Case law

Erhart v. Bofi Holding Inc.

District Court, S.D. California · Sep 28, 2023

Clark, 847 F.2d 1368, 1376 (9th Cir. 4 1988) (noting retaliatory intent “may be established by an inference derived from 5 circumstantial evidence”); see also Flores v. … This 8 instruction made it clear to the jury that “[o]nly the following violations of law alleged in 9 this case qualify for a SOX violation: violation of a rule or regulation of the SEC; or 10 violation of a federal

Godfrey v. Saul

District Court, S.D. California · Aug 26, 2021

In order to qualify for 5 disability benefits under the act, a claimant (1) must suffer from a medically determinable 6 impairment1 which has lasted or is likely to last for a continuous period of twelve months 7 or … claimant as to their 13 pain levels will not be considered conclusive evidence of a disability. 42 U.S.C. 14 § 423(d)(5)(A); see also 20 C.F.R. § 404.1529(a) (“[S]tatements about your pain will not 15 alone establish

BUCHANNON v. ASSOCIATED CREDIT SERVICES INC

District Court, S.D. California · Nov 17, 2021

“[A] single violation of section 1692e is sufficient to establish civil lability under the FDCPA.” Bentley v. … The 18 | Court finds that as the Mickalis court noted, a default may establish liability but does not 19 qualify as an admission on damages.

Sullivan v. Kijakazi

District Court, S.D. California · May 23, 2022

SUMMARY OF ALJ DECISION AND FIVE STEP EVALUATION 2 The ALJ’s decision explains the five-step evaluation process for determining 3 whether an individual has established eligibility for disability … Hampshire’s opinion as a “questionnaire” but as discussed below, 27 clearly treats it as a treating physician opinion in evaluating it. (AR 26.)