Case law

Wilcox v. Emmons

67 F. Supp. 339 · District Court, S.D. California · Jul 29, 1946

V-7 “Subject: G-2 Memorandum ‘Mankind United’ “dated November 21, 1942. “To: Assistant Chief of Staff. CAD. “1. The Individual Exclusion Hearing Board heard the case of Homer G. Wilcox, Case No. … Crowell v. McFadon, 1814, 8 Cranch 93 , 3 L.Ed. 499 ; Martin v. Mott, 1827, 12 Wheat. 19 , 6 L.Ed. 537 ; Luther v. Borden, 1849, 7 How. 1 , 12 L.Ed. 581 ; Spalding v.

Dym v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance

19 F. Supp. 2d 1147 · District Court, S.D. California · Jun 30, 1998

Co. v. Superior Court of Santa Clara County, 51 Cal.3d 807, 822 , 274 Cal.Rptr. 820, 831 , 799 P.2d 1253 (1990); Republic Indem. Co. v. … Co. v. Superior Court of Santa Clara, 51 Cal.3d 807, 822 , 274 Cal.Rptr. 820, 831 , 799 P.2d 1253 (1990); Republic Indem. Co. v.

In re Katsujiro Akiyama

58 F.2d 363 · District Court, S.D. California · Apr 12, 1932

An appeal was taken to the Secretary of Labor, who sustained the decision of the board of special inquiry and ordered deportation. … Since, if the husband is entitled to re-enter as a trade treaty alien, the wife possesses the same right (Cheung Sum Shee v. Nagle, 268 U. S. 336 , 45 S. Ct. 539 , 69 L.

Smith v. Sperling

117 F. Supp. 781 · District Court, S.D. California · Dec 16, 1953

State of Rhode Island v. Massachusetts, 1838, 12 Pet. 657 , 37 U.S. 657, 720 , 9 L.Ed. 1233 ; Brown v. Keene, 1834, 8 Pet. 112 , 33 U.S. 112 , 8 L.Ed. 885 ; Capron v. … Recalling that in Doctor v. Harrington, supra, where the stockholders’ bill of complaint alleged that the “board of directors * * * is under the absolute control and domination of * * * John J.

United States v. Certain Parcels of Land in Riverside County

67 F. Supp. 780 · District Court, S.D. California · Jun 27, 1946

Norton v. … See also Leonard v. Osburn, 169 Cal. 157 , 146 P. 530, 532 ; Hall v. Bartlett, 158 Cal. 638 , 112 P. 176 ; Helm v. Wilson, 76 Cal. 476 , 18 P. 604 ; Irving v. Cunningham, 66 Cal. 15 , 4 P. 766 ; McKeon v.

Ross v. Ross

79 F. Supp. 716 · District Court, S.D. California · Jun 25, 1948

Wells v. Stout, 9 Cal. 479 ; Gump v. Gump, 42 Cal.App.2d 64 , 108 P.2d 21 ; Brown v. Brown, 170 Cal. 1 , 147 P. 1168 . The letters of the .plaintiff himself to Mrs. … See Estin v. Estin; Kreiger v. Kreiger; Sherrer v. Sherrer, and Coe v. Coe, supra, Petry v. Petry, 47 Cal.App. 2d 594 , 118 P.2d 498 ; Greenfield v. Mather, 32 Cal.2d-, 194 P.2d 1 .

Farmers & Merchants Bank v. United States

125 F. Supp. 587 · District Court, S.D. California · Oct 28, 1954

Hughes, the Board of Tax Appeals decision and the 9th Circuit federal court decision in the case of Hughes v. … Hughes, relative to the alleged gift tax deficiencies *593 for 1936, the petition filed in said Board of Tax Appeals ease, the reported decision in the case of Hughes v.

Club Gaona, Inc. v. United States

167 F. Supp. 741 · District Court, S.D. California · Nov 10, 1958

No mortgage to the Club or to its Executive Board was executed to secure the loan, although the loan was later approved by the membership. … In Lloyd v. C. I.

ICR Graduate School v. Honig

758 F. Supp. 1350 · District Court, S.D. California · Mar 7, 1991

Bilbrey by Bilbrey v. Brown, 738 F.2d 1462, 1471 (9th Cir.1984). In Bilbrey, plaintiffs were fifth grade students suing to recover for allegedly unlawful searches by school officials. Id. at 1463 . … Patsy v. Board of Regents, 457 U.S. 496 , 102 S.Ct. 2557 , 73 L.Ed.2d 172 (1982). Because the administrative proceedings in this case have been terminated by agreement of the parties, Patsy is now applicable.

