Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscasd

3,618 results

1.40s

  • Stanislaus

    District Court, S.D. California · Apr 7, 2026

    Foman v. … Res., Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United States v. Savchenko

    201 F.R.D. 503 · District Court, S.D. California · May 18, 2001

    On April 28, 2001, a United States Navy ship on routine patrol 500 nautical miles off the coast of Acapulco, Mexico, conducted a boarding of a Belizian fishing vessel, the “SVESDA MARU”. … In United States v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Dubil v. Rayford Camp & Co.

    86 F. Supp. 570 · District Court, S.D. California · May 23, 1949

    Tucker v. Spalding, 13 Wall. 453 , 80 U.S. 453 , 20 L.Ed. 515 ; Merrill v. Yeomans, 94 U.S. 568, 573 , 24 L. Ed. 235 ; Standard. Oil Co. of California, v. … Co. v. E. C. Brown Co., 6 Cir., 124 F.2d 426, 428 ; Warner Bros. Co. v. American Lady Corset Co., 2 Cir., 136 F.2d 93 .

    Modified by Dubil v. Rayford Camp & Co., 184 F.2d 899 (1950)Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Colvin v. United States

    175 F. Supp. 877 · District Court, S.D. California · Sep 2, 1959

    In 1955 the Board of Directors voted to redeem 70 shares, or 20%, of the outstanding preferred stock. Redemption was by lot. Plaintiffs’ five shares of preferred stock were redeemed. … Rev., 1957, 247 F.2d 156 and Pacific Vegetable Oil Corp. v. Com’r Int.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Abada v. Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.

    68 F. Supp. 2d 1160 · District Court, S.D. California · Sep 7, 1999

    See Franchise Tax Board of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal., 463 U.S. 1, 10 , 103 S.Ct. 2841 , 77 L.Ed.2d 420 (1983). … Id. at 393, 107 S.Ct. 2425 (italics in original) (citing Franchise Tax Board of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal., 463 U.S. at 12 , 103 S.Ct. 2841 .)

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Harmon v. San Diego County

    477 F. Supp. 1084 · District Court, S.D. California · Sep 13, 1979

    Board of Trustees of Keene State College v. Sweeney, 439 U.S. 24 , 99 S.Ct. 295 , 58 L.Ed.2d 216 (1978); Furnco Constr. Corp. v. Waters, 438 U.S. 567, 577-78 , 98 S.Ct. 2943 , 57 L.Ed.2d 957 (1978). … See Board of Trustees of Keene State College v. Sweeney, 439 U.S. 24 , 99 S.Ct. 295 , 58 L.Ed.2d 216 (1978); Fumco Constr. Corp. v. Waters, 438 U.S. 567 , 98 S.Ct. 2943 , 57 L.Ed.2d 957 (1978); McDonald v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • United States v. Alvarado-Soto

    120 F. Supp. 848 · District Court, S.D. California · Apr 21, 1954

    Garner v. Los Angeles Board of Education, 1951, 341 U.S. 716 , 71 S.Ct. 909 , 95 L.Ed. 1317 ; United States Constitution Art. 1 § 9. … Samuels v. McCurdy, 1925, 267 U.S. 188 , 45 S.Ct. 264 , 69 L.Ed. 568 .

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • United States v. Coffman

    50 F. Supp. 823 · District Court, S.D. California · Jul 6, 1943

    Some of the seized documents were copies of letters written to the Selective Service Board and of telegrams sent to Lloyd Coffman, his nephew, one of the reg'.strants whom he charged with aiding to evade service. … The named arresting officer, at the hearing before me, in answer to a question as to the nature of the articles seized, after referring to the ranch records and the letters to the Selective Service Board, and telegrams to

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Clarke v. Welch

    46 F.2d 563 · District Court, S.D. California · Nov 19, 1930

    Swenson v. Commissioner, 14 B. T. A. 675. And see Ault, etc., v. Commissioner, 17 B. T. A. 665; Ott v. Commissioner, 15 B. T. A. 867. … Phillips v. U. S. (D. C.) 12 F.(2d) 598 ; Heiner v. Crosby (C. C. A.) 24 F.(2d) 191 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Los Angeles Shipbuilding & Drydock Corp. v. United States

    166 F. Supp. 914 · District Court, S.D. California · Oct 6, 1958

    The Board of Tax Appeals in Moock Electric Supply Co. v. C. I. … In Texas City Terminal Railway Co. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Fundingsland v. OMH Healthedge Holdings, Inc.

