Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscasd

3,618 results

1.91s

  • United States v. Rushlow

    385 F. Supp. 795 · District Court, S.D. California · Dec 9, 1974

    Lombardino v. Heyd, 318 F.Supp. 648, 650 (E.D.La.1970); see, United States v. Hallman, 365 F.2d 289, 291 (3rd Cir. 1966); Brown v. Kearney, 355 F.2d 199, 200 (5th Cir. 1966). … See, United States v. Brown, 488 F.2d 94, 95 (5th Cir. 1973).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Wong v. Hoy

    173 F. Supp. 855 · District Court, S.D. California · Mar 2, 1959

    United States v. Citizen’s Loan & Trust Co., 316 U.S. 209, 214 , 62 S.Ct. 1026 , 86 L.Ed. 1387 ; United States v. Madigan, 300 U.S. 500, 505 , 57 S.Ct. 566 , 81 L.Ed. 767 ; United States v. … Jackson, 280 U.S. 183, 193 ; United States v. Short, 9 Cir., 240 F.2d 292 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Lema v. The Board of Trustees of the California State University System

    District Court, S.D. California · Mar 28, 2024

    V; Castillo v. … Wong v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United States v. Finn

    127 F. Supp. 158 · District Court, S.D. California · Nov 5, 1954

    The applicable California statute provides in part that the “board of any school district may sell * * * for cash *164 * * *Cal.Education Code, § 18701. … . § 667; Nahhas v. Browning, *168 1919, 181 Cal. 55 , 183 P. 442 , 6 A.L.R. 476 ; Cf. 28 U.S.C. §§ 2674 , 2680; United States v. Miller, supra, 317 U.S. at page 380 , 63 S.Ct. at page 283 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Golconda Petroleum Corporation v. Petrol Corporation

    46 F. Supp. 23 · District Court, S.D. California · Jul 31, 1942

    Henry v. Vineland Irr. District, 1903, 140 Cal. 376 , 73 P. 1061 ; Townsend v. Driver, 1907, 5 Cal.App. 581 , 90 P. 1071 ; Stern & Goodman Inv. Co. v. Danziger, 1929, 206 Cal. 456 , 274 P. 748 . … Nickelson v. Nestles Milk Products, 5 Cir., 107 F.2d 17 , see cases footnote, page 18. Woulfe v. Atlantic City Steel Pier Co., 3 Cir., 124 F.2d 322 . Andrew Stewart v. James H.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • IQVIA Inc. v. Medimpact Healthcare Systems, Inc.

    District Court, S.D. California · Apr 15, 2022

    Further, Dale Brown 14 engaged in unlawful conduct while serving on the Board of the JV and was also General 15 Manager. … Brown, as a board member and general manager of 16 the Joint Venture, did not owe a fiduciary duty to IQVIA AG and IQVIA Inc. because 17 they were not members of the Joint Venture. (Dkt. No. 36-1 at 24-27.)

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Meredith v. United Air Lines

    41 F.R.D. 34 · District Court, S.D. California · Aug 26, 1966

    Very shortly after the accident, the Civil Aeronautics Board conducted an investigation of the near-collision. … Downing, in an affidavit filed September 2, 1964, states that he was informed “soon after the accident” of the Civil Aeronautics Board investigation and that “after four weeks’ investigation, [the Civil Aeronautics Board]

    Cited 35 timesPublished
  • Sevitt v. Del Guercio

    150 F. Supp. 56 · District Court, S.D. California · Mar 27, 1957

    Hamilton v. Rathbone, 175 U.S. 414 , 20 S.Ct. 155 , 44 L.Ed. 219 ; Thompson v. United States, 246 U.S. 547 , 38 S.Ct. 349 , 62 L.Ed. 876 ; Crooks v. Harrelson, 282 U.S. 55 , 51 S.Ct. 49 , 75 L.Ed. 156 . … This Court in Acosta v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Penuelas v. Moreno

    198 F. Supp. 441 · District Court, S.D. California · Sep 14, 1961

    V. … V.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • United States v. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Diego Region

    District Court, S.D. California · Jun 16, 2022

    , San Diego Region (“Regional Board”)—Order No. … CMAX, Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • In Re Los Angeles Lumber Products Co.

