Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscasd

3,618 results

1.63s

  • Securities and Exchange Commission v. Sripetch

    District Court, S.D. California · Dec 16, 2024

    See Stanz v. Brown, No. 3:22-CV- 01164-GPC-JLB, 2024 WL 4267191, at *1 n.1 (S.D. Cal. Sept. 23, 2024); Suarez v. … Jan. 10, 2023); see 27 also Radcliffe v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Love v. Madden

    District Court, S.D. California · Oct 16, 2020

    Inst., Walpole v. Hill, 472 U.S. 445, 455 12 (1985). “[T]he relevant question is whether there is any evidence in the record that could 13 support the conclusion reached by the disciplinary board.” Id. … Leer v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Villa v. County of San Diego

    District Court, S.D. California · Sep 15, 2020

    Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 21 U.S. 397, 415 (1997). Put differently, “a municipality sued under § 1983 is not subject to 22 vicarious liability for the acts of its agents.” Duvall v. … Davis v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Laucella v. Lowe's Home Centers, LLC

    District Court, S.D. California · Apr 22, 2024

    Plaintiff alleges that, while selecting boards for a project in a Lowe’s 1 retail store in Carlsbad, California, “several 12-foot-long boards slid off the shelf and 2 landed directly on top of his right foot.” … Council of Laborers v. Pittsburg-Des Moines Steel Co., 69 F.3d 2 1034, 1038 (9th Cir. 1995) (quoting Maniar v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Carter v. City of Carlsbad

    799 F. Supp. 2d 1147 · District Court, S.D. California · Jun 30, 2011

    Malley v. … Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 410 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997)).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • McNamara v. Wells Fargo & Company

    District Court, S.D. California · Jul 29, 2022

    Co. v. Lee Investments, LLC, 11 641 F.3d 1126, 1136 (9th Cir. 2011); Facedouble, Inc. v. Face.com, 2014 WL 585868, at 12 *1 (S.D. Cal. … .”); Weil v. Long Island Sav. Bank, 195 F.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Miles Laboratories, Inc. v. Frolich

    195 F. Supp. 256 · District Court, S.D. California · Jun 8, 1961

    Co. v. … Inside is a long cylindrical jar containing the tablets with a label similar to that on the outside box. 16 Defendant, on the other hand, packages his product without any outside box, in a brown colored glass bottle with

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Munoz v. Earthgrains Distribution, LLC

    District Court, S.D. California · Aug 26, 2025

    Laub v. United States 18 DOI, 342 F.3d 1080, 1093 (9th Cir. 2003); Hallett v. Morgan, 296 F.3d 732, 751 (9th Cir. 19 2002); see HDT Bio Corp. v. Emcure Pharms., Ltd., No. … Sept. 4, 2014) (finding no control although the subsidiary and parent company share 14 the same internal legal group and had the “exact same ten-member Board of Directors,” 15 because “the boards maintain separate meeting

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Empl. Ins. of Wausau v. Musick, Peeler & Garrett

    871 F. Supp. 381 · District Court, S.D. California · Nov 22, 1994

    Lubin v. Sybedon Corp., 688 F.Supp. 1425, 1453 (S.D.Cal.1988); see also, Mirkin v. … Ball, Hunt, Hart, Brown, & Baerwitz, 57 Cal.App.3d 104 , 128 Cal.Rptr. 901 (1976), where the attorney’s opinion letter was communicated directly to the plaintiff so that there could be a duty of care.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Rasidescu v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.

    496 F. Supp. 2d 1155 · District Court, S.D. California · Jul 26, 2007

    Offshore Rental Co. v. … See Vultaggio, 572 N.W.2d at 453-54 (noting that privilege has been applied to statements made to grand jury or district attorney relating to matters under investigation, to statements made to real estate broker’s board,

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Melendrez v. All Kids Academy

    District Court, S.D. California · Sep 25, 2023

    Earl v. … In fact, the complaint’s entire 2 || discussion of the board is two sentences: “Plaintiff appealed her termination which was 3 || presented to Defendant’s Board of Directors on Monday, April 25, 2022.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Freitag

    District Court, S.D. California · Apr 21, 2026

    See, e.g., Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 6 975 F.2d 604, 607 (9th Cir. 1992); Olvera v. Citibank, N.A., No. 25-cv-789-H-AHG, 2025 7 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 117769, at *2, *4–*5 (S.D. Cal. June 19, 2025). … parties represent to the Court that counsel for Defendant Del Mar Capital 15 Investors LLC is unavailable on April 27, 2026, because he has a previously-scheduled 16 in-person hearing before the California Medical Board

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Kamal v. Eden Creamery, LLC

    District Court, S.D. California · Dec 8, 2020

    Coleman v. … (See Brown Decl. Ex. C at 1.)

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Subpoena of DJO, LLC v. Hunter

    295 F.R.D. 494 · District Court, S.D. California · Jan 15, 2014

    Co. v. Metropolitan Life Insur. Co., 228 F.R.D. 111, 113 (D.Conn.2005); Moon v. SCP Pool Corp., 232 F.R.D. 633, 637 (C.D.Cal.2005). … As the court in Northwestern Mem’l Hosp. v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Davis v. Saul

    District Court, S.D. California · Jun 7, 2021

    See Brown-Hunter v. … Nichols 3 ||v. Saul, 2019 WL 6252934, at *10 (S.D. Cal., Nov. 22, 2019) (quoting Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d 4 495).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Salmen v. Terronez

    District Court, S.D. California · Jun 18, 2024

    (quoting 12 Kentucky v. … Brown v. California Dep’t of Corr., 554 F.3d 747, 752 22 (9th Cir. 2009) (quoting Dittman v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • RMS NA, Inc. v. RMS (AUS) PTY LTD

    District Court, S.D. California · Feb 24, 2025

    Lindora, LLC v. Isagenix Int’l, LLC, 11 198 F. Supp. 3d 1127, 1137 (S.D. Cal. 2016). Absent such a showing, however, general 12 jurisdiction will be improper. See, e.g., Brown v. … The defendant also reviewed the joint venture agreement in California 20 with a member of the plaintiff’s board of directors. Id.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Manzano v. Southern Indian Health Council, Inc.

    District Court, S.D. California · Jul 7, 2021

    Supp. 1052, 1058 (D.S.D. 1997) (holding that school 20 board’s incorporation as a nonprofit under South Dakota law did not affect its status as an 21 “Indian tribe” not covered by Title VII); see also Duke v. … Cain v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Anderson v. Sodexo Management, Inc.

    District Court, S.D. California · May 4, 2020

    Inc., et al., 3:19-cv-01904- GPC-BLM (“Baker matter”); Browning v. Sodexo Mgmt. … Inc., et al., 3:19-cv-01905-GPC-BLM 25 (“Browning matter”); Abbott v. Sodexo Mgmt.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Evers v. Sodexo Management, Inc.

    District Court, S.D. California · May 4, 2020

    Inc., et al., 3:19-cv-01904- GPC-BLM (“Baker matter”); Browning v. Sodexo Mgmt. … Inc., et al., 3:19-cv-01905-GPC-BLM 25 (“Browning matter”); Abbott v. Sodexo Mgmt.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.