Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
3,618 results
1.63s
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Sripetch
District Court, S.D. California · Dec 16, 2024
See Stanz v. Brown, No. 3:22-CV- 01164-GPC-JLB, 2024 WL 4267191, at *1 n.1 (S.D. Cal. Sept. 23, 2024); Suarez v. … Jan. 10, 2023); see 27 also Radcliffe v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Oct 16, 2020
Inst., Walpole v. Hill, 472 U.S. 445, 455 12 (1985). “[T]he relevant question is whether there is any evidence in the record that could 13 support the conclusion reached by the disciplinary board.” Id. … Leer v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Sep 15, 2020
Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 21 U.S. 397, 415 (1997). Put differently, “a municipality sued under § 1983 is not subject to 22 vicarious liability for the acts of its agents.” Duvall v. … Davis v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownLaucella v. Lowe's Home Centers, LLC
District Court, S.D. California · Apr 22, 2024
Plaintiff alleges that, while selecting boards for a project in a Lowe’s 1 retail store in Carlsbad, California, “several 12-foot-long boards slid off the shelf and 2 landed directly on top of his right foot.” … Council of Laborers v. Pittsburg-Des Moines Steel Co., 69 F.3d 2 1034, 1038 (9th Cir. 1995) (quoting Maniar v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown799 F. Supp. 2d 1147 · District Court, S.D. California · Jun 30, 2011
Malley v. … Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 410 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997)).
Cited 3 timesPublishedMcNamara v. Wells Fargo & Company
District Court, S.D. California · Jul 29, 2022
Co. v. Lee Investments, LLC, 11 641 F.3d 1126, 1136 (9th Cir. 2011); Facedouble, Inc. v. Face.com, 2014 WL 585868, at 12 *1 (S.D. Cal. … .”); Weil v. Long Island Sav. Bank, 195 F.
Cited 0 timesUnknownMiles Laboratories, Inc. v. Frolich
195 F. Supp. 256 · District Court, S.D. California · Jun 8, 1961
Co. v. … Inside is a long cylindrical jar containing the tablets with a label similar to that on the outside box. 16 Defendant, on the other hand, packages his product without any outside box, in a brown colored glass bottle with
Cited 25 timesPublishedMunoz v. Earthgrains Distribution, LLC
District Court, S.D. California · Aug 26, 2025
Laub v. United States 18 DOI, 342 F.3d 1080, 1093 (9th Cir. 2003); Hallett v. Morgan, 296 F.3d 732, 751 (9th Cir. 19 2002); see HDT Bio Corp. v. Emcure Pharms., Ltd., No. … Sept. 4, 2014) (finding no control although the subsidiary and parent company share 14 the same internal legal group and had the “exact same ten-member Board of Directors,” 15 because “the boards maintain separate meeting
Cited 0 timesUnknownEmpl. Ins. of Wausau v. Musick, Peeler & Garrett
871 F. Supp. 381 · District Court, S.D. California · Nov 22, 1994
Lubin v. Sybedon Corp., 688 F.Supp. 1425, 1453 (S.D.Cal.1988); see also, Mirkin v. … Ball, Hunt, Hart, Brown, & Baerwitz, 57 Cal.App.3d 104 , 128 Cal.Rptr. 901 (1976), where the attorney’s opinion letter was communicated directly to the plaintiff so that there could be a duty of care.
Cited 15 timesPublishedRasidescu v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.
496 F. Supp. 2d 1155 · District Court, S.D. California · Jul 26, 2007
Offshore Rental Co. v. … See Vultaggio, 572 N.W.2d at 453-54 (noting that privilege has been applied to statements made to grand jury or district attorney relating to matters under investigation, to statements made to real estate broker’s board,
Cited 5 timesPublishedDistrict Court, S.D. California · Sep 25, 2023
Earl v. … In fact, the complaint’s entire 2 || discussion of the board is two sentences: “Plaintiff appealed her termination which was 3 || presented to Defendant’s Board of Directors on Monday, April 25, 2022.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Apr 21, 2026
See, e.g., Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 6 975 F.2d 604, 607 (9th Cir. 1992); Olvera v. Citibank, N.A., No. 25-cv-789-H-AHG, 2025 7 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 117769, at *2, *4–*5 (S.D. Cal. June 19, 2025). … parties represent to the Court that counsel for Defendant Del Mar Capital 15 Investors LLC is unavailable on April 27, 2026, because he has a previously-scheduled 16 in-person hearing before the California Medical Board
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Dec 8, 2020
Coleman v. … (See Brown Decl. Ex. C at 1.)
Cited 0 timesUnknownSubpoena of DJO, LLC v. Hunter
295 F.R.D. 494 · District Court, S.D. California · Jan 15, 2014
Co. v. Metropolitan Life Insur. Co., 228 F.R.D. 111, 113 (D.Conn.2005); Moon v. SCP Pool Corp., 232 F.R.D. 633, 637 (C.D.Cal.2005). … As the court in Northwestern Mem’l Hosp. v.
Cited 7 timesPublishedDistrict Court, S.D. California · Jun 7, 2021
See Brown-Hunter v. … Nichols 3 ||v. Saul, 2019 WL 6252934, at *10 (S.D. Cal., Nov. 22, 2019) (quoting Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d 4 495).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Jun 18, 2024
(quoting 12 Kentucky v. … Brown v. California Dep’t of Corr., 554 F.3d 747, 752 22 (9th Cir. 2009) (quoting Dittman v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownRMS NA, Inc. v. RMS (AUS) PTY LTD
District Court, S.D. California · Feb 24, 2025
Lindora, LLC v. Isagenix Int’l, LLC, 11 198 F. Supp. 3d 1127, 1137 (S.D. Cal. 2016). Absent such a showing, however, general 12 jurisdiction will be improper. See, e.g., Brown v. … The defendant also reviewed the joint venture agreement in California 20 with a member of the plaintiff’s board of directors. Id.
Cited 0 timesUnknownManzano v. Southern Indian Health Council, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California · Jul 7, 2021
Supp. 1052, 1058 (D.S.D. 1997) (holding that school 20 board’s incorporation as a nonprofit under South Dakota law did not affect its status as an 21 “Indian tribe” not covered by Title VII); see also Duke v. … Cain v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownAnderson v. Sodexo Management, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California · May 4, 2020
Inc., et al., 3:19-cv-01904- GPC-BLM (“Baker matter”); Browning v. Sodexo Mgmt. … Inc., et al., 3:19-cv-01905-GPC-BLM 25 (“Browning matter”); Abbott v. Sodexo Mgmt.
Cited 0 timesUnknownEvers v. Sodexo Management, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California · May 4, 2020
Inc., et al., 3:19-cv-01904- GPC-BLM (“Baker matter”); Browning v. Sodexo Mgmt. … Inc., et al., 3:19-cv-01905-GPC-BLM 25 (“Browning matter”); Abbott v. Sodexo Mgmt.
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna