Case law

Bowles v. Crew

59 F. Supp. 809 · District Court, S.D. California · Mar 31, 1945

Willingham, 1944, 321 U.S. 503 , 64 S.Ct. 641 , 88 L.Ed. 892 ; Henderson v. Kimmel, D.C.Kan.1942, 47 F.Supp. 635 ; Brown v. Lee, D.C.Cal.1943, 51 F.Supp. 85 ; Illinois Packing Co. v. … National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corporation, 1937, 301 U.S. 1 , 57 S.Ct. 615 , 81 L.Ed. 893 , 108 A.L. R. 1352; United States v. Darby Lumber Co., 1941, 312 U.S. 100 , 61 S.Ct. 451 , 85 L.

Foster v. Board of Trustees of the California State University

District Court, S.D. California · May 6, 2025

DCD Programs, Ltd. 2 v. … See e.g., DCD Programs, Ltd. v.

Bo v. Board of Regents of the University of California

District Court, S.D. California · May 9, 2025

Johnson v. United States Dep’t of 17 Treasury, 939 F.2d 820, 824 (9th Cir. 1991). … Palmer v. Valdez, 560 F.3d 965, 970 (9th Cir. 2009).

Matthews v. San Diego County Board of Supervisors

District Court, S.D. California · Aug 27, 2019

Huskey v. … Nor does the Court, drawing on its own “full 27 knowledge” of relevant precedent, believe that any such clearly established law exists. 28 Brown v. Grinder, No. 2:13-CV-01007KJMKJN, 2019 WL 280296, at *15 (E.D.

Weiner v. May Department Stores Co.

35 F. Supp. 895 · District Court, S.D. California · Dec 4, 1940

Brown v. Board of Trustees, 41 Cal.App. 100 , 182 P. 316 ; Olson v. Whitthorne & Swan, 203 Cal. 206 , 263 P. 518 , 58 A.L.R. 129 . In Scellars v. … Micek v. Weaver-Jackson Co., 12 Cal.App.2d 19, 22 , 54 P.2d 768 ; Seitzman v. Srere Corp., 116 Cal.App. 674, 678 , 3 P.2d 58 ; Valente v. Sierra R. R. Co., 151 Cal. 534, 539, 541 , 91 P. 481 . Wilkins v. G.

United States v. Von's Grocery Company

233 F. Supp. 976 · District Court, S.D. California · Sep 14, 1964

Both the legislative history 2 and decisions of the Supreme Court, beginning with Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294 , 82 S.Ct. 1502 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 , set forth the purpose of Section 7 of the Clayton Act. … It was noted in Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, at page 332, United States Reports, 82 S.

Griffeth v. Detrich

448 F. Supp. 1137 · District Court, S.D. California · Mar 29, 1978

Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners, 353 U.S. 232 , 77 S.Ct. 752 , 1 L.Ed.2d 796 (1957); Goldsmith v. Board of Tax Appeals, 270 U.S. 117 , 46 S.Ct. 215 , 70 L.Ed. 494 (1926). … Board of Regents v. Roth, supra, 408 U.S. at 577, 92 S.Ct. at 2709 .

In Re Countrywide Financial Corp. Mortg. Marketing

601 F. Supp. 2d 1201 · District Court, S.D. California · Feb 5, 2009

See Lui Ciro, Inc. v. Ciro, Inc., 895 F.Supp. 1365, 1374 (D.Hawai’i 1995) (quoting Wool v. … See Slane v. Emoto, 582 F.Supp.2d 1067, 1085 (W.D.Wis.2008) (quoting State v.

Thomas v. Hernandez

740 F. Supp. 2d 1174 · District Court, S.D. California · Sep 13, 2010

Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1261 (9th Cir.1992); Noll v. … Brown v. Cate, 2009 WL 1858119 at *5 (E.D.Cal. June 29, 2009); Soto v. Board of Prison Term, 2007 WL 2947573 at *2 (E.D.Cal. October 9, 2007).

Melleck v. Oliver J. Olson and Co.

149 F. Supp. 481 · District Court, S.D. California · Mar 13, 1957

Sheets, 1941, 313 U.S. 100, 108-109 , 61 S.Ct. 868 , 85 L.Ed. 1214 ; Thomas v. Board of Trustees, 1904, 195 U.S. 207, 210-211 , 25 S.Ct. 24 , 49 L.Ed. 160 ; Grace v. American Central Ins. … Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co., 1943, 318 U.S. 36, 43 , 63 S.Ct. 488 , 87 L.Ed. 596 , or the “admiralty side” of this Court, Brown v. C. D.

