild-Wilton Co., 66 Cal. App. 615 , 227 P. 649 ; Mulvey v. Wangenheim, 23 Cal. App. 268 , 137 P. 1106 ; and Church v.