    329 F. Supp. 3d 1123 · District Court, S.D. California · Jul 18, 2018

    After talking with the other members of the board, Drislane responded on October 8, 2012, stating: The Board is willing to extend the execution period for 1/3 of the original number of your options (90), since you worked … On August 30, 2013, OMH's Board of Directors terminated the Stock Plan. (JSUF ¶ 23.)

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Loritz v. CMT BLUES

    271 F. Supp. 2d 1252 · District Court, S.D. California · Jul 14, 2003

    Yeager’s Fuel, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Power & Light Co., 162 F.R.D. 482, 489 (E.D.Pa.1995); Brown v. City of Oneonta, 916 F.Supp. 176, 180 (N.D.N.Y.1996). … In Bobolakis v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Hill v. Shaffer

    District Court, S.D. California · Oct 22, 2024

    .”); Nelson v. Brown, No. 11-CV- 19 2202-GPC WVG, 2014 WL 1096189, at *8 (S.D. Cal. … Brown, No. 11-CV- 2202-GPC WVG, 2014 WL 1096189, at *3 (S.D. Cal.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Redlands Foothill Groves v. Jacobs

    30 F. Supp. 995 · District Court, S.D. California · Jan 5, 1940

    See United States v. Corrick, 1936, 298 U.S. 435 , 56 S.Ct. 829 , 80 L.Ed. 1263 ; National Labor Relations Board v. … Co. v. Board of Com’rs of Weld County, 1918, 247 U.S. 282, 287 , 38 S.Ct. 510 , 62 L.Ed. 1110 ; Grosjean v. American Press Co., 1936, 297 U.S. 233, 242 , 56 S.Ct. 444 , 80 L.Ed. 660 ; American Life Ins. Co. v.

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Williams v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.

    14 F.R.D. 1 · District Court, S.D. California · Mar 5, 1953

    Swan, 1884, 111 U.S. 379, 382 , 4 S.Ct. 510 , 28 L.Ed. 462 ; State of Rhode Island v. Com. of Massachusetts, 1838, 12 Pet. 657 , 37 U.S. 657, 720 , 9 L.Ed. 1233 ; Brown v. … Co. v. Shoshone Min. Co., 9 Cir., 1901, 109 F. 504, 507 ; cf. National Labor Relations Board v. Denver Bldg. Council, 1951, 341 U.S. 675, 681-683 , 71 S. Ct. 943 , 95 L.Ed. 1284 ; Sacks v.

    Cited 49 timesPublished
  • Federal Home Loan Bank v. Long Beach Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

    122 F. Supp. 960 · District Court, S.D. California · Sep 16, 1954

    V. Ammann; Home Loan Bank Board, et al., Cross-defendants. 1. Findings of Fact, 2. Conclusions of Law, and *961 3. … V. Ammann, Home Loan Bank Board, et al., Cross-defendants. Civil Action No. 13979-P.H.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Ex Parte Kurth

    28 F. Supp. 258 · District Court, S.D. California · Oct 2, 1939

    Alpher with the Department of Labor, while the order of the Board was before them, no such contention was made. … Turner v. Williams, 1904, 194 U.S. 279 , 24 S.Ct. 719 , 48 L.Ed. 979 ; Nicoli v. Briggs, 10 Cir.1936, 83 F.2d 375 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Penn Mut. Life Ins. v. Fields

    81 F. Supp. 54 · District Court, S.D. California · Nov 24, 1948

    Proof of the voting is supplied by one of the election officials who has been a member of the local Election Board since 1930. This is confirmed by Vargo, who produced an autograph book in which W. C. … This conclusion is consistent with his assertion in the petition before the Board of "Tax Appeals in which California domicile is alleged for a four-year period beginning 1933.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • United States v. Sanders

    District Court, S.D. California · Sep 27, 2023

    Ashcroft v. … Papasan v. Allain, 478 U.S. 265, 286 (1986); Sprewell v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Atlas v. Accredited Home Lenders Holding Co.

    556 F. Supp. 2d 1142 · District Court, S.D. California · Jan 4, 2008

    Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, — U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 1955, 1965 , 167 L.Ed.2d 929 (2007); see Kennedy v. … Ronconi v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.