Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscasd

3,618 results

1.41s

  • Mcanally v. Berryhill

    District Court, S.D. California · Mar 25, 2020

    Recheal Stewart Brown (Licensed Clinical Social Worker) 16 On February 17, 2017, Plaintiff saw LCSW Recheal Stewart Brown at PsyCare for 17 a psychological evaluation. (AR 96–101.) … Brown–Hunter v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Mustain

    District Court, S.D. California · May 29, 2026

    Thus, the ALJ may 24 reject Plaintiff’s testimony “only by providing specific, clear, and convincing reasons.” 25 See Brown-Hunter v. … Brown-Hunter, 806 F.3d at 495. 3 Moreover, the Court is “constrained to review [only] the reasons the ALJ asserts.” 4 Connett v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United States v. Certain Tracts of Land

    57 F. Supp. 739 · District Court, S.D. California · Oct 13, 1944

    Utility Dist. v. Kieffer, 1929, 99 Cal.App. 240 , 278 P. 476 , 279 P. 178 ; and see Central Pac. R. Co. v. Pearson, supra; Spring Valley Waterworks v. Drinkhouse, supra; City of Santa Ana v. … Chappell v. United States, 160 U.S. 499, 512, 513 , 16 S.Ct. 397 , 40 L.Ed. 510 ; Brown v. United States, 263 U.S. 78, 86 , 44 S.Ct. 92, 95 , 68 L.Ed. 171 .

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Doe v. San Diego Unified School District

    District Court, S.D. California · Jun 21, 2022

    Doe v. San Diego Unified School District, 142 S.Ct. 1099 (2022); Doe v. San Diego 27 Unified School District (“Doe III”), 22 F.4th 1099 (9th Cir. 2022). … All. for the Wild Rockies v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Upper Deck Co. v. American International Specialty Lines Insurance

    495 F. Supp. 2d 1092 · District Court, S.D. California · Jun 28, 2007

    Sovak v. Chugai Pharm. Co., 280 F.3d 1266, 1271 (9th Cir.2002); see Garvey v. … In Coast Trading Co., Inc. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Ali v. Franklin Wireless Corp.

    District Court, S.D. California · Jan 24, 2024

    Officers for Justice v. Civil Serv. … Hesse v. Sprint Corp., 598 F.3d 581, 590 (9th Cir. 2010) 20 (quoting Williams v. Boeing Co., 517 F.3d 1120, 1133 (9th Cir.2008)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Interstate Commerce Commission v. Shippers Cooperative, Inc.

    196 F. Supp. 8 · District Court, S.D. California · Jul 11, 1961

    Civil Aeronautics Board v. Modern Air Transport, 2 Cir., 1950, 179 F.2d 622 , 624 et seq. … defendant Pier-son-Corn is participating in Shippers Coop’s violations of the Act, plaintiff is entitled to an injunction against both defendants. *11 The court regards the case of Schenley Distillers Corporation et al. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • In Re Etherton

    88 F. Supp. 874 · District Court, S.D. California · Jan 20, 1950

    Bolling v. Bowen, 4 Cir., 1941, 118 F.2d 59, 62 . 15 . Lockhart v. … See Isaacs v. Hobbs Tie & Timber Co., 1931, 282 U.S. 734, 737-738 , 51 S.Ct. 270 , 75 L.Ed. 645 ; United States v. Marxen, 1939, 307 U.S. 200, 207-208 , 59 S.Ct. 811 , 83 L.Ed. 1222 ; Thompson v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Harper v. George Bailey Detention Facility

    District Court, S.D. California · Mar 15, 2021

    Ashcroft v. … See Board of Cty. Comm’rs. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403 12 (1997); Monell, 436 U.S. at 691 (“[A] a municipality cannot be held liable solely because 13 it employs a tortfeasor.”); Jackson v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Marasigan v. MidFirst Bank

    District Court, S.D. California · May 15, 2023

    Brown passed 10 away on January 3, 2019, and Elvira T. Brown passed away on September 7, 2019. 11 (Compl. ¶ 10.) … Brown. 21 (Compl. ¶ 15.)

