Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
2,024 results
2.20s
United States v. Medina & Medina
617 F. Supp. 1163 · District Court, S.D. California · Jul 23, 1985
The extent of this cooperation was never clearly defined in Lopez’ or Vidal’s testimony. It is certain, however, that Vidal did not have the funds to pay for Lopez’ services. … After Vidal became an informant, Dunn and Vidal established a routine where Vidal created notes and then turned them over to Dunn, within a day or two of their execution.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, S.D. California · Dec 19, 2024
The Court dismissed with prejudice Plaintiff’s § 1983 claims against the 15 Individual Defendants on the grounds that (1) Eleventh Amendment Immunity barred these 16 claims against Palomar’s employees and (2 … accordingly.3 8 To state a prima facie case for an intentional discrimination claim in violation of 9 Title II of the ADA, a plaintiff must show: 10 (1) he is a “qualified
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Jul 16, 2021
2020) 18 (“Petitioner’s failure to exhaust does not preclude the Court from adjudicating these 19 contentions because, for the reasons discussed below, Claim One subparts (a), (d), (e), (g) 20 and (h) each clearly … “Under clearly established Supreme Court law, such contention [regarding 11 a state court misapplying state law] neither gives rise to an equal protection claim, nor 12 provides a basis for habeas relief.”
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Jul 22, 2024
2)(B) and § 1915A(b), the Court must screen a 10 prisoner’s IFP complaint and sua sponte dismiss it to the extent that it is frivolous, 11 malicious, fails to state a claim, or seeks damages from defendants who are immune … ALL PAYMENTS MUST 11 CLEARLY IDENTIFY THE NAME AND CASE NUMBER ASSIGNED TO THIS 12 ACTION; 13 3.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Jan 17, 2023
The Court agrees with Defendants and finds that Plaintiffs 21 have failed to establish a legal or factual basis to permit the requested cross-use … Further, the court in Foltz clearly indicates that any “disputes over the 2 || ultimate discoverability of specific materials covered by the protective order must be resolved 3 || by collateral courts.”
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Oct 1, 2020
also Jones, 393 F.3d at 928 n.5 (noting that “California 11 courts have read out if the statute the qualification that the period of incarceration must 12 be ‘for a term less than for life’ in order for a prisoner to qualify … The CDCR is not a 8 “person” subject to suit under Section 1983 and is entitled to immunity from suit for 9 monetary damages under the Eleventh Amendment.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Aug 19, 2020
Under these statutes, 22 the Court must sua sponte dismiss a prisoner’s IFP complaint, or any portion of it, which 23 is frivolous, malicious, fails to state a claim, or seeks damages from defendants who are 24 immune … ALL PAYMENTS 6 SHALL BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED BY THE NAME AND NUMBER ASSIGNED TO 7 THIS ACTION; 8 3.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDesmond v. Charter Communications, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California · Jul 19, 2021
A prima facie case for disability discrimination under FEHA based 9 on grounds of physical disability requires that Plaintiff: (1) establish that she suffers from 10 a disability; (2) is otherwise qualified to do her … As such, Plaintiff qualifies as an exempt outside sales person.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · May 7, 2024
§ 1915(e)(2) and § 1915A(b), the Court must sua sponte dismiss a 21 prisoner’s IFP complaint, or any portion of it, which is frivolous, malicious, fails to state a 22 claim, or seeks damages from defendants who are immune … To 15 state an ADA claim, a plaintiff must allege: “(1) he is an individual with a disability; (2) 16 he is otherwise qualified to participate in or receive the benefit of some public entity’s 17 services, programs,
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Mar 19, 2024
This clearly demonstrates a mutually 28 beneficial arrangement. See City & Cty. of Honolulu v. … Wherever the line may lie, BJC clearly sits on the private side.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Mar 19, 2024
This clearly demonstrates a mutually 28 beneficial arrangement. See City & Cty. of Honolulu v. … Wherever the line may lie, BJC clearly sits on the private side.
Cited 0 timesUnknownLuciano v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
District Court, S.D. California · Jun 14, 2023
To make out a prima facie case of 1 retaliation under Title VII, a plaintiff must establish that: (1) he undertook a protected 2 activity under Title VII; (2) his employer subjected him to an adverse employment 3 action … qualified females 26 were accepted or positions were left vacant rather hire or promote a qualified male. 27 42. . . . as well as the
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Jul 21, 2025
“To establish a claim under the ADA or Rehabilitation Act, [a plaintiff] must 19 show: (1) [she] is a qualified individual with a disability; (2) [she] was denied a reasonable 20 accommodation that [she] needs in order … It applies only to “‘business establishments’ that are 28 ‘generally open to the public’ and mandates that those establishments ‘serve all persons 1 without arbitrary discrimination.’” Smith v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Feb 27, 2026
BofA for the benefit of Plaintiff and subject to her ownership rights. 9 (Id. ¶ 32.) 10 Plaintiff contends that under California law, such deposits qualify … “Where, as here, a case is at the pleading stage, the plaintiff 7 must ‘clearly . . . allege facts demonstrating’ each element.” Spokeo, 578 U.S. at 338 8 (quoting Warth v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Oct 22, 2020
Under these 23 statutes, the Court must sua sponte dismiss a prisoner’s IFP complaint, or any portion of it, 24 which is frivolous, malicious, fails to state a claim, or seeks damages from defendants who 25 are immune … ALL PAYMENTS MUST BE CLEARLY 24 IDENTIFIED BY THE NAME AND NUMBER ASSIGNED TO THIS ACTION. 25 3.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Oct 4, 2023
Thus, Defendant 10 has failed to satisfy his burden establishing his counsel’s performance was deficient. … Regardless of the transcript’s typographical error, the Government clearly mentioned in Defendant’s 28 1 || United States v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownBiag v. King George - J&J Worldwide Services LLC
District Court, S.D. California · Jul 22, 2020
Defendant reached a total of $261,900 but did not clearly provide the 2 calculation. (Opp’n 15.) … Sept. 12, 2016). 20 Though claim one specifically alleges that the meal and rest period violations 21 were “institutional and established,” the actual language clearly does not support a 22 100% violation
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Jul 28, 2020
However, Plaintiff alleges he was 15 able to provide invoices to “establish” he had purchased the items. … ALL PAYMENTS MUST BE 11 CLEARLY IDENTIFIED BY THE NAME AND NUMBER ASSIGNED TO THIS 12 ACTION. 13 3.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Oct 7, 2019
Under these 26 statutes, the Court must sua sponte dismiss a prisoner’s IFP complaint, or any portion of it, 27 which is frivolous, malicious, fails to state a claim, or seeks damages from defendants who 28 are immune … PAYMENTS 19 SHALL BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED BY THE NAME AND NUMBER ASSIGNED TO 20 THIS ACTION. 21 3.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, S.D. California · Jan 18, 2024
Thus, Defendant 10 has failed to satisfy his burden establishing his counsel’s performance was deficient. … Regardless of the transcript’s typographical error, the Government clearly mentioned in Defendant’s 28 1 || United States v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna