Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
3,618 results
1.91s
385 F. Supp. 795 · District Court, S.D. California · Dec 9, 1974
Lombardino v. Heyd, 318 F.Supp. 648, 650 (E.D.La.1970); see, United States v. Hallman, 365 F.2d 289, 291 (3rd Cir. 1966); Brown v. Kearney, 355 F.2d 199, 200 (5th Cir. 1966). … See, United States v. Brown, 488 F.2d 94, 95 (5th Cir. 1973).
Cited 7 timesPublished173 F. Supp. 855 · District Court, S.D. California · Mar 2, 1959
United States v. Citizen’s Loan & Trust Co., 316 U.S. 209, 214 , 62 S.Ct. 1026 , 86 L.Ed. 1387 ; United States v. Madigan, 300 U.S. 500, 505 , 57 S.Ct. 566 , 81 L.Ed. 767 ; United States v. … Jackson, 280 U.S. 183, 193 ; United States v. Short, 9 Cir., 240 F.2d 292 .
Cited 2 timesPublishedLema v. The Board of Trustees of the California State University System
District Court, S.D. California · Mar 28, 2024
V; Castillo v. … Wong v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown127 F. Supp. 158 · District Court, S.D. California · Nov 5, 1954
The applicable California statute provides in part that the “board of any school district may sell * * * for cash *164 * * *Cal.Education Code, § 18701. … . § 667; Nahhas v. Browning, *168 1919, 181 Cal. 55 , 183 P. 442 , 6 A.L.R. 476 ; Cf. 28 U.S.C. §§ 2674 , 2680; United States v. Miller, supra, 317 U.S. at page 380 , 63 S.Ct. at page 283 .
Cited 6 timesPublishedGolconda Petroleum Corporation v. Petrol Corporation
46 F. Supp. 23 · District Court, S.D. California · Jul 31, 1942
Henry v. Vineland Irr. District, 1903, 140 Cal. 376 , 73 P. 1061 ; Townsend v. Driver, 1907, 5 Cal.App. 581 , 90 P. 1071 ; Stern & Goodman Inv. Co. v. Danziger, 1929, 206 Cal. 456 , 274 P. 748 . … Nickelson v. Nestles Milk Products, 5 Cir., 107 F.2d 17 , see cases footnote, page 18. Woulfe v. Atlantic City Steel Pier Co., 3 Cir., 124 F.2d 322 . Andrew Stewart v. James H.
Cited 7 timesPublishedIQVIA Inc. v. Medimpact Healthcare Systems, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California · Apr 15, 2022
Further, Dale Brown 14 engaged in unlawful conduct while serving on the Board of the JV and was also General 15 Manager. … Brown, as a board member and general manager of 16 the Joint Venture, did not owe a fiduciary duty to IQVIA AG and IQVIA Inc. because 17 they were not members of the Joint Venture. (Dkt. No. 36-1 at 24-27.)
Cited 0 timesUnknown41 F.R.D. 34 · District Court, S.D. California · Aug 26, 1966
Very shortly after the accident, the Civil Aeronautics Board conducted an investigation of the near-collision. … Downing, in an affidavit filed September 2, 1964, states that he was informed “soon after the accident” of the Civil Aeronautics Board investigation and that “after four weeks’ investigation, [the Civil Aeronautics Board]
Cited 35 timesPublished150 F. Supp. 56 · District Court, S.D. California · Mar 27, 1957
Hamilton v. Rathbone, 175 U.S. 414 , 20 S.Ct. 155 , 44 L.Ed. 219 ; Thompson v. United States, 246 U.S. 547 , 38 S.Ct. 349 , 62 L.Ed. 876 ; Crooks v. Harrelson, 282 U.S. 55 , 51 S.Ct. 49 , 75 L.Ed. 156 . … This Court in Acosta v.
Cited 1 timesPublished198 F. Supp. 441 · District Court, S.D. California · Sep 14, 1961
V. … V.
Cited 26 timesPublishedUnited States v. California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Diego Region
District Court, S.D. California · Jun 16, 2022
, San Diego Region (“Regional Board”)—Order No. … CMAX, Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownIn Re Los Angeles Lumber Products Co.
