Case law

Schonfeld v. City of Carlsbad

978 F. Supp. 1329 · District Court, S.D. California · Sep 5, 1997

Wilson v. Garcia, 471 U.S. 261, 266-67 , 105 S.Ct. 1938, 1941-42 , 85 L.Ed.2d 254 (1985). As noted by the Seventh Circuit in Soignier v. … Brown, and City Engineer Lloyd B.

Stein v. Dowling

867 F. Supp. 2d 1087 · District Court, S.D. California · Apr 4, 2012

See Rigdon v. … Winter v. NRDC, 555 U.S. 7, 20 , 129 S.Ct. 365 , 172 L.Ed.2d 249 (2008); see also Munaf v.

Erhart v. BofI Holding, Inc.

269 F. Supp. 3d 1059 · District Court, S.D. California · Sep 11, 2017

Brown v. Mortensen, 51 Cal.4th 1052, 1070 , 126 Cal.Rptr.3d 428 , 253 P.3d 522 (2011) (citing Loder v. City of Glendale, 14 Cal.4th 846, 859 , 59 Cal.Rptr.2d 696 , 927 P.2d 1200 (1997); Heller v. Norcal Mutual Ins. … See Brown v. Superior Court, 34 Cal.2d 559, 564 , 212 P.2d 878 (1949).

United States v. Person

223 F. Supp. 982 · District Court, S.D. California · Nov 27, 1963

United States v. Brown, 333 U.S. 18 , 68 S.Ct. 376 , 92 L.Ed. 442 (1947), rehearing denied, 333 U.S. 850 , 68 S.Ct. 657 , 92 L.Ed. 1132 (1948), and Rutledge v. United States, 146 F.2d 199 (5th. Cir. 1944). … Brown, supra, at page 26 of 333 U.S., at page 380 of 68 S.Ct., 92 L.Ed. 442.

Balelo v. Klutznick

519 F. Supp. 573 · District Court, S.D. California · Jul 24, 1981

Also, in United States v. Piner, 608 F.2d 358 (9th Cir. 1979), the boarding of a pleasure craft in San Francisco Bay for routine safety and document check was held to be a search. … R., 282 U.S. 311, 328 , 51 S.Ct. 159, 163 , 75 L.Ed. 359 (1931); Standard Airlines v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 177 F.2d 18 (D.C.Cir.1949); Smyth v. Lubbers, 398 F.Supp. 777 (W.D.Mich.1975).

Tampa Tugs and Towing, Inc. v. M/V SANDANGER

242 F. Supp. 576 · District Court, S.D. California · Apr 13, 1965

Fowler v. Rathbones, 79 U.S. (10 Wall.) 102 , 20 L.Ed. 281 (1870). Counsel for silver interest cites Pacific Mail S. S. Co. v. New York, H. & R. Min. … Case Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 321 U.S. 332 , 64 S.Ct. 576 , 88 L.Ed. 762 (1944), and Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, 321 U.S. 678 , 64 S.Ct. 830 , 88 L. Ed. 1007 (1944).

In Re Bay Cities Guaranty Building-Loan Ass'n

48 F.2d 623 · District Court, S.D. California · Apr 9, 1931

The Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Cir *625 cuit, in the ease of Gamble v. … See Circuit Court of Appeals decisions, Ninth Circuit, in Wilson et al. v. Continental Building & Loan Association, 232 F. 824 , and Merchants’ National Bank v. The Same, 232 F. 828 .

Greenfield MHP Associates, L.P. v. Ametek, Inc.

145 F. Supp. 3d 1000 · District Court, S.D. California · Nov 18, 2015

Oct. 31, 2014) (citing United States v. 14.02 Acres of Land More or Less in Fresno County, 547 F.3d 943, 955 (9th Cir.2008)). This includes documents in the public files of the Water Board and DTSC. … Venuto v.

Ryan Aeronautical Co. v. International Union, United Automobile Aircraft & Agricultural Implement Workers

179 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, S.D. California · Dec 9, 1959

v. … Justice Bradley stated in Clafiin v.

