Case law

Greenwood v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.

129 F. Supp. 105 · District Court, S.D. California · Feb 28, 1955

Under Moore v. … The award of the Board and the judgment of a court are equally final.” The 10th Circuit in Reynolds v. Denver & Rio Grande Western R.

Newport Pacific Inc. v. County of San Diego

200 F.R.D. 628 · District Court, S.D. California · Jun 18, 2001

Artfield Builders Inc. v. Village of Buffalo Grove, 1992 WL 314185 , *1 (N.D.Ill.1992) citing United States v. Board of Educ. of City of Chicago, 610 F.Supp. 695, 698 (N.D.Ill.1985). … Id. at *2 citing United States v. Board of Educ. Of City of Chicago, 610 F.Supp. 695, 698 (N.D.Ill.1985) citing Coastal States Gas Corp. v.

California v. Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P.

569 F. Supp. 2d 1073 · District Court, S.D. California · Feb 29, 2008

Furthermore, the Regional Board has already rendered any threshold findings which might promote the Court’s efficiency, such as who caused the MVT contamination. See AICCO, Inc. v. … See Western Oil & Gas Assn. v.

Am. Fireglass, Corp. v. Moderustic, Inc.

365 F. Supp. 3d 1062 · District Court, S.D. California · Mar 15, 2019

See Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. Phillip Morris Inc. , 229 F.3d 1120 , 1130 (Fed. Cir. 2000). … Ormco Corp. , 463 F.3d at 1311-1312 (citing Brown & Williamson , 229 F.3d at 1130 (finding commercial success attributed to feature not present in the invention); Richdel, Inc. v.

Hob Nob Hill Restaurant v. Hotel Employees & Restaurant Employees International Union

660 F. Supp. 1266 · District Court, S.D. California · Apr 30, 1987

See Brown v. Hotel and Restaurant Employees, 468 U.S. 491, 502-03 , 104 S.Ct. 3179, 3185 , 82 L.Ed.2d 373 (1984); Brotherhood Railroad Trainmen v. … Guss v. Utah Labor Relations Board, 353 U.S. 1 , 77 S.Ct. 598 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1 (1957). . See, e.g, Sears, Roebuck v.

In Re Mathews Const. Co.

120 F. Supp. 818 · District Court, S.D. California · Apr 27, 1954

Pacific State Bank v. Coats, 9 Cir., 1913, 205 F. 618 ; Meyers v. El Tejon Oil & Refining Co., 1946, 29 Cal.2d 184 , 174 P.2d 1 ; Brainard v. … Goodman v. Global Industries, 1947, 80 Cal.App.2d 583 , 182 P.2d 300 ; California Corporations Code, § 1705 et seq. 3 . Pope v. Huth, 14 Cal. 404 .

Beauregard v. Wingard

230 F. Supp. 167 · District Court, S.D. California · Jun 1, 1964

Sola Electric v. Jefferson Electric Co., 1942, 317 U.S. 173, 176 , 63 S.Ct. 172, 174 , 87 L.Ed. 165 ; McNeese v. Board of Ed., 1963, 373 U.S. 668, 671 , 83 S.Ct. 1433, 1435 , 10 L.Ed.2d 622 ; Nesmith v. … McNeese v. Board of Education, 1963, 373 U.S. 668, 672 , S3 S.Ct. 1433, 1437, 10 L.Ed.2d 622 ; County of Allegheny v. Frank Mashuda Co., 360 U.S. 185, 188 , 79 S.Ct. 1060 , 3 L.Ed.2d 1163 ; Marshall v.

Lewis Food Co. v. Los Angeles Meat & Provision Drivers Union Local No. 626

159 F. Supp. 763 · District Court, S.D. California · Mar 3, 1958

National Labor Relations Board, 1944, 323 U.S. 248, 249 , 65 S.Ct. 238 , 89 L.Ed. 216 ; National Labor Relations Board v. Gilfillan Bros., 9 Cir., 1945, 148 F.2d 990, 991 . … Labor Relations Board v.

Tilikum v. Sea World Parks & Entertainment, Inc.

842 F. Supp. 2d 1259 · District Court, S.D. California · Feb 8, 2012

Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 , 85 S.Ct. 1678 , 14 L.Ed.2d 510 (1965), the separate but equal doctrine, i.e. Brown v. … Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954), sex discrimination, i.e. United States v.

United States v. Lynch

115 F. Supp. 735 · District Court, S.D. California · Oct 19, 1953

Cramer v. France, 9 Cir., 148 F.2d 801 ; Tyrrell v. U. S., 9 Cir., 200 F.2d 8 . In the case at bar the regular procedure was followed. Twice the local board classified registrant 1-A. … Cramer v. France, 148 F.2d 801 . The United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit came to the same conclusion in the case of Davis v. United States, 203 F.2d 853 , at page 857, in which the Court said: “ * * *.