46 F. Supp. 77 · District Court, S.D. California · Sep 29, 1941
See Jackson v. … Co. v.
Cited 21 timesPublishedDistrict Court, S.D. California · Mar 20, 2023
A class of prisoners previously raised the same Ex Post Facto 2 challenge to Marsy’s Law in Gilman v. Brown, 110 F. Supp. 3d 989, 990 (E.D. … .”); see also Gilman v. Brown, 2013 WL 1904424, at *1 22 n.1 (E.D. Cal. May 7, 2013) (noting the court’s discretion to grant opt-out requests filed on 23 the docket).
Cited 0 timesUnknown112 F. Supp. 264 · District Court, S.D. California · May 22, 1953
of Immigration Appeals and was dismissed by the Board. … As stated in McNally v.
Cited 3 timesPublished108 F.R.D. 647 · District Court, S.D. California · Jul 15, 1985
Resident Advisory Board v. Rizzo, 97 F.R.D. 749, 753 (E.D.PA.1983). Applying the privilege to the ALRB documents in camera, the requirements of the privilege are not satisfied as to some of the documents. … Each document is a confidential communication between ALRB attorneys and The Board regarding the securing or rendering of legal advice pertaining to matters pending Board action.
Cited 5 timesPublished178 F. Supp. 544 · District Court, S.D. California · Nov 18, 1959
Pelelas v. Caterpillar Tractor Co., 7 Cir., 113 F.2d 629 ; Weeks v. Boreco Oil Co., 7 Cir., 125 F.2d 84 ; Underwood v. Maloney, D.C., 152 F.Supp. 648 . … Defendants McDonald and Abel were servants of the International Executive Board; the Board was. not the servant of the president and', secretary-treasurer.
Cited 8 timesPublished30 F.2d 942 · District Court, S.D. California · Feb 27, 1929
S. v. Ju Toy, 198 U. S. 261 , 25 S. Ct. 644 , 49 L. Ed. 1040 ; Davies v. Manolis (C. C. A.) 179 F. 823 . … Rosen v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedOllier v. Sweetwater Union High School District
858 F. Supp. 2d 1093 · District Court, S.D. California · Feb 9, 2012
Cohen v. Brown Univ. (“Cohen II”), 101 F.3d 155, 165 (1st Cir.1996). … Brown v. Wright, 588 F.2d 708, 710 (9th Cir.1978) Defendant has not moved for a new trial as required under Rule 59(a)(2).
Cited 7 timesPublishedOverton v. City of Los Angeles
263 F. 951 · District Court, S.D. California · Feb 26, 1920
Brown v. State of Maryland, 12 Wheat. 419 , 6 L. Ed. 678 ; Royall v. State of Virginia, 116 U. S. 572 , 6 Sup. Ct. 510, 29 L. Ed. 735 . The opinion in Brown v. Maryland was written by Chief Justice Marshall. … Such a license fee was held to be a tax by this court in the case of Brown v. Maryland, 12 Wheat. 419 [ 6 L.
Cited 0 timesPublished275 F. 228 · District Court, S.D. California · Aug 12, 1921
Pollard v. Hagen, 3 How. 212 , 11 L. Ed. 565 ; Weber v. Board Harbor Commissioners, 18 Wall. 57, 65 , 21 L. Ed. 798 ; City & County San Francisco v. Le Roy, 138 U. S. 656, 670 , 11 Sup. Ct. 364, 34 L. Ed. 1096 . … Knight v. United Land Ass’n, 142 U. S. 161 , 12 Sup. Ct. 258, 35 L. Ed. 974 ; St. Louis Smelting Co. v. Kemp, 104 U. S. 636 , 26 L. Ed. 875 ; Klauber v. Higgins, 117 Cal. 451 , 49 Pac. 466 ; Williams v.
Cited 5 timesPublished978 F. Supp. 1329 · District Court, S.D. California · Sep 5, 1997
Wilson v. Garcia, 471 U.S. 261, 266-67 , 105 S.Ct. 1938, 1941-42 , 85 L.Ed.2d 254 (1985). As noted by the Seventh Circuit in Soignier v. … Brown, and City Engineer Lloyd B.
Cited 13 timesPublished
Ask Donna