Smale & Robinson, Inc. v. United States

123 F. Supp. 457 · District Court, S.D. California · Jul 29, 1954

See Spencer v. Railroad Retirement Board, supra, 166 F.2d at page 343 ; Bowles v. Indianapolis Glove Co., 7 Cir., 1945, 150 F.2d 597 ; Nichols & Co. v. … Commissioner, 1945, 80 U.S.App.D.C. 264 , 152 F.2d 132, 135 ; Joseph Eichelberger & Co. v. Comm’r, 5 Cir., 1937, 88 F.2d 874 ; United States v. Brown, 6 Cir., 1936, 86 F.2d 798 ; see: Woodworth v.

Romero v. Securus Techs., Inc.

383 F. Supp. 3d 1069 · District Court, S.D. California · Apr 17, 2019

v. … Brown , 2012 WL 5818300 , at *5 (quotation and citation omitted).

Stanz

District Court, S.D. California · Mar 9, 2026

25 Board of Directors, and assigned rights in the JGH Platform to JGH, allowing Brown to 26 become JGH's sole director. … Thomas v.

Monolith Portland Midwest Co. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.

102 F. Supp. 951 · District Court, S.D. California · Feb 20, 1952

Bauman v. Ross, 1896, 167 U.S. 584, 593 , 17 S.Ct. 969 , 42 L.Ed. 270 ; Dohany v. Rogers, 1929, 281 U.S. 362, 369 , 50 S.Ct. 299 , 74 L.Ed. 904 ; U. S. v. Hess, 8 Cir., 1934, 70 F.2d 142 ; U. S. v. … Allen v. United States, D. C., 1926, 10 F.2d 807, 809 . (3) Congress took great pains to specify the qualifications of those who were to sit on the newly created Appeal Boards.

In re Graham

132 F. Supp. 69 · District Court, S.D. California · May 31, 1955

Brown v. Allen, 1952, 344 U.S. 443 , 73 S.Ct. 397 , 97 L.Ed. 469 ; United States ex rel. Smith v. Baldi, 1953, 344 U.S. 561 , 73 S.Ct. 391 , 97 L.Ed. 549 . … In interpreting this section, the Supreme Court stated in Brown v.

United States v. County of San Diego

249 F. Supp. 321 · District Court, S.D. California · Feb 1, 1966

. *323 Kern-Limerick Inc. v. Scurlock, 347 U.S. 110, 122 , 74 S.Ct. 403 , 98 L.Ed. 546 (1954); Board of Directors v. Reconstruction Finance Corp., 170 F.2d 430 (8th Cir. 1948). … Every well-grounded doubt on the subject should be resolved in favor of the immunity, Austin v. Board of Aldermen, 74 U.S. (7 Wall.) 694 , 19 L.Ed. 224 (1869); Board of Directors v.

Greeson v. Imperial Irrigation Dist.

55 F.2d 321 · District Court, S.D. California · Dec 5, 1931

See Jackson v. United States, 230 U. S. 18 , 33 S. Ct. 1011 , 57 L. Ed. 1363 , and Gray v. Reclamation District, 174 Cal. 624 , 163 P. 1024 . … In San Joaquin Irrigation Co. v.

Quisenberry v. Compass Vision, Inc.

618 F. Supp. 2d 1223 · District Court, S.D. California · Nov 14, 2007

Clegg v. Cult Awareness Network, 18 F.3d 752, 754-55 (9th Cir.1994) (citations omitted). Plaintiff is a registered nurse working under the supervision of the California State Board of Nursing (“the Board”). … Pursuant to her contract with the Board, Plaintiff was required to submit to random substance abuse tests.

The Prahova

38 F. Supp. 418 · District Court, S.D. California · Apr 15, 1941

Ed. 1008 ; Canada Malting Co. v. Paterson Co., 1932, 285 U.S. 413 , 52 S.Ct. 413 , 76 L.Ed. 837 ; Heredia v. … and gives Captain order to detain him on board.

Meyer v. United States

244 F. Supp. 103 · District Court, S.D. California · Jul 8, 1965

The court in Tomlinson v. … [Citing Comm. v. Duberstein, supra.] The court concludes, after a detailed consideration of the evidence in this case, that the dominant purpose of the Board of Directors in making the payments to Mrs.

United States v. Ford

3 F.2d 643 · District Court, S.D. California · Jan 5, 1925

The case of Hudson v. Guestier, 6 Cranch, 281 , 3 L. … Rex v. *648 Brisac, 4 East, 164. And is again settled by this ease of Latham v. United States (C. C. A.) 2 F.(2d) 208 .