Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscasd

3,618 results

0.86s

  • In Re Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Securities Litigation

    452 F. Supp. 2d 1005 · District Court, S.D. California · Jun 2, 2006

    Brown (“Brown”) was Senior Vice President-Business Development and Planning; and Joseph C. Cook (“Cook”) was a director. Id. ¶ 62. … See Troy Group, Inc. v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Perez-Perez v. Westmoreland

    122 F. Supp. 385 · District Court, S.D. California · Apr 22, 1954

    Co. v. … Long v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Durham v. Continental Cent. Credit, Inc.

    600 F. Supp. 2d 1124 · District Court, S.D. California · Mar 20, 2008

    Defendants rely on Brown v. Professional Community Mgmt., Inc., 127 Cal. App.4th 532 , 25 Cal.Rptr.3d 617 (2005) and Berryman v. … In Taylor v. Cavalry Inv., LLC, 365 F.3d 572 (7th Cir.2004) and Jacobson v. Healthcare Fin.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Carr v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.

    64 F. Supp. 40 · District Court, S.D. California · Dec 27, 1945

    Bruce Brown, about the amount of the commission to be paid to said store. … In Piantadosi v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Atlantic & P. R. v. United States

    76 F. 186 · District Court, S.D. California · Aug 11, 1896

    Co. v. Maryland, 21 Wall. 456 ; Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co. v. Iowa, 94 U. S. 155 ; Peik v. Railroad Co., Id. 164 ; Railroad Co. v. Blake, Id. 180 ; Ruggles v. Illinois, 108 U. S. 531 , 2 Sup. Ct. 832. … Co. v. U. S., 93 U.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • McLandrich v. Southern California Edison Co.

    942 F. Supp. 457 · District Court, S.D. California · Jul 29, 1996

    Janice Brown, Esq. and Jim Miller, Esq. appeared on behalf of defendant INPO. Ned Isokawa, Esq. appeared on behalf of defendant SDGE. … British Airways Board v. Boeing Co., 585 F.2d 946, 951 (9th Cir.1978), reh’g den,, 441 U.S. 968 , 99 S.Ct. 2420 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1074 (1979).

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Rancho Santa Fe Ass'n v. United States

    589 F. Supp. 54 · District Court, S.D. California · Jan 31, 1984

    board. … See, People’s Educational Camp Society, Inc. v. Commissioner, 331 F.2d 923, 932 (2d Cir.1964).

    Disagreed with by Flat Top Lake Association, Inc. v. United States, 868 F.2d 108 (1989)Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Board of Trustees of the San Diego Theatrical Pension Trust Fund v. Vincent

    District Court, S.D. California · Apr 20, 2020

    Abex Corp. v. Ski’s Enterprises, Inc., 748 F.2d 513, 11 516 (9th Cir. 1984) (citation omitted); Schirmer Stevedoring Co. Ltd. v. … Co., v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Green v. Ludford Fruit Products, Inc.

    39 F. Supp. 985 · District Court, S.D. California · Jul 18, 1941

    As was stated by Judge Soper in DixiCola Laboratories, Inc. v. … See, for example, Dixi-Cola Laboratories, Inc. v. Coca-Cola Co., 4 Cir., 1941, 117 F.2d 352 , at page 360, in which "Dixi-Cola” and “Coca-Cola” were products involved; also Miles Laboratories, Inc. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • United States v. Certain Parcels of Land in Los Angeles County

    63 F. Supp. 175 · District Court, S.D. California · Sep 18, 1945

    In re De Martini v. San Francisco, 107 Cal. 402 , 40 P. 496 ; Cordano v. … Quinn v. Anderson, 70 Cal. 456 , 11 P. 746 , 747: Huffman v. Hall, 102 Cal. 26, 30 , 36 P. 417, 418 . See California Nav. & Imp. Co. v. Union Trans.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Downen v. Chafee

    328 F. Supp. 407 · District Court, S.D. California · Jun 18, 1971

    Craycroft v. Ferrall, 408 F.2d 587, 597 (9th Cir. 1969). The second case involving an attempt to compel reinstatement is Carter v. Seamans, 411 F.2d 767 (5th Cir. 1969). … Also cited by defendants is Stanford v. United States, 413 F.2d 1048 (5th Cir. 1969). Plaintiff was seeking to nullify his dishonorable discharge.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re Franklin Wireless Corp. Derivative Litigation

    District Court, S.D. California · Mar 18, 2024

    Carmen v. … Lee and David Brown, respectively.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United States v. Goodwin

    1 F.2d 36 · District Court, S.D. California · Aug 4, 1924

    search any private dwelling occupied as such unless it is being used for the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor, or unless it is in part used for some business purpose such as a store, shop, saloon, restaurant, hotel, or boarding … Supp. 1919, §§ 102121, 10496%a-10490%,v).

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • International Union of United Brewery, Flour, Cereal & Soft Drink Workers v. California State Brewers' Institute

    25 F. Supp. 870 · District Court, S.D. California · Feb 23, 1938

    The Supreme Court noted in National Labor Relations Board v. … A pertinent decision is that of United Electric Coal Companies v. Rice et al., 7 Cir., 80 F.2d 1 . With general relation to the same subject is Apex Hosiery Co. v. Leader, 3 Cir., 90 F.2d 155 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Le Baron v. Kern County Farm Labor Union

    80 F. Supp. 151 · District Court, S.D. California · Jul 3, 1948

    It seems to me that they have been pretty well covered by Judge McCormick of this District when he heard and decided the case of Lebaron v. … Lebaron v. Printing Specialties and Paper Converters Union, Local 388 (A. F. L.) 75 F.Supp. 678 . I think that that covers the views which I care to express.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Cobb v. Danzig

    190 F.R.D. 564 · District Court, S.D. California · Nov 30, 1999

    Brazil v. Department of Navy, 66 F.3d 193 (9th Cir.1995). In Department of the Navy v. Egan, 484 U.S. 518 , 108 S.Ct. 818 , 98 L.Ed.2d 918 (1988) and Webster v. … Likewise, in Dorfmont v. Brown, 913 F.2d 1399 (9th Cir.1990), the Ninth Circuit held that the decision to grant or revoke a security clearance is committed to the discretion of the President by law. Id. at 1401 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Low v. Trump University, LLC

    246 F. Supp. 3d 1295 · District Court, S.D. California · Mar 31, 2017

    Indeed, Denney v. … John Brown Brown took the initiative to foster relationships with, and encourage, the other Class Representatives, particularly as trial approached. (See Low, Dkt. No. 590-1 at 11; Cohen, Dkt. No. 295-1 at 11.)

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • In re Davis Standard Bread Co.

    46 F. Supp. 841 · District Court, S.D. California · Dec 4, 1941

    Western Lithograph Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 11 Cal.2d 156 , 78 P.2d 731 , 117 A.L.R. 838 . … In the case of Reinecke v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • United States v. Silva

    272 F. Supp. 46 · District Court, S.D. California · Aug 28, 1967

    Second, it subjects *49 any unlicensed person to a penalty of $100.00 if he serves as a licensed officer on board the vessel. … Federal Maritime Commission v. Anglo-Canadian Shipping Company, Ltd., 9 Cir., 335 F.2d 255, 258 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • City of Fresno v. Edmonston

    131 F. Supp. 421 · District Court, S.D. California · May 9, 1955

    N.L.R.B. v. New York State Labor Relations Board, D.C.N.Y.1952, 106 F.Supp. 149 , and Weiderhoff v. … In Board of Governors, etc. v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.