Case law

Even v. Clifford

287 F. Supp. 334 · District Court, S.D. California · Jul 25, 1968

In United States v. Lonstein, 370 F.2d 318 (2d Cir., 1966) the court described the Local Draft Board’s function while inducting a delinquent reservist as solely ministerial. … Brown v. McNamara, 263 F. Supp. 686 (D.N.J., 1967), affirmed 387 F.2d 150 (3rd Cir., 1967), Cert. denied Brown v. Clifford, 390 U.S. 1005 , 88 S.Ct. 1244 , 20 L.Ed.2d 105 (April 2, 1968); Chavez v.

Brown v. Acutus Medical, Inc.

District Court, S.D. California · Jul 19, 2022

Huene v. … Jeffry Brown v. Acutus Medical, Inc., et al., No. 22-cv-206, and Clinton A. 7 Ferguson v.

Beverly Hills Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board

33 F.R.D. 292 · District Court, S.D. California · Aug 21, 1962

Robert De Mario Jewelers, 361 U.S. 288 , 80 S.Ct. 332 , 4 L.Ed.2d 323 (1960); Los Angeles Trust Deed & Mortgage Exchange v. S.E.C., 285 F.2d 162, 181-182 (9th Cir., 1960); S. E. C. v. H. S. … . & Loan Ass’n v. Cleary, 296 U.S. 315 , 56 S.Ct. 235 , 80 L.Ed. 251 (1935); Massachusetts v. Mellon, 262 U.S. 447 , 43 S.Ct. 597 , 67 L.Ed. 1078 (1922); State of Minnesota ex rel. Lord v.

FEDERAL EMPLOYEES'DISTRIBUTING COMPANY v. United States

206 F. Supp. 330 · District Court, S.D. California · Jun 12, 1962

[Cf.: Brown Shoe Co. v. Commissioner, supra, 339 U.S. at 591 , 70 S.Ct. at 94 L.Ed. 1081; Community T.V. Ass’n v. United States, 203 F.Supp. 270, 272-274 (D.Mont.1962).] … In Brown Shoe Co. v. Commissioner, supra, 339 U.S. 583 , 70 S.Ct. 820 , 94 L.

United States v. Monroe

150 F. Supp. 785 · District Court, S.D. California · Apr 16, 1957

United States v. … Compare United States v. Schoebel, 7 Cir., 1953, 201 F.2d 31 with United States v. Brown, D.C.N.J.1955, 129 F.Supp. 237 . 18 . See United States v. Schoebel, 7 Cir., 1953, 201 F.2d 31 ; Lehr v.

In re Packaged Seafood Prods. Antitrust Litig.

338 F. Supp. 3d 1118 · District Court, S.D. California · Sep 5, 2018

(Brown Decl. ¶ 4.) … Brown has declared, Big Catch does not hold its own board meetings, *1167 has no offices, and no employees. (Brown Decl. ¶¶ 21-22.)

Brown v. Camp Pendleton & Quantico Housing, LLC

District Court, S.D. California · Mar 25, 2025

Brown Decl. 12 ¶ 9. Mr. Brown then lists five documents, but once again does not attach them to the 13 declaration. Mr. … Servs., Ltd. v.

Brown v. Camp Pendleton & Quantico Housing, LLC

District Court, S.D. California · Mar 21, 2025

Touhy v. … Adams v.

Doe v. San Diego Unified School District

District Court, S.D. California · Nov 18, 2021

Lujan v. … Prince 15 v.

Brown v. Sweetwater Union High School District

District Court, S.D. California · Feb 18, 2025

In Wood v. Strickland, 420 U.S. 320 (1975), the Supreme Court 12 rejected an argument by school board members that they were entitled to absolute 13 immunity. Id. at 314, 322. … The board, however, was not entitled to legislative immunity in denying plaintiff’s 10 “request to postpone his retirement date.” Id.; see also Williams v.

