Case law

Le Baron v. Los Angeles Building & Construction Trades Council

84 F. Supp. 629 · District Court, S.D. California · May 26, 1949

. § 160 . 9 National Labor Relations Board v. … W. v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board, 1948, 336 U.S. 245, 251 , 69 S.Ct. 516 . 16 Gigoney v. Empire Storage & Ice Co., 1947, 336 U.S. 490 , 69 S.Ct. 684 . 17 Thornhill v.

MEDWAY v. Cate

756 F. Supp. 2d 1280 · District Court, S.D. California · Nov 17, 2010

Lewis v. … See Weir v.

Mendez v. Westminister School Dist.

64 F. Supp. 544 · District Court, S.D. California · Feb 18, 1946

Regents of University of California, supra, and West Virginia State Board of Education v. … Cumming v. Board of Education of Richmond County, supra.

Steel v. City of San Diego

726 F. Supp. 2d 1172 · District Court, S.D. California · Jun 30, 2010

During the call, Sisson-Brown allegedly spoke with McCollough. (Id.) … At approximately 10:37 p.m., Officer Ninness met with Bronold and Sisson-Brown in La Jolla.

Ex parte Asit Ranjan Ghosh

58 F. Supp. 851 · District Court, S.D. California · Nov 16, 1944

boards from state or national headquarters. … United States v. Bhagat Singh Thind, 261 U.S. 204 , 43 S.Ct. 338 , 67 L.Ed. 616 . He is, and at all times concerned in this proceeding was, a citizen or subject of British India.

Frausto v. Brownell

140 F. Supp. 660 · District Court, S.D. California · Apr 16, 1956

v. … Leong v.

Wilson Employees' Representation Plan v. Wilson & Co.

53 F. Supp. 23 · District Court, S.D. California · Nov 24, 1943

F. of L. v. National Labor Relations Board, 308 U.S. 401 , 60 S.Ct. 76 , 84 L.Ed. 448 ; National Labor Relations Board v. … F. of L. v. National Labor R. Board, 70 App.D.C. 62 , 103 F.2d 933 , and National Labor R. Bd. v. Star Pub.

Hermosa Amusement Corp. v. The Sakito Maru

41 F. Supp. 769 · District Court, S.D. California · Oct 31, 1941

Lawrence v. Minturn, 17 How. 100, 110 , 15 L.Ed. 58, 62 ; The Star of Hope (The Star of Hope v. Annan), 9 Wall. 203 , 19 L.Ed. 638 . … It is therefore apparent it is necessary to ascertain the sense Congress used the word “barge” in said section 395, just as Judge Brown did in The Mamie, supra.

Ex Parte Stewart

47 F. Supp. 410 · District Court, S.D. California · Sep 30, 1942

Except where an appeal is authorized, the Selective Service Act makes the decision of the Board on classification final. 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix § 310(a); see: United States ex rel. Broker v. Baird, D.C.N. … Ursitti v. Baird, D.C.N.Y.1941, 39 F. Supp. 872 ; Shimola v. Local Board, D.C. Ohio 1941, 40 F.Supp. 808 ; United States v. Grieme, 3 Cir., 1942, 128 F.2d 811, 814 ; Micheli v. Paullin, D.C.N.J.1942, 45 F. Supp. 687 .

Cox v. Doherty

44 F. Supp. 357 · District Court, S.D. California · Apr 10, 1942

The Brown patent, which covers wall panel, supra, provides: “The pan is filled with a supply of plaster or mortar of characteristics similar to those of the plaster or mortar used in the surrounding wall. … It has been held that to apply celotex boards to the smooth surface of metal sheets, or to substitute celotex for cork to form a lighter roof in a roofing construction, is not invention and this could be accomplished by any

Adelson v. United States

221 F. Supp. 31 · District Court, S.D. California · May 20, 1963

In the case of Hill v. … In Brooks v.

United States v. Hortze

179 F. Supp. 913 · District Court, S.D. California · Nov 20, 1959

On cross-examination, Inspector Hanks testified that defendant Gary had no foreign accent, was of fair complexion and had dark brown hair. … Trupiano v.

Upper Deck Authenticated, Ltd. v. CPG DIRECT

971 F. Supp. 1337 · District Court, S.D. California · Jan 8, 1997

In NEC Electronics v. … Exchange v.

Signal Gasoline Corporation v. United States

46 F. Supp. 276 · District Court, S.D. California · Jul 31, 1942

Buzard v. … McCulloch v. Norwood, 58 N.Y. 562, 568 . See, also, Judson v. Love, 35 Cal. 463 .

In re Gordon

250 F. 798 · District Court, S.D. California · May 7, 1918

Aldrich v. Kirkland, 8 Rich. (S. C.) 349, 353; Norris v. Cobb, 8 Rich. (S. C.) 58. I have been unable to find any other instances. … Boston v. Nichols, 47 Ill. 353 ; Hards v. Burton, 79 Ill. 54 .

Am. Fireglass, Corp. v. Moderustic, Inc.

365 F. Supp. 3d 1062 · District Court, S.D. California · Mar 15, 2019

See Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. Phillip Morris Inc. , 229 F.3d 1120 , 1130 (Fed. Cir. 2000). … Ormco Corp. , 463 F.3d at 1311-1312 (citing Brown & Williamson , 229 F.3d at 1130 (finding commercial success attributed to feature not present in the invention); Richdel, Inc. v.

Ventura Consol. Oil Fields v. Welch

6 F. Supp. 327 · District Court, S.D. California · Mar 20, 1934

of the Board. … Citing Lynch v. Turrish, 247 U. S. 221 , 38 S. Ct. 537 , 62 L. Ed. 1087 ; Southern Pacific Co. v. Lowe, 247 U. S. 330 , 38 S. Ct. 540 , 62 L. Ed. 1142 ; Gulf Oil Corporation v. Lewellyn, 248 U. S. 71 , 39 S.

United States ex rel. Russell v. Lawrence

55 F. Supp. 768 · District Court, S.D. California · Jun 6, 1944

And see Local Draft Board v. Connors, 9 Cir., 1941, 124 F.2d 388, 390 . The Congress of the United States, in this war, has been more tolerant towards the dissident than during the last war. … the registrant is accepted *772 by the army * * [Falbo v.

Mallonee v. Fahey

14 F.R.D. 273 · District Court, S.D. California · Dec 1, 1949

V. … V. Ammam, “Assistant Secretary.” . “Home Loan Bank Board “No. 388.

Warren v. Flying Tiger Line, Inc.

234 F. Supp. 223 · District Court, S.D. California · Sep 21, 1964

In Ross v. … The front of the ticket clearly indicates that the transportation under the boarding ticket was subject to the Warsaw Convention. See Seth v. British Overseas Airways Corporation, 329 F.2d 302 (1 Cir., 1964).