Elwood

69 F. Supp. 368 · District Court, S.D. California · Jan 20, 1947

Minch, 2 Cir., 1921, 271 F. 192 ; Courtney v. … While the presence of a crew on board the Elwood would have avoided collision, assuming one occurred, the forseeable circumstances did not call for a crew on board. 6.

Berry v. Westover

70 F. Supp. 537 · District Court, S.D. California · Feb 19, 1947

, until the decision of the Board has become final.” … Reese v.

Hotel Sherman, Inc. v. Harlow

186 F. Supp. 618 · District Court, S.D. California · Sep 14, 1960

The foundation and operation of the Pump Room and publicity received by it is described in the cases of Ambassador East, Inc. v. Shelton Corners, Inc., D.C.S.D.N.Y.1954, 120 F.Supp. 551 ; Ambassador East, Inc. v. … This method of handling a trade name or trade-mark dispute is not new and was used in the eases of Hanover Star Milling Co. v. Metcalf, 240 U.S. 403 , 36 S.Ct. 357 , 60 L.Ed. 713 , and United Drug Co. v.

Holland v. Bank of America

673 F. Supp. 1511 · District Court, S.D. California · Jun 4, 1987

In Miller v. … See Wiskotoni v. Michigan National Bank-West, 716 F.2d 378 (6th Cir.1983). Second, Holland argues that the Act does not apply because he was not terminated directly by the Board of Directors.

Tipton v. Bearl Sprott Co.

93 F. Supp. 496 · District Court, S.D. California · Oct 18, 1950

Santa Cruz Fruit Packing Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 303 U.S. 453, 467 , 58 S.Ct. 656, 660 , 82 L.Ed. 954 ; Kirschbaum v. Walling, 316 U.S. 517, 526 , 62 S.Ct. 1116, 1121 , 86 L.Ed. 1638 . … The case of Basik v.

Knudsen Creamery Co. of California v. United States

121 F. Supp. 860 · District Court, S.D. California · Jun 3, 1954

United States, 1953, 111 F.Supp. 243, 244, 247 , 124 Ct.Cl. 686 ; (2) that the minutes of a meeting of plaintiff’s Board of Directors authorizing execution of the instruments disclose inter alia, that: “The president * * … . at page 563 ; (6) that since substance controls over form and labels, the “Credit Agreement” and the instruments in controversy must be read together in the light of the relevant minutes and resolutions of plaintiff’s Board

In re Club New Yorker

14 F. Supp. 694 · District Court, S.D. California · May 5, 1936

(C.C.A.2, 1908) 166 F. 427 ; Brown v. Four-In-One Coal Co. (C.C.A. 6, 1923) 286 F. 512 , certiorari denied (1923) 262 U.S. 749 , 43 S.Ct. 524 , 67 L.Ed. 1213 . … of Education v.

In re Ernst

2 F.R.D. 447 · District Court, S.D. California · Jul 9, 1942

Admitting that the Board of Tax Appeals is not a court in the sense of a judicial entity, Old Colony Trust Co., et al., v. Commissioner, 279 U. … In State of Arizona v.

Wilshire-La Cienega Gardens Co. v. Riddell

148 F. Supp. 938 · District Court, S.D. California · Aug 13, 1956

Acer Realty Co. v. Commissioner, 8 Cir., 132 F.2d 512 . No evidence is found in the records of the action at bar to substantiate the claim of $9,000 for services rendered by each or any of these individuals. … On January 27, 1950, a special meeting of the board of directors of Wilshire-La Cienega was held.

United States v. Rayor

204 F. Supp. 486 · District Court, S.D. California · Apr 16, 1962

In Albrecht v. … (Sells v.

Howe v. United States

226 F. Supp. 566 · District Court, S.D. California · Feb 10, 1964

The president of Newport Bay Company appoints the Balboa Bay Club board of governors; this group consists of five directors of the corporation and a number of prominent club members. … A comparable case is James Hotel Company v. Commissioner, 39 T.C. No. 12 (1962), aff’d, 325 F.2d 280 (10th Cir.