Cohen

District Court, S.D. California · Aug 21, 2026

See Kentucky v. Graham, 473 U.S. 12 159, 169 n. 17 (1985) (“The Court has held that § 1983 was not intended to abrogate a 13 State’s Eleventh Amendment immunity”); see also Brown v. Cal. … First, the Board incorrectly relies on Board of Trustees of University of Alabama v. 3 Garrett, in which the Supreme Court held that claims arising under Title I of the ADA are 4 barred by the Eleventh Amendment. 531

United States v. Boyce

153 F. Supp. 2d 1194 · District Court, S.D. California · Jul 3, 2001

Franchise Tax Bd. v. Alcan Aluminum, 493 U.S. 331 , 338, 110 S.Ct. 661 , 107 L.Ed.2d 696 (1990); Jerron West, Inc. v. State of California State Board of Equalization, 129 F.3d 1334, 1339 (9th Cir.1997). … United States By and Through IRS v. McDermott, 507 U.S. 447, 449 , 113 S.Ct. 1526 , 123 L.Ed.2d 128 (1993); Thaler v. Household Finance Corp., 80 Cal.App.4th 1093, 1099 , 95 Cal.Rptr.2d 779 (2000); Cal.Civ.Code § 2897.

Hugev v. Dampskisaktieselskabet International

170 F. Supp. 601 · District Court, S.D. California · Jan 21, 1959

covering the forward section of No. 1 ’tween deck hatch, then remove the hatch boards, substitute the proper “queen beam”, and replace the hatch boards securely. … As a result, while plaintiff was engaged in helping with the work of clearing the hatch boards of cargo, one of the insecure hatch boards upon which he stepped gave way, permitting him to fall into the hold below, thereby

In re Bofi Holding, Inc.

382 F. Supp. 3d 992 · District Court, S.D. California · May 23, 2019

Beam v. Stewart , 833 A.2d 961 , 977 n.48 (Del. Ch. 2003) ; Feuer v. Redstone , 2018 WL 1870074 (Del. Ch. 2018). … Though Plaintiff cites to Rosenbloom v.

York v. Huerta-Garcia

36 F. Supp. 2d 1231 · District Court, S.D. California · Feb 5, 1999

Richards v. Harper, 864 F.2d 85, 88 (9th Cir.1988); Ivey v. Board of Regents of University of Alaska, 673 F.2d 266, 268 (9th Cir.1982). … The problems outlined above are exactly those contemplated in Brown v. Plaut, 131 F.3d 163 (D.C.Cir.1997).

Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceutical, Inc.

711 F. Supp. 546 · District Court, S.D. California · Feb 8, 1989

Adickes v. S.H. Kress and Co., 398 U.S. 144, 157 , 90 S.Ct. 1598, 1608 , 26 L.Ed.2d 142 (1970); International Union of Bricklayers v. Martin Jaska, Inc., 752 F.2d 1401 , 1405 (9th Cir.1985). … Defendant cites Brown v.

United States v. Kelley

24 F.2d 234 · District Court, S.D. California · Nov 8, 1927

S. v. Robbins et al., 269 U. S. 315 , 46 S. Ct. 148 , 70 L. Ed. 285 ; Stewart v. Stewart, 199 Cal. 318 , 249 P. 197 ; Roberts v. Wehmeyer, 191 Cal. 601 , 218 P. 22 . … St. § 5937]) v. Stevenson, 215 U. S. 190 , 30 S. Ct. 35 , 54 L. Ed. 153 ; U. S. v. Chamberlin, 219 U. S. 250 , 31 S. Ct. 155 , 55 L. Ed. 204 ; U. S. v. Ayer et al. (C. C. A.) 12 F.(2d) 194 ; U. S. v. Nashville, C. & St.

Perales Vara v. Laborers' International Union of North America, Local 89

662 F. Supp. 492 · District Court, S.D. California · May 13, 1987

Rosario v. … Rekant v. Shochtay-Gasos Local 466, Meatcutters, 320 F.2d 271, 277 (3d Cir.1963). Accord Bougie v. Carpenters, 67 LRRM 2402 (N.D.Ind.1968). 3.

United States v. Jasmagy

132 F. Supp. 547 · District Court, S.D. California · Jun 17, 1955

The defendant has cited the following cases: Gonzales v. United States, 348 U.S. 407 , 75 S.Ct. 409 ; Bradley v. United States, 348 U.S. 967 ; Duron v. United States, 9 Cir., 1955, 221 F.2d 187 ; Chernekoff v. … United States, 9 Cir., 1955, 219 F.2d 721 ; Ory v. United States, 5 Cir., 1953, 206 F.2d 500 ; United States v. Clare, D.C., 108 F.Supp. 307 ; United States v. Everngam, D.C., 102 F.Supp. 128 ; United States v.

United States v. 237,500 Acres of Land, more or less, in the counties of Inyo & Kern, State of California

236 F. Supp. 44 · District Court, S.D. California · Nov 24, 1964

In Miller v. U. … In Cementario Buxeda v.