Case law

In Re Wireless Facilities, Inc. Derivative Litigation

562 F. Supp. 2d 1098 · District Court, S.D. California · Feb 26, 2008

Gator.com Corp. v. L.L. Bean, Inc., 341 F.3d 1072, 1075-76 (9th Cir.2003) (quoting AT. & T. v. Com pagnie Bruxelles Lambert, 94 F.3d 586 , 588 (9th Cir.1996)); see also Doe v. … public statements, among other things, and attended board and committee meetings in person and by telephone in California.

United States v. McGill

718 F. Supp. 2d 1240 · District Court, S.D. California · Mar 16, 2010

United States v. … United States v.

Neal

District Court, S.D. California · Nov 12, 2025

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 21 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. … Manlove v. County 4 of San Diego, 759 F. Supp. 3d 1057, 1068 (S.D. Cal. 2024) (internal quotation marks 5 omitted) (citing Bd. of Cnty. Comm’rs of Bryan Cnty., Okl. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397 407 6 (1997).

United States v. Horne

109 F. Supp. 935 · District Court, S.D. California · Feb 6, 1953

Frost v. Commissioner, 23 B.T.A. 411 ; Locser v. Commissioner, 27 B.T.A. 601 . In the latter case other previous cases by the Board of Tax Appeals to the same effect are cited. The Second Circuit, in Greylock Mills v. … See Myers v. De Mier, 52 N.Y. 647 ; Scudder v. Lehman, 142 App.Div. 631 , 127 N.Y.S. 470 ; Brode v. Rosendale Terrace Co., 216 N.Y. 246, 250 , 110 N.E. 430 ; Boston & Worcester St. Ry. Co. v.

Ex parte Harumi Motoshige

6 F. Supp. 792 · District Court, S.D. California · May 4, 1934

This letter was not shown to petitioner nor his counsel, but was considered by the Board of Review in their further consideration of the ease. The Board recommended deportation, and warrant was accordingly issued. … Tod v. Waldman et al., 266 U. S. 113 , 45 S. Ct. 85 , 69 L. Ed. 195 ; White v. Wong Quen Luck (C. C. A.) 243 F. 547 . It is so ordered. Exception to injured parties.

Industrial Truck Ass'n, Inc. v. Henry

909 F. Supp. 1368 · District Court, S.D. California · Jun 21, 1995

California Labor Fed’n v. … In Gade v.

Droz v. County of San Diego

District Court, S.D. California · May 20, 2020

Com’rs of Bryan Cnty., Okl. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 3 403 (1997) (referencing Monell, 436 U.S. at 689–92). … (quoting Board of County Commissioners v.

In Re Remec Incorporated Securities Litigation

702 F. Supp. 2d 1202 · District Court, S.D. California · Apr 21, 2010

Vucinich v. … Trust v.

Barto v. Miyashiro

District Court, S.D. California · Apr 6, 2020

Coalition to Defend 24 Affirmative Action v. Brown, 674 F.3d 1128, 1134 (9th Cir. 2012); see Ex parte Young, 209 25 U.S. 123, 155-56 (1908)). … Doe v.

Henderson v. Bryan

46 F. Supp. 682 · District Court, S.D. California · Aug 20, 1942

Co. v. … In Highland v.

United States ex rel. Ferguson Door Co. v. Safeco Insurance

707 F. Supp. 1205 · District Court, S.D. California · Feb 22, 1989

. § 601 , et seq., to either the Armed Services Board or the Claims Court. … Bedoni v. Navajo-Hopi Indian Relocation Commission, 854 F.2d 321, 325 (9th Cir.1988).

