Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscasd

3,618 results

1.12s

  • Malibu Lakeside Mut. Water Co. v. United States

    97 F. Supp. 542 · District Court, S.D. California · Feb 19, 1951

    V Plaintiff’s by-laws provided the usual provisions for a mutual water company with the usual officers and board of directors except that in article X, provisions were made for the civic center and recreational facilities … During the taxable years involved, there was an entertainment committee, the- chairman of which was annually appointed by the board of directors of plaintiff.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Leon v. County of San Diego

    115 F. Supp. 2d 1197 · District Court, S.D. California · Sep 9, 2000

    Weiner v. … See, e.g., Von Colln v. County of Ventura, 189 F.R.D. 583, 601 (C.D.Cal.1999). Therefore, the board of supervisors appears to retain supervisory power over the sheriffs daily operation of the county jail. 3.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Foster

    District Court, S.D. California · Feb 24, 2026

    THIRD JOINT MOTION TO EXTEND DATES OF FACTUAL 14 BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE … Johnson v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Rhoades v. United States

    216 F. Supp. 732 · District Court, S.D. California · Nov 20, 1962

    Co. (9 Cir., 1961) 294 F.2d 179 , cert. granted 369 U.S. 810 , 82 S.Ct. 688 , 7 L.Ed.2d 611 ; Drumgoole v. Virginia Elec. & Power Company (E.D.Va. 1959) 170 F.Supp. 824 ; Christie v. Powder Power Tool Corp. … (D.C.D.C. 1954) 124 F.Supp. 693 ; Brown & Root, Inc. v. United States (S.D.Tex.1950) 92 F.Supp. 257, 265 , aff’d 198 F.2d 138 (5 Cir., 1952); 13 Am.Jur., Contribution §§ 51 and 52.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Taxel v. Electronic Sports Research (In Re Cinematronics, Inc.)

    111 B.R. 902 · District Court, S.D. California · Mar 14, 1990

    Terry v. Proehl (In re Proehl), 36 B.R. 86, 87 (W.D.Va.1984); see also Hoffman v. … Brown (In re Brown), 56 B.R. 487, 488 (Bankr.D.Md.1985) (“The Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978, ... which expressly authorized bankruptcy courts to conduct jury trials ..., was declared invalid as an unconstitutional delegation

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Holmes v. Atlas Garage Door Co.

    63 F. Supp. 692 · District Court, S.D. California · Dec 26, 1945

    Obear-Nester Glass Co., 8 Cir., 1938, 95 F.2d 414 ; Gotts-chalk Manufacturing Co. v. Springfield Wire & Tinsel Co., 1 Cir., 1937, 90 F.2d 468 ; and see: National Labor Relations Board v. M. … Lowenstein & Sons, Inc., 2 Cir., 1941, 121 F.2d 673 ; National Labor Relations Board v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Welker v. Law Office of Horwitz

    626 F. Supp. 2d 1068 · District Court, S.D. California · Jun 16, 2009

    Brown Electrical Contractor, Inc. v. Rhino Elec. Supply, Inc., 137 Cal.App.4th 1118, 1124 , 41 Cal.Rptr.3d 1 (2006). … Rouse v. Law Offices of Rory Clark, 465 F.Supp.2d 1031, 1038 (S.D.Cal.2006) Other courts have denied anti-SLAPP motions after finding routine debt collection practices are not protected activities. In A.F. Brown Elec.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Beltran v. State of Cal.

    617 F. Supp. 948 · District Court, S.D. California · Sep 19, 1985

    Warren City School District Board of Education, 465 U.S. 75 , 104 S.Ct. 892, 896-98 , 79 L.Ed.2d 56 (1984), to federal actions brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 . See also Trujillo v. … Although in some instances findings of an administrative board may be accorded res judicata effect, see, e.g., People v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • United States v. City of San Diego

    18 F. Supp. 2d 1090 · District Court, S.D. California · Sep 17, 1998

    In Davis v. … In Friend v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Rozelle v. Quinn

    47 F. Supp. 740 · District Court, S.D. California · Nov 23, 1942

    Joseph, Missouri, and was discharged from draft November 12, 1918, at place of his local board by reason of cancellation of the draft.” … McQuillen v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Medimpact Healthcare Systems, Inc. v. IQVIA Holdings Inc.