Brown

District Court, S.D. California · Jan 5, 2026

§ 636(b)(1); see also United States v. Remsing, 6 F.2d 614, 617 (9" Cir. 1989). … P. 72(b) advisory committee note to 1983 amendment; see 9 || also United States v.

Lockheed Aircraft Corp. v. Rathman

106 F. Supp. 810 · District Court, S.D. California · Jul 21, 1952

Even during Barker’s absences it was Comptroller Browne who was vested with what was called “superior seniority” among the financial subalterns, and whose “opinion prevailed” in matters requiring decisions •during any absence … The plaintiff now contends that SEC Rule X-3B-2 is invalid and in support of its contention cites the case of Colby v.

Leh v. General Petroleum Corporation

165 F. Supp. 933 · District Court, S.D. California · Sep 15, 1958

Lewis v. Hayes, 1918, 177 Cal. 587 , 171 P. 293 ; Ginsberg Tile Co. v. Faraone, 1929, 99 Cal.App. 381 , 278 P. 866 ; Holden v. Men-singer, 1917, 175 Cal. 300, 303 , 165 P. 950 , 951 (dictum); Heinfelt v. … Turning next to the motion to dismiss for failure to join Brown, it must be held that he is not an indispensable party to this action.

Appiah v. Vista Unified School District Board of Trustees

District Court, S.D. California · Aug 6, 2021

Plaintiffs’ Allegations 22 Plaintiffs sue forty-four Defendants, including Vista Unified School District, the 23 California State Board of Education, the U.S. … Brown 2 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(i)-(ii) IFP Case

Spectrum Pacific West, LLC v. Imperial Irrigation District

District Court, S.D. California · Aug 26, 2025

(the “Brown Act”) against Defendant Board Members J.B. … Brown Act (Gov’t Code sections 5495.1 and 54954.3) 17 Plaintiff alleges Defendants violated two subsections of the Brown Act.

Hudson v. Vista Unified School District Board of Trustees

District Court, S.D. California · Aug 6, 2021

Plaintiffs’ Allegations 22 Plaintiffs sue forty-four Defendants, including Vista Unified School District, the 23 California State Board of Education, the U.S. … Brown 2 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(i)-(ii) IFP Case

PEOPLE, ETC. v. Coast Federal Sav. & Loan Ass'n

98 F. Supp. 311 · District Court, S.D. California · Jun 21, 1951

Fahey v. Mallonee, 1947, 332 U.S. 245 , 67 S.Ct. 1552 , 91 L.Ed. 2030 . No provision is made for sharing the Board’s delegated authority with state regulatory or supervisory agencies. North Arlington Nat. Bank v. … Bethlehem Steel Co. v. State Labor Board, supra. The Board possesses the power to correct the matters complained of by the plaintiff by the enforcement of its own regulations.

Salatich v. Hellen

4 F. Supp. 474 · District Court, S.D. California · May 25, 1933

Brown-Kohlmeyer or the plaintiff Peter Salatich. When the Gahn v. … Brown-Kohlmeyer.

Patriot Scientific Corp. v. Korodi

504 F. Supp. 2d 952 · District Court, S.D. California · May 25, 2007

In Grimes v. … Thus, the alleged oral agreement was held to be “unenforceable for lack of both board approval and a written agreement.” Id. at 266 . Similarly, in Scarpinato v.

Mallonee v. Fahey

68 F. Supp. 418 · District Court, S.D. California · Sep 5, 1946

We refer particularly to Panama Refining Co. v. Ryan, 293 U.S. 388 , 55 S.Ct. 241 , 79 L.Ed. 446 , and Schechter Poultry Corp. v. U.S., 295 U.S. 495 , 55 S.Ct. 837 , 79 L.Ed. 1570 , 97 A.L.R. 947 . … See also, Boeing Air Transport v. Farley, 64 App. D.C. 162 , 75 F.2d 765 . 3 National Industrial Recovery Act; Panama Refining Co. v. Ryan, 293 U.S. 388 , 55 S.Ct. 241 , 79 L.Ed. 446 ; Schechter Poultry Corp. v. U.