Kennedy v. Los Angeles Joint Executive Board of Hotel & Restaurant Employees & Bartenders Unions

192 F. Supp. 339 · District Court, S.D. California · Feb 27, 1961

Hecht Company v. Bowles, 1944, 321 U.S. 321, 331 , 64 S.Ct. 587, 592 , 88 L.Ed. 754 . See, Porter v. Warner Holding Co., 1946, 328 U.S. 395, 397-399 , 66 S.Ct. 1086 , 90 L.Ed. 1332 . And see, Brown ex rel. N.L.R.B. v. … Burke of the Northern District *343 of California in Brown for and on Behalf of N. L. R. B. v.

Arenas v. United States

140 F. Supp. 606 · District Court, S.D. California · Apr 27, 1956

Upon the death of Eleuteria in 1954, her surviving son, Richard Brown Arenas, was declared pursuant to 25 U.S.C.A. § 372 to have inherited his mother’s interest in Guadalupe’s allotment. … . § 348 ; Board of Commissioners of Creek County, Okl. v. Seber, 1943, 318 U.S. 705, 716-717 , 63 S.Ct. 920 , 87 L.Ed. 1094 ; Heckman v. United States, 1912, 224 U.S. 413 , 32 S.Ct. 424 , 56 L.Ed. 820 ; United States v.

Burnett v. Dugan

618 F. Supp. 2d 1232 · District Court, S.D. California · May 6, 2009

O’Shea v. Littleton, 414 U.S. 488, 500, 501 , 94 S.Ct. 669 , 38 L.Ed.2d 674 (1974); see also Armstrong v. Davis, 275 F.3d 849, 872 (9th Cir.2001). … V.

Santa Margarita Mutual Water Co. v. State Water Rights Board of California

165 F. Supp. 870 · District Court, S.D. California · Aug 8, 1958

Laisne v. State Board of Optometry, 1942, 19 Cal.2d 831, 845 , 123 P.2d 457 , is cited to this effect. … Board and objected to the jurisdiction of that Board. Thus, the United States initiated the proceedings on application No. 12576, which were set for hearing before the State Water Rights Board in August 1957.

Rastin v. Laird

320 F. Supp. 1047 · District Court, S.D. California · Dec 29, 1970

Kanewske v. Nitze, 383 F.2d 388 (9th Cir., 1967); Brown v. McNamara, 263 F.Supp. 686 (D.N.J., 1967), affirmed 387 F.2d 150 (1967), cert. denied, Brown v. Clifford, 390 U.S. 1005 , 88 S.Ct. 1244 , 20 L.Ed.2d 105 (1968). … Brown v. McNamara, supra at 691 .

Brown v. Nano Hearing Tech Opco, LLC

District Court, S.D. California · Jul 9, 2024

Brown v. Hain Celestial Grp., Inc., 913 F. 21 Supp. 2d 881, 888 (N.D. … Bates v.

Carranza v. Edmund G. Brown, Jr.

District Court, S.D. California · Feb 7, 2023

See Maness v. … Harris v. United States, 382 U.S. 19 162, 164–65 (1965); United States v.

Lebaron v. Printing Specialties & Paper Converters Union, Local 388

75 F. Supp. 678 · District Court, S.D. California · Feb 3, 1948

Switchmen’s Union v. National Mediation Board, 320 U.S. 297 , 64 S.Ct. 95 , 88 L.Ed. 61 ; Endicott Johnson Corp. v. Perkins, 317 U.S. 501, 510 , 63 S.Ct. 339 , 87 L.Ed. 424 ; United States v. … National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp., 301 U.S. 1, 46 , 57 S.Ct. 615 , 81 L.Ed. 893 , 108 A.L.R. 1352 .

Zubkis v. Lange

966 F. Supp. 985 · District Court, S.D. California · Mar 14, 1997

complaint without prejudice and with leave to amend because Plaintiff had failed to make a sufficient showing on any of the four factors to be considered for the court’s exercise of equitable jurisdiction under Ramsden v. … Therefore, the court dismisses individual Defendants Lange and Brown and substitutes the United States as defendant.

Brown v. Bank of America, N.A.

District Court, S.D. California · Oct 26, 2020

City of Chicago v. … (footnote omitted)); Ove v.