United States v. Local 36 of International Fishermen & Allied Workers

70 F. Supp. 782 · District Court, S.D. California · Mar 12, 1947

Hayes v. Missouri, 1887, 120 U.S. 68 , 7 S.Ct. 350 , 30 L.Ed. 578 ; Spies v. Illinois, 1887, 123 U.S. 131 , 8 S.Ct. 22 , 31 L.Ed. 80 ; Brown v. New Jersey, 1899, 175 U.S. 172 , 20 S.Ct. 77 , 44 L.Ed. 119 ; Howard v. … In United States v.

Lindland v. TuSimple, Inc.

District Court, S.D. California · Jul 26, 2023

See Matsumaru 2 v. Sato, 521 F. Supp. 2d 1013, 1016 (D. Ariz. 2007); see also Chambers v. NASCO, Inc. 3 501 U.S. 32, 45-46 (1991); Leon v. IDX Sys. … “Reasonableness is the benchmark for sanctions based on attorneys’ fees.” 6 Mirch v. Frank, 266 Fed. App’x 586, 588 (9th Cir. 2008) (citing Brown v. Baden (In re 7 Yagman), 796 F.2d 1165, 1184-85 (9th Cir. 1986)).

Associated Tel. Co. v. Communication Workers

114 F. Supp. 334 · District Court, S.D. California · Jul 21, 1953

C.A. §§ 101-115, 3 or (b) that the matter *338 in dispute was an “unfair labor practice” within the exclusive jurisdiction of the National Labor Relations Board under the Taft-Hartley Act, 61 Stat. 136 (1947), 29 U.S.C.A. … The remaining cases concern conflicts between jurisdiction of the Federal Board created for the handling of labor disputes and State Boards created by state statute for similar purposes.

Oliver v. IN-N-Out Burgers

945 F. Supp. 2d 1126 · District Court, S.D. California · May 10, 2013

Teichert & Son, 127 F.3d 1150, 1154 (9th Cir.1997); accord Brown v. Lucky Stores, 246 F.3d 1182, 1190 (9th Cir.2001). On March 26, 2013, the Court dismissed the action for lack of standing. (Doc. No. 68.) … See Brown v. Desert Christian Center, 193 Cal.App.4th 733, 740 , 122 Cal.Rptr.3d 590 (2011); State of Cal. ex rel. Standard Elevator Co., Inc. v.

A. T. Jergins Trust v. Rogan

40 F. Supp. 40 · District Court, S.D. California · Jul 19, 1941

On January 14, 1926, the Board of Trustees adopted a resolution reading: “Resolved, that the A. T. … West Bay City Sugar Co. v.

Toranto v. Jaffurs

297 F. Supp. 3d 1073 · District Court, S.D. California · Mar 20, 2018

National Collegiate Athletic Association v. Board of Regents of Univ. of Oklahoma , 468 U.S. 85 , 100, 104 S.Ct. 2948 , 82 L.Ed.2d 70 (1984). Restraint is presumed unreasonable for practices subject to the per se rule. … Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294 , 366, 82 S.Ct. 1502 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962). These determinations are factual in nature and are better tested by a summary judgment motion or at trial.

Baker v. City of San Diego

District Court, S.D. California · Jun 1, 2020

See Brown v. Elec. … See Inestra v. Cliff Warren Invs., Inc., 886 F. Supp. 2d 1161, 1169 (C.D. Cal. 2012) 23 (citing Brown v. Smith, 55 Cal. App. 4th 767, 780 (1997)).

Baldauf v. Nitze

261 F. Supp. 167 · District Court, S.D. California · Nov 3, 1966

Reed v. Franke, 297 F.2d 17, 20 (4th Cir. 1961). … Boske v. Comingore, 177 U.S. 459, 470 , 20 S.Ct. 701 , 44 L.Ed. 846 (1900); Reed v. Franke, 297 F.2d 17 , 25 (1961), supra; Edwards v. Madigan, 281 F.2d 73 (9th Cir. 1960).

City of San Diego v. Monsanto Co.

310 F. Supp. 3d 1057 · District Court, S.D. California · Apr 17, 2018

See Abelleira [ v. … Puga v.