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United States v. Spector

    99 F. Supp. 778 · District Court, S.D. California · Sep 12, 1951

    Later in Fong Yue Ting v. … U.S.Const, art. 1, § 9; Garner v. Board of Public Works of City of Los Angeles, 1951, 341 U.S. 716, 721 , 71 S.Ct. 909 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • DS Advanced Enterprises, LTD. v. Lowe's Companies, Inc.

    District Court, S.D. California · Feb 24, 2025

    Kona 9 Enterprises, Inc. v. … Inc. v. Montefiore Hosp., 732 F.2d 1572, 1578 (Fed.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • LaRose

    District Court, S.D. California · Jun 22, 2026

    Petitioner 1 now filed the instant, second Petition, following an order of removal from the IJ. 2 Petitioner states that he plans to appeal the order of removal to the Board of Immigration 3 || Appeals … See Leonardo 6 || v. Crawford, 646 F.3d 1157, 1160 (9th Cir. 2011) (pursuing habeas relief before exhausting 7 |}administrative remedies at BIA is an improper shortcut).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. Harrison

    106 F. Supp. 419 · District Court, S.D. California · Jul 18, 1952

    Drown v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co., 175 Cal. 21, 23 , 165 P. 5 ; West Coast Life Ins. Co. v. … People v. Kelley, 24 Cal.App. 54 , 140 P. 302 ; People v. Miller, 114 Cal.App. 293 , 299 P. 742 ; People v. Freel, 48 Cal. 436 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • San Diego Unified Port District v. Gianturco

    457 F. Supp. 283 · District Court, S.D. California · Aug 30, 1978

    E. g., City of Trenton v. State of New Jersey, 262 U.S. 182 , 43 S.Ct. 534 , 67 L.Ed. 937 (1923); City of Newark v. State of New Jersey, 262 U.S. 192 , 43 S.Ct. 539 , 67 L.Ed. 943 (1923); Williams v. … Triplett v. Tiemann, 302 F.Supp. 1239 (D.Neb.1969); Carlsbad Union School District of San Diego County v. Rafferty, 300 F.Supp. 434 (S.D.Cal.1969); Douglas Independent School District No. 3 v.

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • American Claims Management, Inc v. Allied World Surplus Lines Insurance Company

    District Court, S.D. California · Jun 9, 2020

    Nixon v. Warner 26 Commc’ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 (1978). … Ctr. for Auto Safety v. Chrysler 5 Grp., LLC, 809 F.3d 1092, 1096 (9th Cir. 2016) (quoting United States v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Power Density Solutions, LLC v. Google LLC

    District Court, S.D. California · Aug 18, 2025

    The components of the circuit board 3 may therefore be cooled “by both conductive cooling as the fluid passes through the core 4 of the component, circuit board, or heat sink and by evaporative cooling as the liquid … 5 changes phase at or near the surface of the component circuit board, or heat sink.”

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Larose

    District Court, S.D. California · Aug 5, 2026

    (quoting Leonardo v. Crawford, 646 F.3d 1157, 1160 (9th 1 ||Cir. 2011).] … See also Singh v. Warden of Imperial Regional Detention Facility, et al., No. 3:26-cv-154-BAS-MSB; Bah v. Diwver, et al., No. 3:26-cv-1453-BAS-DDL.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Wheeler v. Allison

    District Court, S.D. California · Jun 7, 2022

    See O’Bremski v. … Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 569–72 28 (1972). Notably, Courts have found that one does not have a liberty interest in having 1 accurate prison records. See Webb v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United States v. Schneiderman

    102 F. Supp. 87 · District Court, S.D. California · Dec 11, 1951

    Keck v. … See Dennis v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.