    District Court, S.D. California · May 26, 2022

    The litigation hold issued in connection with MedImpact 5 International LLC, et al. v. … See Kamakana v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Cornwell v. Joseph

    7 F. Supp. 2d 1106 · District Court, S.D. California · Jun 19, 1998

    That order and a more complete description of this case are found at Cornwell v. California Board of Barbering and Cosmetology, 962 F.Supp. 1260 (S.D.Cal.1997). … The order dismissed the complaint as to the seven board members of the now-defunct CBBC.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • United States v. Aviles

    222 F. 474 · District Court, S.D. California · Apr 27, 1915

    Brown v. Elliott, 225 U. S. 392, 401 , 32 Sup. Ct. 812, 56 L. Ed. 1136 . … S. v. McKinley et al. (C. C.) 127 Fed. 169 .

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • In re Western States Building-Loan Ass'n

    50 F.2d 632 · District Court, S.D. California · Jun 5, 1931

    See, also, Collier on Bankruptcy (13th Ed.) volume 2, p. 1409, on Anticipatory Breach; Williams v. U. S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 236 U. S. 549 , 35 S. Ct. 289 , 59 L. Ed. 713 ; Maynard v. … Central Trust Company v. Chicago Auditorium, supra.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • MacMillan v. Montecito Country Club, Inc.

    65 F. Supp. 240 · District Court, S.D. California · Mar 29, 1946

    The petitioner was employed after a conference with the Board of Directors of the Club. … Above all, his work had to be satisfactory to the members of the Club and, consequently, to the Board of Directors, who retained the right of discharging him at any time.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Ollier v. Sweetwater Union High School District

    604 F. Supp. 2d 1264 · District Court, S.D. California · Mar 30, 2009

    Cohen v. Brown University, 991 F.2d 888, 897-98 (1st Cir.1993)(Cohen I); accord Roberts v. Colorado State Bd. of Agriculture, 998 F.2d 824 , 829 (10th Cir. 1993). … See Investigator’s Manual at 27; Cohen III v. Brown University, 879 F.Supp. 185 , 210 n. 51 (D.R.I.1995).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Herta

    District Court, S.D. California · Jul 27, 2026

    or registrant of the Board. … Sept. 28, 2023)); accord Brown v. 24 Dep’t of Just., No. C098572, 2024 WL 3082230, at *4 (Cal. Ct. App. June 21, 2024) 25 (unpublished). Plaintiff’s second cause of action is therefore dismissed. 26 C.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Package & Utility Drivers, Local No. 396 v. Hearst Publishing Co.

    206 F. Supp. 594 · District Court, S.D. California · Jul 6, 1962

    The ease of Textile Workers Union of America v. … In Steelworkers v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Rojas-Gutierrez v. Hoy

    161 F. Supp. 448 · District Court, S.D. California · Apr 25, 1958

    The Board of Immigration Appeals affirmed the order of deportation. … Shomberg v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • In Re Imperial Irr. Dist.

    10 F. Supp. 832 · District Court, S.D. California · May 2, 1935

    Selby v. Oakdale Irrigation District, 140 Cal. App. 171 , 35 P.(2d) 125; Hershey v. Cole, 130 Cal. App. 683, 687 , 20 P.(2d) 972; St. Louis Union Trust Co. v. Franklyn-American Trust Co. (8 C. C. … R. 386; Rorick v. Board of Com’rs of Everglades Drainage District (3-judge case, D. C. Fla.) 57 F.(2d) 1048 . Compare the recent California Supreme Court decision in County of Los Angeles v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.