    46 F. Supp. 77 · District Court, S.D. California · Sep 29, 1941

    See Jackson v. … Co. v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Nguon v. Madden

    District Court, S.D. California · Mar 20, 2023

    A class of prisoners previously raised the same Ex Post Facto 2 challenge to Marsy’s Law in Gilman v. Brown, 110 F. Supp. 3d 989, 990 (E.D. … .”); see also Gilman v. Brown, 2013 WL 1904424, at *1 22 n.1 (E.D. Cal. May 7, 2013) (noting the court’s discretion to grant opt-out requests filed on 23 the docket).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Avila-Contreras v. McGranery

    112 F. Supp. 264 · District Court, S.D. California · May 22, 1953

    of Immigration Appeals and was dismissed by the Board. … As stated in McNally v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • J.R. Norton Co. v. Arizmendi

    108 F.R.D. 647 · District Court, S.D. California · Jul 15, 1985

    Resident Advisory Board v. Rizzo, 97 F.R.D. 749, 753 (E.D.PA.1983). Applying the privilege to the ALRB documents in camera, the requirements of the privilege are not satisfied as to some of the documents. … Each document is a confidential communication between ALRB attorneys and The Board regarding the securing or rendering of legal advice pertaining to matters pending Board action.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Flaherty v. McDonald

    178 F. Supp. 544 · District Court, S.D. California · Nov 18, 1959

    Pelelas v. Caterpillar Tractor Co., 7 Cir., 113 F.2d 629 ; Weeks v. Boreco Oil Co., 7 Cir., 125 F.2d 84 ; Underwood v. Maloney, D.C., 152 F.Supp. 648 . … Defendants McDonald and Abel were servants of the International Executive Board; the Board was. not the servant of the president and', secretary-treasurer.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Ex parte Keizo Shibata

    30 F.2d 942 · District Court, S.D. California · Feb 27, 1929

    S. v. Ju Toy, 198 U. S. 261 , 25 S. Ct. 644 , 49 L. Ed. 1040 ; Davies v. Manolis (C. C. A.) 179 F. 823 . … Rosen v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Ollier v. Sweetwater Union High School District

    858 F. Supp. 2d 1093 · District Court, S.D. California · Feb 9, 2012

    Cohen v. Brown Univ. (“Cohen II”), 101 F.3d 155, 165 (1st Cir.1996). … Brown v. Wright, 588 F.2d 708, 710 (9th Cir.1978) Defendant has not moved for a new trial as required under Rule 59(a)(2).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Overton v. City of Los Angeles

    263 F. 951 · District Court, S.D. California · Feb 26, 1920

    Brown v. State of Maryland, 12 Wheat. 419 , 6 L. Ed. 678 ; Royall v. State of Virginia, 116 U. S. 572 , 6 Sup. Ct. 510, 29 L. Ed. 735 . The opinion in Brown v. Maryland was written by Chief Justice Marshall. … Such a license fee was held to be a tax by this court in the case of Brown v. Maryland, 12 Wheat. 419 [ 6 L.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dean v. City of San Diego

    275 F. 228 · District Court, S.D. California · Aug 12, 1921

    Pollard v. Hagen, 3 How. 212 , 11 L. Ed. 565 ; Weber v. Board Harbor Commissioners, 18 Wall. 57, 65 , 21 L. Ed. 798 ; City & County San Francisco v. Le Roy, 138 U. S. 656, 670 , 11 Sup. Ct. 364, 34 L. Ed. 1096 . … Knight v. United Land Ass’n, 142 U. S. 161 , 12 Sup. Ct. 258, 35 L. Ed. 974 ; St. Louis Smelting Co. v. Kemp, 104 U. S. 636 , 26 L. Ed. 875 ; Klauber v. Higgins, 117 Cal. 451 , 49 Pac. 466 ; Williams v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Schonfeld v. City of Carlsbad

    978 F. Supp. 1329 · District Court, S.D. California · Sep 5, 1997

    Wilson v. Garcia, 471 U.S. 261, 266-67 , 105 S.Ct. 1938, 1941-42 , 85 L.Ed.2d 254 (1985). As noted by the Seventh Circuit in Soignier v. … Brown, and City Engineer Lloyd B.

    Cited 13 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.